| Literature DB >> 31903208 |
Jianhua Hu1, Fengwen Zhao2, Qifan Ren2, Ye Kuang2, Tan Zhou2, Zhouquan Luo1.
Abstract
Under different exploitive conditions, the humidity levels of the backfill stopes are not the same. Humidity greatly affects the strength and microscopic characterization of the backfill. Cemented paste backfill (CPB) specimens were cured using 0, 30, 70% and standard curing (20°C, 99%) under four different humidity conditions. At 28 days, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques were used to obtain the microscopic features of the CPB specimens. The relationships between the permeability and uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of the CPB specimens, and the microscopic characteristics of the CPB specimens, were established. The results showed the following: (i) The permeability of the CPB had an exponential functional relationship with its stone powder content. (ii) The stone powder content of CPB and the peak area of the T 2 spectrum are negatively correlated with the UCS. However, there was a T 2 peak area corresponding to the worst UCS with the same stone powder content. (iii) The peak area of the T 2 spectrum showed that the proportion of area of a small pore size was more than 80%, indicating that the pore size was mainly small. The pore diameter of small pores was linearly and inversely proportional to the UCS of the specimens. It can be found that the factors affecting the strength characteristics of CPB include not only the stone powder content, but also the curing conditions of different humidity.Keywords: T2 spectral area; UCS; humidity; permeability; weighted average T2
Year: 2019 PMID: 31903208 PMCID: PMC6936273 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191227
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.Particle size distribution.
Physical properties and chemical composition of the tailings and stone powder.
Chemical composition of cement.
| chemical composition | 3Ca · SiO2 | 2Ca · SiO2 | 3CaO · Al2O3 | 4CaO · Al2O3 · Fe2O3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| content (%) | 52.8 | 20.7 | 11.5 | 8.8 |
Curing conditions of CPB specimens.
| kind group | 0% | 30% | 70% | 99% | saturated water treatment | saturated water treatment and centrifugation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | C1A1(1)–C1A1(3) | C2A1(4)–C2A1(6) | C3A1(7)–C3A1(9) | C4A1(10)–C4A1(12) | C5A1(13)–C5A1(15) | C6A1(16)–C6A1(18) |
| A2 | C1A2(1)–C1A2(3) | C2A2(4)–C2A2(6) | C3A2(7)–C3A2(9) | C4A2(10)–C4A2(12) | C5A2(13)–C5A2(15) | C6A2(16)–C6A2(18) |
| A3 | C1A3(1)–C1A3(3) | C2A3(4)–C2A3(6) | C3A3(7)–C3A3(9) | C4A3(10)–C4A3(12) | C5A3(13)–C5A3(15) | C6A3(16)–C6A3(18) |
| A4 | C1A4(1)–C1A4(3) | C2A4(4)–C2A4(6) | C3A4(7)–C3A4(9) | C4A4(10)–C4A4(12) | C5A4(13)–C5A4(15) | C6A4(16)–C6A4(18) |
| A5 | C1A5(1)–C1A5(3) | C2A5(4)–C2A5(6) | C3A5(7)–C3A5(9) | C4A5(10)–C4A5(12) | C5A5(13)–C5A5(15) | C6A5(16)–C6A5(18) |
| A6 | C1A6(1)–C1A6(3) | C2A6(4)–C2A6(6) | C3A6(7)–C3A6(9) | C4A6(10)–C4A6(12) | C5A6(13)–C5A6(15) | C6A6(16)–C6A6(18) |
| A7 | C1A7(1)–C1A7(3) | C2A7(4)–C2A7(6) | C3A7(7)–C3A7(9) | C4A7(10)–C4A7(12) | C5A7(13)–C5A7(15) | C6A7(16)–C6A7(18) |
| A8 | C1A8(1)–C1A8(3) | C2A8(4)–C2A8(6) | C3A8(7)–C3A8(9) | C4A8(10)–C4A8(12) | C5A8(13)–C5A8(15) | C6A8(16)–C6A8(18) |
SPCTR, MFs, stone powder content (SP content), cement content and tailing content of CPB specimens.
| group | SPCTR | MF (%) | SP content/% | cement content (%) | tailing content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 1:4 | 73 | 0.00 | 25.00 | 75 |
| A2 | 1.25 | 23.75 | 75 | ||
| A3 | 2.50 | 22.50 | 75 | ||
| A4 | 3.75 | 21.25 | 75 | ||
| A5 | 5.00 | 20.00 | 75 | ||
| A6 | 7.50 | 17.50 | 75 | ||
| A7 | 10.00 | 15.00 | 75 | ||
| A8 | 12.50 | 12.50 | 75 |
NMR test parameter setting.
| parameter | SW (kHz) | SF (MHz) | O1 (Hz) | TD | DRG1 | NS | P1 (μs) | P2 (μs) | NECH | TW | RFD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| number | 100 | 21 | 273173.80 | 2256 | 3 | 16 | 11.52 | 23.04 | 150 | 3000 | 0.3 |
Figure 2.Experiment process with sample preparation, UCS tests and SEM.
Figure 3.NMR T2 spectrum distribution of CPB specimens under different curing conditions. (a) 0% humidity. (b) 30% humidity. (c) 70% humidity. (d) 99% humidity. (e) Saturated water. (f) Saturated water and centrifugation.
T2 peak area and its proportion of CPB specimens under different curing conditions and stone powder content.
| curing conditions | group | first peak area | first peak area ratio (%) | second peak area | second peak area ratio (%) | total peak area |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | A1 | 117.0404 | 86.948 | 17.5693 | 10.139 | 134.6097 |
| A2 | 114.1468 | 82.701 | 23.8767 | 17.299 | 138.0235 | |
| A3 | 112.1973 | 84.811 | 20.0936 | 15.189 | 132.2909 | |
| A4 | 104.9372 | 79.551 | 26.9747 | 20.449 | 131.9119 | |
| A5 | 103.9769 | 80.968 | 24.4404 | 19.032 | 128.4173 | |
| A6 | 102.9564 | 81.588 | 23.2342 | 18.412 | 126.1906 | |
| A7 | 101.7290 | 80.123 | 25.2370 | 19.877 | 126.9660 | |
| A8 | 99.9935 | 81.082 | 23.3305 | 18.918 | 123.3240 | |
| C2 | A1 | 388.2096 | 96.973 | 12.1179 | 3.027 | 400.3275 |
| A2 | 387.6869 | 95.127 | 19.8598 | 4.873 | 407.5467 | |
| A3 | 365.4683 | 95.090 | 18.8711 | 4.910 | 384.3394 | |
| A4 | 327.1894 | 81.573 | 73.9108 | 18.427 | 401.1002 | |
| A5 | 282.3138 | 91.518 | 26.1652 | 8.482 | 308.4790 | |
| A6 | 268.6997 | 88.467 | 35.0291 | 11.533 | 303.7288 | |
| A7 | 145.5212 | 87.385 | 21.0076 | 12.615 | 166.5288 | |
| A8 | 135.9360 | 89.458 | 16.0191 | 10.542 | 151.9551 | |
| C3 | A1 | 577.1534 | 99.037 | 5.6120 | 0.963 | 582.7654 |
| A2 | 527.4483 | 98.133 | 10.0348 | 1.867 | 537.4831 | |
| A3 | 550.7071 | 97.403 | 14.6832 | 2.597 | 565.3903 | |
| A4 | 512.7181 | 97.907 | 10.9606 | 2.093 | 523.6787 | |
| A5 | 524.8990 | 97.910 | 11.2045 | 2.090 | 536.1035 | |
| A6 | 482.6831 | 98.786 | 5.9318 | 1.214 | 488.6149 | |
| A7 | 460.8953 | 98.923 | 5.0178 | 1.077 | 465.9131 | |
| A8 | 413.6614 | 98.215 | 7.5181 | 1.785 | 421.1795 | |
| C4 | A1 | 783.3576 | 97.738 | 18.1297 | 2.262 | 801.4873 |
| A2 | 728.0665 | 98.113 | 14.0028 | 1.887 | 742.0693 | |
| A3 | 634.1286 | 97.603 | 15.5733 | 2.397 | 649.7019 | |
| A4 | 561.0880 | 97.259 | 15.8129 | 2.741 | 576.9009 | |
| A5 | 622.6891 | 97.990 | 12.7728 | 2.010 | 635.4619 | |
| A6 | 570.6753 | 98.108 | 11.0054 | 1.892 | 581.6807 | |
| A7 | 549.6662 | 98.563 | 8.0139 | 1.437 | 557.6801 | |
| A8 | 455.7898 | 96.081 | 18.5910 | 3.919 | 474.3808 |
Figure 4.UCS of CPB specimens under different curing conditions and stone powder content.
Figure 5.Relationship between permeability and stone powder amount of CPB specimens.
Figure 6.WAT2 schematic diagram.
Figure 7.Relationship between UCS and WAT2 value of cemented backfill specimens.
Figure 8.Magnified SEM image.
Figure 9.Relationship between UCS and T2 peak area under different humidities.