| Literature DB >> 31900305 |
Anna Sophia Harrand1, Balamurugan Jagadeesan2, Leen Baert2, Martin Wiedmann1, Renato H Orsi3.
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is becoming the standard method for subtyping Listeria monocytogenes Interpretation of WGS data for isolates from foods and associated environments is, however, challenging due to a lack of detailed data on Listeria evolution in processing facilities. Here, we used previously collected WGS data for 40 L. monocytogenes isolates obtained from a cold-smoked salmon processing facility between 1998 and 2015 to probe the L. monocytogenes molecular evolution in this facility, combined with phenotypic assessment of selected isolates. Isolates represented three clusters (1, 2, and 3); cluster 3 isolates (n = 32) were obtained over 18 years. The average mutation rate for cluster 3 was estimated as 1.15 × 10-7 changes per nucleotide per year (∼0.35 changes per genome per year); the most recent common ancestors (MRCAs) of subclusters 3a and 3b were estimated to have occurred around 1958 and 1974, respectively, within the age of the facility, suggesting long-term persistence in this facility. Extensive prophage diversity was observed within subclusters 3a and 3b, which have one shared and six unique prophage profiles for each subcluster (with 16 prophage profiles found among all 40 isolates). The plasmid-borne sanitizer tolerance operon bcrABC was found in all cluster 2 and 3 isolates, while the transposon-borne sanitizer tolerance gene qacH was found in one cluster 1 isolate; presence of these genes was correlated with the ability to survive increased concentrations of sanitizers. Selected isolates showed significant variation in the ability to attach to surfaces, with persistent isolates attaching better than transient isolates at 21°C.IMPORTANCE Knowledge about the genetic evolution of L. monocytogenes in food processing facilities over multiple years is generally lacking. This information is critical to interpret WGS findings involving food or food-associated isolates. This study suggests that L. monocytogenes that persists in processing facilities may evolve with a low single-nucleotide mutation rate mostly driven by negative (i.e., purifying) selection but with rapid diversification of prophages. Hence, isolation of L. monocytogenes with few single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) differences in different locations (e.g., supplier plants and receiving plants) is possible, highlighting the importance of epidemiological and detailed isolate metadata for interpreting WGS data in traceback investigation. Our study also shows how advanced WGS data analyses can be used to support root cause analysis efforts and may, for example, pinpoint the time when a persistence event started (which then potentially could be linked to facility changes, introduction of new equipment, etc.).Entities:
Keywords: Listeria monocytogeneszzm321990; attachment; bacteriophages; evolution; food processing facility; persistence; plasmids; sanitizer; smoked salmon; whole-genome sequencing
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31900305 PMCID: PMC7054086 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02493-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol ISSN: 0099-2240 Impact factor: 4.792
FIG 1Reference-free k-mer-based phylogenetic tree. Core SNPs identified using kSNP3 among the 42 isolates analyzed in this study plus 17 L. monocytogenes genomes downloaded from NCBI were used to construct this maximum likelihood tree. Branch lengths are proportional to the genetic distance between nodes or isolates. Bootstrap (n = 1,000) values are shown on top of the major branches. Clusters and subclusters described in Jagadeesan et al. (6), their respective sequence types (ST), and clonal complexes (CC) are annotated. An asterisk (*) after the isolate name indicates an isolate not collected in facility X. Solid boxes indicate isolates that were used for the phenotypic experiments involving (i) reduced sensitivity to four sanitizers, (ii) attachment to an abiotic surface, (iii) and growth under stress conditions. Dashed boxes indicate additional isolates added to the experiments involving (i) reduced sensitivity to the sanitizer BC and (ii) attachment to an abiotic surface. The lineages of the sequences are also annotated. The three insets show detailed depictions of the relationship within clusters 1, 2, and 3 (please note the different scales below the trees).
FIG 2Tip-dated phylogeny of cluster 3 isolates. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using BEAST, version 2.5.2. Point estimates of the year when the common ancestor existed are shown under the associated nodes. Horizontal bars at the nodes represent the 95% HPD. Branch lengths are proportional to the estimated time since divergence. Events of acquisition (pentagon), loss (square), or replacement (triangle) of prophage sequences are indicated. The prophage profiles (PP) (Table 2) are shown next to the isolates’ identification numbers. Presence (filled squares) and absence (open squares) of prophage sequences (ϕ) are shown next to the phylogenetic tree. The prophage sequence (ϕ-XIX) that is shared by polyphyletic isolates is marked with a solid blue circle. Prophages ϕ-III, ϕ-VIII, ϕ-IX, ϕ-X, ϕ-XIII, ϕ-XIV, ϕ-XV, ϕ-XVI, and ϕ-XX were not identified among cluster 3 isolates. Prophages predicted to be present in the cluster 3 and subclusters 3a and 3b MRCA are shown in parenthesis. The cluster 3 isolate (FSL N1-0051) that was not isolated in facility X is indicated by an asterisk (*) after its name.
Prophage profiles among the 42 isolates analyzed here
| Prophage profile | No. of isolates | No. of prophages | Prophage(s) | Cluster and/or subcluster(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP-A | 14 | 2 | ϕ-I, ϕ-II | Subcluster 3b |
| PP-B | 2 | 1 | ϕ-III | Cluster 2 |
| PP-C | 4 | 2 | ϕ-II, ϕ-IV | Subcluster 3b |
| PP-D | 1 | 2 | ϕ-II, ϕ-V | Subcluster 3b |
| PP-E | 3 | 1 | ϕ-II | Cluster 1, subcluster 3a, subcluster 3b |
| PP-F | 1 | 2 | ϕ-VI, ϕ-VII | Subcluster 3a |
| PP-G | 1 | 3 | ϕ-VIII, ϕ-IX, ϕ-X | Cluster 1 |
| PP-H | 1 | 2 | ϕ-II, ϕ-XI | Subcluster 3b |
| PP-I | 6 | 0 | Cluster 1 ( | |
| PP-J | 2 | 1 | ϕ-XII | Subcluster 3a |
| PP-K | 1 | 4 | ϕ-XIII, ϕ-XIV, ϕ-XV, ϕ-XVI | Cluster 1 |
| PP-L | 1 | 2 | ϕ-II, ϕ-XVII | Subcluster 3b |
| PP-M | 1 | 1 | ϕ-XVIII | Subcluster 3a |
| PP-N | 1 | 3 | ϕ-I, ϕ-II, ϕ-XIX | Subcluster 3b |
| PP-O | 1 | 1 | ϕ-XX | FSL R9-4003 (unclustered) |
| PP-P | 1 | 1 | ϕ-XXI | Subcluster 3a |
| PP-Q | 1 | 2 | ϕ-II, ϕ-XXII | Subcluster 3a |
Prophages were identified using PHASTER. Only prophages classified as questionable or intact were considered. Prophage sequences with >95% coverage and >99% identity using blastn received the same identification.
Isolates with no prophages identified were classified into profile PP-I.
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms resulting in premature stop codons
| Cluster and EGD-e homolog | Protein | Protein length with PMSC(s) (aa) | Full-length protein (aa) | Predicted location of full-length protein | Isolate(s) carrying an allele with PMSC(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster 1 | |||||
| | Internalin A | 491 | 800 | Cell wall | FSL M6-0204, FSL R6-0665, FSL R6-0670, FSL R6-0682 |
| | Internalin A | 188 | 800 | Cell wall | FSL H1-0506 |
| | Endonuclease | 683 | 782 | Cell wall | FSL H1-0506 |
| | Internalin-like protein | 549 | 611 | Cell wall | FSL M6-0204 |
| | Sodium, potassium, lithium, and rubidium/H+ antiporter | 264 | 650 | Membrane | FSL R6-0665, FSL R6-0670, FSL R6-0682 |
| | 415 | 422 | Cytoplasm | FSL N1-0013 | |
| | Hypothetical protein | 203 | 207 | Unknown | FSL R6-0665, FSL R6-0670, FSL R6-0682, FSL N1-0013, FSL H1-0506 |
| Cluster 3a | |||||
| | Unknown function | 88 | 251 | Unknown | FSL M6-1133, FSL R9-4438 |
| Cluster 3b | |||||
| | ATP-binding ABC transporter | 79 | 571 | Cell membrane | FSL M6-0306, FSL V1-0034 |
| | Iron-regulated surface determinant protein A | 4 | 569 | Cell wall | FSL N1-0256, FSL N1-0400 |
| | Thioredoxin-like protein | 78 | 157 | Extracytoplasmic | FSL M6-0755, FSL M6-0958, FSL N1-0256, FSL N1-0400 |
| Cluster 3 | |||||
| | Internalin A | 699 | 800 | Cell wall | All isolates |
| Between subclusters 3a and 3b | |||||
| | Sulfate transporter | 95 | 553 | Cell membrane | All sub-cluster 3a isolates |
| | 2-Succinyl-6-hydroxy-cyclohexadiene-1-carboxylate synthase | 319 | 325 | Cytoplasm | All sub-cluster 3b isolates |
Gene designation based on the EGD-e annotation described by Glaser et al. (93).
PMSC, premature stop codon; aa, amino acid(s).
Location predicted based on presence or absence of signal peptide, transmembrane domain, and/or cell wall-attaching domain (e.g., LPXTG).
Plasmids identified
| Cluster or subcluster | Size of plasmid (kb) | No. of predicted protein-coding genes | Plasmid replication protein group |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 62 | 61 | C |
| 2 | 77 | 81 | B |
| 3a | 67 | 68 | C |
| 3b | 81 | 88 | B |
| 58 | 61 | A | |
| FSL R9-4003 (unclustered) | 71 | 77 | A |
Size of the plasmids was determined as the sum of contigs matching the stand-alone BLAST plasmid database.
Groups were defined based on a phylogenetic analysis (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) using the extracted nucleotide sequence of the plasmid replication protein (primase protein).
Stress response accessory genes found among the three clusters
| Location and type of genetic material | Cluster, subcluster, or isolate | Predicted resistance function(s) | Reference(s) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3a | 3b | FSL R9-4003 | |||
| Plasmid-borne genes and operons | |||||||
| | − | + | + | + | + | QAC | |
| | + | − | + | + | + | Heat | |
| | − | + | − | + | + | Osmotic stress | |
| | − | + | − | + | + | Oxidative stress | |
| | + | + | + | + | + | Heavy metal | |
| | + | + | + | + | + | Heavy metal | |
| | − | − | − | + | + | Heavy metal | |
| | − | + | − | + | − | Heavy metal | |
| | − | − | − | + | + | Heavy metal | |
| | − | − | − | − | + | Heavy metal | |
| | − | − | − | − | + | Heavy metal | |
| | − | + | − | + | + | Heavy metal | |
| Chromosome-borne gene and islets | |||||||
| | FSL M6-0204 | − | − | − | − | QAC | |
| SSI-1 | − | − | + | + | + | Acidic stress and high salt concentrations | |
| SSI-2 | + | − | − | − | − | Alkaline and oxidative stress | |
Plus and minus signs indicate the presence and absence, respectively, of the element.
MICs of selected QAC sanitizers
| Strain | Cluster or subcluster | Gene(s) | MIC (mg/liter) of | Weiquat MIC (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | BZT | CPC | ||||
| FSL H1-0506 | 1 | None | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.001 |
| FSL M6-0204 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0.004 | |
| FSL H1-0322 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 0.004 | |
| FSL T1-0027 | 3a | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0.004 | |
| FSL T1-0077 | 3b | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0.004 | |
The MIC is defined as the value at which no growth was detected (at the detection threshold of an OD600 of 0.15) for any of the three biological replicates after 24 h of incubation. BC, benzalkonium chloride; BZT, benzethonium chloride; CPC, cetylpyridinium chloride.
One of three biological replicates passed the detection threshold at 3 mg/liter BC.
One of three biological replicates passed the detection threshold at 6 mg/liter BZT.
One of three biological replicates passed the detection threshold at 2 mg/liter CPC.
One of three biological replicates passed the detection threshold at 0.003% Weiquat.
FIG 3Attachment by cluster. Estimated marginal means of absorbance measured at an OD600 by cluster (x axis) at 10°C and 21°C. Colors match the letter codes that are based on post hoc Tukey analysis; data points that do not share the same letter are significantly different. The bars indicate the estimated upper and lower 95% confidence intervals based on the linear mixed regression model with three biological replicates.
Primers used to target genes on mobile elements
| Primer | Target | Sequence 5′→3′ | Annealing temp (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| clpL-F | GGATAATCAAAATTCGGAGCGTGC | 56 | |
| clpL-R | TCATTCTCACGTCCAATCACTGG | ||
| Tn6188qac-F | CACTTGCTTTATGATCAGGTTCTCC | 56 | |
| Tn6188qac-R | GGGGGAAATTATTGGCTCTTCC | ||
| bcrABC-F | CAAAAGGAGGGTAATCATGTCAGC | 66 | |
| bcrABC-R | GACAATTTAAGTACCACAACACCAGC |
This study is the source for all primers.
Twenty cycles with each cycle at −0.5°C and 20 final cycles at 56°C.