Literature DB >> 31900621

Aerobic capacity attainment and reasons for cardiopulmonary exercise test termination in people with cancer: a descriptive, retrospective analysis from a single laboratory.

Daniel Santa Mina1,2,3, Darren Au4,5, Efthymios Papadopoulos1,2, Meagan O'Neill2,3, Camilla Diniz1, Lianne Dolan2, Jeffrey Lipton2,3, Eugene Chang2,3, Jennifer M Jones2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Aerobic exercise prescriptions in clinical populations commonly involve target intensities based on cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET). CPETs are often discontinued prior to a patient achieving true maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max) which can adversely affect exercise dose and efficacy monitoring; however, reasons for early discontinuation are poorly reported. Accordingly, we explored the CPET termination reasons in persons with cancer participating in exercise intervention studies.
METHODS: This study comprised of an exploratory, descriptive analysis of retrospective CPET data (VO2 and anaerobic threshold) and termination reasons in a convenience sample of people with cancer participating in exercise intervention studies in a single laboratory. CPETs were standardized using the modified Bruce treadmill protocol with expired gas collection and analysis using a metabolic cart. VO2 max was considered "met" when participants demonstrated (a) oxygen consumption plateau or (b) two of the following criteria: rating of perceived exertion ≥ 9/10, respiratory exchange ratio ≥ 1.15, and/or heart rate of 95% of age-predicted maximum. The frequency and distribution of reasons for test termination relative to the number of CPET exposures for the participants were reported.
RESULTS: Forty-four participants engaged in exercise studies between February 2016 and March 2018 provided data for the analysis. Participants completed up to three CPETs during this period (total of 78 CPETs in the current analysis). Eighty-six percent of all CPETs were terminated prior to achieving VO2 max verification criteria and no tests resulted in an oxygen consumption plateau. For those that did not demonstrate achievement of VO2 max verification criteria, reasons for discontinuation were distributed as follows: equipment discomfort-49%, volitional peak-36%, and physical discomfort-14.9%. For those who met VO2 max criteria, volitional peak was the most common reason for test termination (45.5%), followed by physical discomfort (36.4%), and equipment discomfort (18.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: In our sample of cancer survivors, VO2 max criteria were infrequently met with equipment discomfort being a primary reason for participant-driven test termination. Protocol and equipment considerations are necessary for interpretation and application of CPET findings in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Cardiopulmonary exercise test; Exercise prescription; Maximum aerobic capacity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31900621     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05094-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  4 in total

1.  Safety and feasibility of symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test using the modified Naughton protocol in children with cerebral palsy: An observational study.

Authors:  Ah-Ran Kim; Min-Hwa Suk; Jeong-Yi Kwon
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Criteria for the determination of maximal oxygen uptake in patients newly diagnosed with cancer: Baseline data from the randomized controlled trial of physical training and cancer (Phys-Can).

Authors:  Ann Christin Helgesen Bjørke; Truls Raastad; Sveinung Berntsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Inter-observer agreement of preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise test interpretation in major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Ruud F W Franssen; Anne J J Eversdijk; Mayella Kuikhoven; Joost M Klaase; F Jeroen Vogelaar; Maryska L G Janssen-Heijnen; Bart C Bongers
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Exercise before, during, and after Hospitalization for Allogeneic Hematological Stem Cell Transplant: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Daniel Santa Mina; Lianne B Dolan; Jeffrey H Lipton; Darren Au; Encarna Camacho Pérez; Alyssa Franzese; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Jennifer M Jones; Eugene Chang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.