Ratchada Kitsommart1, Narongrit Thammawong1, Kanokwan Sommai2, Jittiyaporn Yangnoy1, Walaiporn Bowornkitiwong1, Bosco Paes3. 1. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. 3. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term outcomes of infants born with thick versus thin meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) and to perform a systematic review of the topic. METHODS: A retrospective, single center, cohort study of infants' ≥34 weeks' gestation born with MSAF between 1 June 2013 and 30 September 2016. Birth resuscitation and respiratory outcomes were compared between the groups. A systematic review was conducted of similar studies published between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2019. RESULTS: 1507 infants were eligible; 464 (30.8%) thick, 1,043 (69.2%) thin MSAF. The thick group required more respiratory support at birth and was 5.5-fold (95% CI: 2.51-11.95) more likely to and have meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) and 2.1-fold more likely (95% CI: 0.89-4.83) to require either noninvasive respiratory support or intubation than the thin group. The thick group also had significantly higher oxygen supplementation >24 h (p < .001) and pneumothorax (p = .002). Across 12 studies included in the systematic review, infants with thick MSAF required more intensive birth resuscitation, ventilation support, with higher incidences of MAS. Study differences prohibited data comparisons and quantitative outcome evaluations. CONCLUSION: Infants with thick MSAF required more intensive birth resuscitation and ventilation support. Our findings need confirmation in robust, prospective cohort studies.
OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term outcomes of infants born with thick versus thin meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) and to perform a systematic review of the topic. METHODS: A retrospective, single center, cohort study of infants' ≥34 weeks' gestation born with MSAF between 1 June 2013 and 30 September 2016. Birth resuscitation and respiratory outcomes were compared between the groups. A systematic review was conducted of similar studies published between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2019. RESULTS: 1507 infants were eligible; 464 (30.8%) thick, 1,043 (69.2%) thin MSAF. The thick group required more respiratory support at birth and was 5.5-fold (95% CI: 2.51-11.95) more likely to and have meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) and 2.1-fold more likely (95% CI: 0.89-4.83) to require either noninvasive respiratory support or intubation than the thin group. The thick group also had significantly higher oxygen supplementation >24 h (p < .001) and pneumothorax (p = .002). Across 12 studies included in the systematic review, infants with thick MSAF required more intensive birth resuscitation, ventilation support, with higher incidences of MAS. Study differences prohibited data comparisons and quantitative outcome evaluations. CONCLUSION: Infants with thick MSAF required more intensive birth resuscitation and ventilation support. Our findings need confirmation in robust, prospective cohort studies.
Authors: Chiara Monfredini; Francesco Cavallin; Paolo Ernesto Villani; Giuseppe Paterlini; Benedetta Allais; Daniele Trevisanuto Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2021-03-17