L C B Kunen1, L H S Fontes1, J P Moraes-Filho2, F S Assirati1, T Navarro-Rodriguez3. 1. Departamento de Gastroenterología, Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil; Hospital Estatal de Servidores Públicos, São Paulo, Brasil. 2. Departamento de Gastroenterología, Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil. 3. Departamento de Gastroenterología, Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil. Electronic address: tomas.navarro@hc.fm.usp.br.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Since the 1960s, several studies have shown the effect of aging on esophageal motility, with inconsistent results. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the manometric results in older adult patients (=60 years of age) with an esophageal disorder and compare them with adults under 60 years of age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted that included a sample of 1,175 patients (936 older adults and 239 non-older adults). The patients were evaluated and compared with respect to (i) sex, (ii) main complaint for which esophageal manometry was indicated, (iii) comorbidities, (iv) current medications, (v) smoking, and (vi) manometry results. RESULTS: Patient age ranged from 19 to 92 years (women made up 76.5% of the older adults and 72.8% of the non-older adults). Normal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and normal peristalsis were more frequent in the non-older patient group (91.1% vs. 84.8% and 87.4% vs. 76%, respectively). The manometry results for the non-older adults vs. the older adults, respectively, were: achalasia (2.9% vs. 5.9%); hypercontractile disorder (9.2% vs. 10.4%); hypocontractile disorder (38.5% vs. 47.6%); and normal values (49.4% vs. 36.1%). After excluding the variables that could change esophageal motility, the results revealed significant differences between the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal manometry demonstrated statistically significant differences between the older adult and non-older adult study population evaluated.
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Since the 1960s, several studies have shown the effect of aging on esophageal motility, with inconsistent results. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the manometric results in older adult patients (=60 years of age) with an esophageal disorder and compare them with adults under 60 years of age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted that included a sample of 1,175 patients (936 older adults and 239 non-older adults). The patients were evaluated and compared with respect to (i) sex, (ii) main complaint for which esophageal manometry was indicated, (iii) comorbidities, (iv) current medications, (v) smoking, and (vi) manometry results. RESULTS:Patient age ranged from 19 to 92 years (women made up 76.5% of the older adults and 72.8% of the non-older adults). Normal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and normal peristalsis were more frequent in the non-older patient group (91.1% vs. 84.8% and 87.4% vs. 76%, respectively). The manometry results for the non-older adults vs. the older adults, respectively, were: achalasia (2.9% vs. 5.9%); hypercontractile disorder (9.2% vs. 10.4%); hypocontractile disorder (38.5% vs. 47.6%); and normal values (49.4% vs. 36.1%). After excluding the variables that could change esophageal motility, the results revealed significant differences between the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal manometry demonstrated statistically significant differences between the older adult and non-older adult study population evaluated.