| Literature DB >> 31899914 |
Huiyu Huang1, Yong Zhang1, Jingliang Cheng1, Weijian Wang1, Mengmeng Wen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) method was used to investigate the changes of white matter microstructure in tobacco addicts, and to analyze its correlation with smoking index, smoking years, and daily smoking amount. MATERIAL AND METHODS Routine magnetic resonance imaging (excluding intracranial lesions) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequence scanning were performed in 156 nicotine addicts (nicotine dependence group) and 81 non-nicotine addicts (control group) recruited from the study group. TBSS method was used to preprocess DTI data, and age and education level were taken as covariables to statistically analyze relevant parameters between nicotine dependence group and control group, such as fractional anisotropy (FA) value and smoking index. Spearman correlation analysis was performed on smoking status and FA values in brain regions with significant differences between nicotine dependent group and control group, and the test level alpha was 0.05. RESULTS Compared with control group, FA values of white matter in part of the posterior limb of the right inner capsule (r=-0.428, P=0.003), the right superior radiating crown (r=-0.136, P=0.004), the right posterior radiating crown (r=-0.229, P=0.003), the right superior longitudinal bundle (r=-0.474, P=0.002), the right inferior longitudinal bundle (r=-0.354, P=0.003) and the inferior frontal occipital bundle (r=-0.310, P=0.002) were decreased, which were negatively correlated with smoking index (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Nicotine can damage the microstructure of white matter in specific brain regions and damage neurons, with cumulative effects.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31899914 PMCID: PMC6977634 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.919105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1DTI image data processing flow chart. DTI – diffusion tensor imaging; TBSS – tract-based spatial statistics; FA – fractional anisotropy; MNI – Montreal Neurological Institute.
Basic information of subjects.
| Group | χ̄±s | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nicotine dependence group (n=156) | Control group (n=81) | ||
| Gender (Male/Female) | 156/0 | 81/0 | 1.00 |
| Age (years) | 37.7±6.9 | 36.1±7.6 | 0.10 |
| Education year (years) | 13.1±3.9 | 12.3±4.5 | 0.15 |
There is a significant difference at P<0.05.
Smoking related data in nicotine dependence group.
| Smoking-related characteristics | χ̄±s |
|---|---|
| Initial smoking age (years) | 17.4±2.8 |
| Age span of initial smoking (years) | 11–25 |
| Smoking years (years) | 20.0±7.4 |
| Smoking years span (years) | 3–39 |
| Daily smoking amount (cigarette/day) | 21.9±6.7 |
| Daily smoking amount span (cigarette/day) | 10–40 |
| FTND (point) | 4.3±2.0 |
| FTND span (point) | 1–10 |
| Smoking index (daily smoking amount×smoking years/20) | 22.1±11.7 |
| Smoking index span | 1.8–72.0 |
FTND – Fagerstrom nicotine dependence test.
Figure 2Differences in brain regions between nicotine dependence group and control group. The yellow represented the average FA skeleton and the blue represented the white matter fiber bundle skeleton area with decreased FA value. FA – fractional anisotropy.
Correlation analysis of FA value and smoking status between nicotine dependence group and control group.
| Brain regions | Smoking year | Daily smoking amount | Smoking index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The posterior limb of the right inner capsule | r | −0.351 | −0.342 | −0.428 |
| P | 0.003* | 0.004* | 0.003* | |
| The right superior radiating crown | r | −0.237 | −0.226 | −0.136 |
| P | 0.001* | 0.002* | 0.001* | |
| The right posterior radiating crown | r | −0.384 | −0.272 | −0.229 |
| P | 0.004* | 0.002* | 0.003* | |
| The right superior longitudinal bundle | r | −0.317 | −0.403 | −0.474 |
| P | 0.003* | 0.002* | 0.002* | |
| The right inferior longitudinal bundle | r | −0.358 | −0.296 | −0.354 |
| P | 0.004* | 0.002* | 0.003* | |
| The inferior frontal occipital bundle | r | −0.327 | −0.364 | −0.310 |
| P | 0.003* | 0.001* | 0.002* |
r – correlation; P – significance.