Literature DB >> 31902017

Comparison of nine different selective agars for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE).

Stephan Göttig1, Sarah V Walker2,3, Ahmad Saleh2,3, Florian Koroska2, Julian Sommer1, Yvonne Stelzer2,3, Joerg Steinmann4,5, Axel Hamprecht6,7,8.   

Abstract

The rapid identification of patients colonized with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is important for infection control purposes. Here, we compared and evaluated nine different agars for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) from clinical samples. In the study, 69 CPE and 40 carbapenemase-negative isolates were included. Overall, seven commercially available screening agars were assessed: Brilliance CRE (Oxoid), Chromatic CRE (Liofilchem), chromID CARBA and chromID OXA-48 (both bioMérieux), three ESBL agars (Chromatic ESBL [Liofilchem], chromID ESBL [bioMérieux], Brilliance ESBL [Oxoid]), and two agars produced in-house (McCARB and McCARB-T). The sensitivity of CRE agars for CPE detection ranged from 34.8 to 98.6%. Brilliance CRE and McCARB/McCARB-T showed the overall highest sensitivity (98.6 and 97.1%, respectively). OXA-48 producers were the most difficult to detect; only 4/9 agars detected all isolates (McCARB/McCARB-T, Chromatic CRE, ChromID OXA-48). Additionally, all ESBL-negative OXA-48 isolates failed to grow on ESBL screening agars. Specificity ranged from 30 (Brilliance ESBL) to 100% (ChromID OXA-48). The limit of detection for different CPE in spiked stool samples ranged from 1.5 × 101 to 1.5 × 103 CFU/ml. Overall, Brilliance CRE and the McCARB in-house agars showed the best performance and were able to detect most CPE, including almost all OXA-48. ESBL agars were not suitable for detection of CPE alone, as OXA-48 isolates negative for ESBL were suppressed. The highest sensitivity was achieved by a combination of a CRE agar and an ESBL agar.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CPE; CRE; Carbapenemase; Enterobacterales; KPC; NDM; OXA-48; Screening agar plates; VIM

Year:  2020        PMID: 31902017     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-019-03786-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  13 in total

Review 1.  Intestinal Carriage of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms: Current Status of Surveillance Methods.

Authors:  Roberto Viau; Karen M Frank; Michael R Jacobs; Brigid Wilson; Keith Kaye; Curtis J Donskey; Federico Perez; Andrea Endimiani; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Use of an Enrichment Broth Improves Detection of Extended-Spectrum-Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Clinical Stool Samples.

Authors:  Nathalie Jazmati; Rebecca Hein; Axel Hamprecht
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of two rapid biochemical tests and four chromogenic selective media for detection of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Vladimira Hinić; Ivo Amrein; Sabrina Stammler; Judith Heckendorn; Dominik Meinel; Reno Frei; Adrian Egli
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.363

4.  Comparison of the SUPERCARBA, CHROMagar KPC, and Brilliance CRE screening media for detection of Enterobacteriaceae with reduced susceptibility to carbapenems.

Authors:  Delphine Girlich; Laurent Poirel; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Multiplex Immunochromatographic Detection of OXA-48, KPC, and NDM Carbapenemases: Impact of Inoculum, Antibiotics, and Agar.

Authors:  Ahmad Saleh; Stephan Göttig; Axel G Hamprecht
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of Phenotypic Tests and an Immunochromatographic Assay and Development of a New Algorithm for Detection of OXA-48-like Carbapenemases.

Authors:  Florian Koroska; Stephan Göttig; Martin Kaase; Jörg Steinmann; Sören Gatermann; Julian Sommer; Thorsten Wille; Georg Plum; Axel Hamprecht
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Detection of the carbapenemase GIM-1 in Enterobacter cloacae in Germany.

Authors:  Axel Hamprecht; Laurent Poirel; Stephan Göttig; Harald Seifert; Martin Kaase; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 8.  The Problem of Carbapenemase-Producing-Carbapenem-Resistant-Enterobacteriaceae Detection.

Authors:  Joseph D Lutgring; Brandi M Limbago
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Performance of chromID® CARBA medium for carbapenemases-producing Enterobacteriaceae detection during rectal screening.

Authors:  M Papadimitriou-Olivgeris; C Bartzavali; M Christofidou; N Bereksi; J Hey; G Zambardi; I Spiliopoulou
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Rapid detection of NDM, KPC and OXA-48 carbapenemases directly from positive blood cultures using a new multiplex immunochromatographic assay.

Authors:  Axel Hamprecht; Jörg Janne Vehreschild; Harald Seifert; Ahmad Saleh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  OXA-484, an OXA-48-Type Carbapenem-Hydrolyzing Class D β-Lactamase From Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Julian Sommer; Kristina M Gerbracht; Felix F Krause; Florian Wild; Manuela Tietgen; Sara Riedel-Christ; Janko Sattler; Axel Hamprecht; Volkhard A J Kempf; Stephan Göttig
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Comparison of stool samples and rectal swabs with and without pre-enrichment for the detection of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCREB).

Authors:  Tarek Jazmati; Axel Hamprecht; Nathalie Jazmati
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.267

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.