Literature DB >> 31902019

Is it all in the details? Description content and false recognition errors.

Rebecca Brooke Bays1, Mary Ann Foley2, Annelise Cohen2.   

Abstract

In three experiments, we examined the effect of embellished content on memory errors for thematically related items as well as whether an encoding manipulation, specifically instructions to visualize content, further affects those errors. Using a modified Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, participants listened to subsets of DRM items embedded within scene descriptions. Some descriptions embellished item connections, weaving them into cohesive scenes. Other descriptions only made general reference to scenes, mentioning the items in list-like format. Listening to more detailed descriptions, compared to general scene references, elicited higher false recognition errors (Experiments 1 and 3). However, when description details varied within the same encoding series, as expected, false recognition errors did not differ significantly (Experiments 2 and 3). Results further suggest that more detailed content was more vividly imagined, providing one possible mechanism for increases in false recognition (Experiment 3). Implications for theoretical discussions of encoding task effects on false recognition errors are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Description content; False recognition; Imagery; Source monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31902019     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-019-00945-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  14 in total

1.  The impersistence of false memory persistence.

Authors:  J M Lampinen; R M Schwartz
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2000-11

2.  On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.

Authors:  J DEESE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-07

3.  Reading and visual memory: remembering scenes that were never seen.

Authors:  H Intraub; J E Hoffman
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1992

4.  Acts of generating and their sources: predicting the effects of imagery encoding on false recognition errors.

Authors:  Mary Ann Foley; Emily Cowan; Emily Schlemmer; Janna Belser-Ehrlich
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2012-03-26

5.  When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Glen E Bodner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.

Authors:  M K Johnson; M A Foley; A G Suengas; C L Raye
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-12

Review 7.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Children (but not adults) can inhibit false memories.

Authors:  Mark L Howe
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-12

9.  Discriminating between memories: evidence for children's spontaneous elaborations.

Authors:  M A Foley; C Santini; M Sopasakis
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1989-08

10.  Those voices in your head: activation of auditory images during reading.

Authors:  Christopher A Kurby; Joseph P Magliano; David N Rapp
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.