| Literature DB >> 31899772 |
Tshering Dukpa1, Nidup Dorji1, Sangay Thinley2, Karma Tshering3, Kinley Gyem4, Diki Wangmo1, Passang Lhamo Sherpa1, Tshering Dorji5, Antonio Montresor6.
Abstract
Soil Transmitted Helminth (STH) infections affect over 1.5 billion people worldwide. Although prevalent in all age groups, school aged children are a high-risk groups for STH infections. In Bhutan, epidemiological data on STH were collected from western Bhutan in 2003, which found a prevalence of 16.5%. However, little evidence is available on the prevalence of infection at national level. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim to assess the prevalence and intensity of STH infections, and identify significant correlates of STH among students. A school-based survey was conducted in three regions of Bhutan. Two-stage cluster sampling was adopted to select a sample of 1500 students from 24 schools, in equal proportion from three regions of the country. A total of 1456 (97%) students were interviewed and their stool sample examined for the presence of parasites. Mini-FLOTAC technique was used to detect the parasite eggs/ova. The prevalence of any STH infection was 1.4%, with 0.8% Ascaris lumbricoides, 0.5% Trichuris trichiura and 0.2% hookworms. The eastern region had the highest prevalence at 2.3%. Except for one student who had moderate intensity of A. lumbricoides, the rest had light infection. Any STH presence was significantly associated with father's occupation, father's education level, type of house and the flooring of the house in which students reported to live. No significant associations were observed between water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) variables measured and presence of any STH infection. The prevalence of STH was found to be very low with primarily light intensity in this study. Nonetheless, it was also found that the sanitation situation is not ideal in the country, with several students reporting constant or partial open defecation leading to environmental contamination. Based on this prevalence and in line with the WHO guideline, it is recommended that deworming be reduced to once a year in combination with concerted health education on proper hygiene and sanitation practice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31899772 PMCID: PMC6941809 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Decision tree for administration of preventive chemotherapy in treated population.
Adapted from Helminth control in school-age children: a guide for managers of control programmes, World Health Organization, 2011.
Summary findings from 2003 STH study among students in western Bhutan.
| Total sample(n = 266) | Schools treated in the last three months (n = 104) | Schools not treated in the last three months (n = 162) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence | Moderate heavy intensity | Prevalence | Moderate heavy intensity | Prevalence | Moderate heavy intensity | |
| 12.8% | 3.0% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 19.8% | 4.0% | |
| 5.6% | - | 2.9% | -- | 7.4% | -- | |
| Hookworm | 1.1% | - | - | -- | 1.9% | -- |
| Prevalence of any STH infection | 16.5% | 3.0% | 4.8% | 1.3% | 24% | 4.0% |
| 6.7% | NA | 0 | NA | 11.0% | NA | |
Credit: Allen H, Sithey G, Padmasiri EA, and Montresor A. Epidemiology of soil-transmitted helminths in the western region of Bhutan. The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health. 2004;35(4):777–9
Fig 2Location of schools sampled from different regions of Bhutan, 2017.
Adapted from The World Factbook–Bhutan, Central Intelligence Agency, 2019.
Classification of intensity of soil transmitted helminths infection .
| Parasite | Light-intensity | Moderate-intensity infection | Heavy-intensity infection |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1–4 999 epg | 5000–49 999 epg | ≥ 50000 epg | |
| 1–999 epg | 1000–9 999 epg | ≥ 10000 epg | |
| Hookworms | 1–1 999 egp | 2000–3 999 epg | ≥ 4000 epg |
a Adapted from: World Health Organization. Helminth control in school-age children: a guide for managers of control programmes, World Health Organization; 2011.
b epg = eggs per gram of feces
Socio-demographic characteristics of students in the sample investigated for STH in Bhutan, 2017 (n = 1456).
| Socio-demographic characteristics | Measurement | n | (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | <12 years | 669 | (45.9) |
| ≥12 years | 787 | ((54.1) | |
| Mean = 11.9 | SD = 2.2 | Median = 12.0 | Min-Max = 7–20 |
| Sex | Male | 693 | (47.6) |
| Female | 763 | (52.4) | |
| Grade | grade 3 | 237 | (16.3) |
| grade 4 | 240 | (16.5) | |
| grade 5 | 246 | (16.9) | |
| grade 6 | 246 | (16.9) | |
| grade 7 | 242 | (16.6) | |
| grade 8 | 245 | (16.8) | |
| Ethnicity | Ngalop | 293 | (20.1) |
| Sharchop | 689 | (47.2) | |
| Lhotsam | 252 | (17.2) | |
| Kheng-Bumthap | 222 | (15.3) | |
| Father’s occupation | Farmer | 605 | (41.6) |
| Salaried | 704 | (50.8) | |
| Don’t know | 111 | (7.6) | |
| Mother’s occupation | Farmer | 702 | (48.2) |
| Salaried | 734 | (50.4) | |
| Don’t know | 20 | (1.4) | |
| Father’s education | Illiterate | 392 | (26.9) |
| Primary school | 359 | (24.7) | |
| High school | 231 | (15.9) | |
| College/ University | 131 | (9.0) | |
| Others | 343 | (23.6) | |
| Mother’s education | Illiterate | 585 | (40.2) |
| Primary school | 280 | (19.2) | |
| High school | 183 | (12.6) | |
| College/ University | 35 | (2.4) | |
| Others | 373 | (25.6) | |
| School type | Lower Secondary School | 787 | (54.1) |
| Middle Secondary School | 179 | (12.3) | |
| Higher Secondary School | 59 | (4.1) | |
| Central School | 431 | (29.6) | |
| Type of student | Boarding student | 309 | (21.2) |
| Day scholar | 1147 | (78.8) | |
| House type | Hut | 208 | (14.3) |
| Stone house | 576 | (39.6) | |
| Mud house | 181 | (12.4) | |
| Modern concrete | 491 | (33.7) | |
| Flooring type | Mud flooring | 74 | (5.1) |
| Concrete /tile flooring | 580 | (39.8) | |
| Others | 802 | (55.1) |
Non-formal education, Monastic education, Don’t know
Bamboo, Planks
WASH behavioral characteristics of students in the sample investigated for STH in Bhutan, 2017 (n = 1456).
| WASH items | Measurement | (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drinking tap water | Never | 18 | (1.2) |
| Sometimes | 645 | (44.4) | |
| Always | 793 | (54.5) | |
| Drinking water from stream/ river | Never | 966 | (66.4) |
| Sometimes | 484 | (33.2) | |
| Always | 6 | (0.4) | |
| Drinking rain water | Never | 1351 | (92.8) |
| Sometimes | 105 | (7.2) | |
| Always | 0 | (0.0) | |
| Drinking water from pond | Never | 1288 | (88.5) |
| Sometimes | 168 | (11.5) | |
| Always | 0 | (00.0) | |
| Drinking boiled water | Never | 83 | (5.7) |
| Sometimes | 1093 | (75.1) | |
| Always | 280 | (19.2) | |
| Drinking filtered water | Never | 320 | (22.0) |
| Sometimes | 882 | (60.6) | |
| Always | 254 | (17.5) | |
| Cleanliness of toilet at school | Never | 35 | (2.4) |
| Sometimes | 1225 | (84.1) | |
| Always | 196 | (13.5) | |
| Using flush toilet | Never | 20 | (1.4) |
| Sometimes | 857 | (58.9) | |
| Always | 579 | (39.8) | |
| Using pit latrine | Never | 803 | (55.2) |
| Sometimes | 593 | (40.7) | |
| Always | 60 | (4.1) | |
| Practicing open defecation | Never | 460 | (31.6) |
| Sometimes | 984 | (67.6) | |
| Always | 12 | (0.8) | |
| Availability of water for hand washing at school | Never | 4 | (0.3) |
| Sometimes | 923 | (63.4) | |
| Always | 529 | (36.3) | |
| Availability of soap for hand washing at school | Never | 153 | (10.5) |
| Sometimes | 935 | (64.2) | |
| Always | 368 | (25.3) | |
| Washing hand before meal | Never | 19 | (1.3) |
| Sometimes | 822 | (56.5) | |
| Always | 615 | (42.2) | |
| Using soap while washing hand | Never | 15 | (1.0) |
| Sometimes | 1093 | (75.1) | |
| Always | 384 | (23.9) | |
| Washing hand after defecation | Never | 32 | (2.2) |
| Sometimes | 775 | (53.2) | |
| Always | 649 | (44.6) | |
| Engaging in agricultural work | Never | 88 | (6.0) |
| Sometimes | 1232 | (84.6) | |
| Always | 136 | (9.3) | |
| Wearing foot wear outside house | Never | 62 | (4.3) |
| Sometimes | 721 | (49.5) | |
| Always | 673 | (46.2) | |
| Washing fruits before consuming | Never | 51 | (3.5) |
| Sometimes | 906 | (62.2) | |
| Always | 499 | (34.3) | |
| Using spoon for eating food | Never | 56 | (3.9) |
| Sometimes | 972 | (66.8) | |
| Always | 428 | (29.4) | |
| Keeping nail short | Never | 4 | (0.3) |
| Sometimes | 633 | (43.5) | |
| Always | 819 | (56.3) |
Prevalence of soil-transmitted helminths infection among students in the sample investigated for STH in Bhutan, 2017 (n = 1456).
| Number | Prevalence | Number | Prevalence | Number | Prevalence | Number | Prevalence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | (95% CI) | Positive | (95% CI) | Positive | (95% CI) | Number | (95% CI) | |
| 21 | 1.4 (0.8–2.0) | 11 | 2.3 (0.9–3.6) | 7 | 1.4 (0.4–2.4) | 3 | 0.6 (0.0–1.3) | |
| 11 | 0.8 (0.3–1.2) | 9 | 1.9 (0.7–3.1) | 2 | 0.4 (0.0–0.9) | 0 | - | |
| 8 | 0.5 (0.2–0.9) | 2 | 0.4 (0.0–0.9) | 3 | 0.6 (0.0–1.3) | 3 | 0.6 (0.0–1.3) | |
| 3 | 0.2 (0.0–0.4) | 0 | - | 3 | 0.6 (0.0–1.3) | 0 | - | |
| 3 | 0.2 (0.1–0.6) | 0 | - | 1 | 0.2 (0.1–1.4) | 2 | 0.4 (0.1–1.7) | |
*2 Taenia solium and 1 Hymenolepis nana
** one student had double infection (A. lumbrioides & T trichiura)
Intensity of soil-transmitted helminths infection among students in the sample investigated for STH in Bhutan, 2017 (n = 1456).
| Types of helminthes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | M | H | L | M | H | L | M | H | L | M n(%) | H | |
| 10 (90.9) | 1(9.1) | - | 8 (88.9) | 1 (11.1) | - | - | - | - | 2 (100.0) | - | - | |
| 8 (100.0) | - | - | 2 (100.0) | - | - | 3 (100.0) | - | - | 3 (100.0) | - | - | |
| Hookworms | 3 (100.0) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 (100.0) | - | - |
Normal range: Light(L) = 1–4 999 epg; Moderate(M) = 5000–49 999epg; Heavy(H) = ≥50 000 epg
Normal range: Light(L) = 1–999 epg; Moderate(M) = 1000–9 999epg; Heavy(H) = ≥10 000 epg
Normal range: Light(L) = 1–1 999 epg; Moderate(M) = 2000–3 999epg; Heavy(H) = ≥4 000 epg
Relationship between socio-demographic characteristics and presence of soil-transmitted helminthes among students in Bhutan, 2017(n = 1456).
| Socio-demographic | Students Examined | Presence of any STH | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | χ2 | p-value | |
| Sex | ||||
| Female | 763 (52.4) | 11 (1.4) | 0.00 | 0.998 |
| Male | 693 (47.6) | 10 (1.4) | ||
| Age | ||||
| <12 years | 669 (45.9) | 13 (1.9) | 2.1845 | 0.139 |
| ≥ 12 years | 787 (54.1) | 8 (1.0) | ||
| School setting | ||||
| Rural | 731 (50.2) | 13 (1.8) | 1.1665 | 0.280 |
| Urban | 725 (49.8) | 8 (1.1) | ||
| Type of Student | ||||
| Boarding | 309 (21.2) | 5 (1.6) | 0.0853 | 0.770 |
| Day scholar | 1147 (78.8) | 16 (1.4) | ||
| Father’s Occupation | ||||
| Farmer | 605 (41.1) | 15 (71.4) | - | 0.022 |
| Salaried | 740 (51.2) | 6 (28.6) | - | |
| Don’t know | 111 (7.7) | 0 (0.0) | - | |
| Mother’s Occupation | ||||
| Farmer | 702 (48.2) | 15 (71.4) | - | 0.107 |
| Salaried | 734 (50.4) | 6 (28.6) | - | |
| Don’t know | 20 (1.6) | 0 (0.0) | - | |
| Father’s education | ||||
| Illiterate | 392 (26.9) | 12 (57.1) | - | 0.040 |
| Primary school | 359 (24.7) | 4 (19.1) | - | |
| High school | 231 (15.9) | 1 (4.8) | - | |
| College/University | 131 (9.0) | 2 (9.5) | - | |
| Others | 343 (23.6) | 2 (9.5) | - | |
| Mother’s education | ||||
| Illiterate | 585 (40.2) | 15 (71.4) | - | 0.097 |
| Primary school | 280 (19.2) | 3 (14.3) | ||
| High school | 183 (12.6) | 1 (4.8) | - | |
| College/university | 35 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | - | |
| Don’t know | 373 (25.6) | 2 (9.5) | - | |
| Flooring type | ||||
| Mud | 74 (5.1) | 0 (0.0) | - | 0.018 |
| Concrete/tile | 580 (39.8) | 3 (14.3) | - | |
| Others | 802 (55.1) | 18 (85.7) | - | |
| House type | ||||
| Hut | 208 (14.3) | 2 (9.5) | 12.2731 | 0.007 |
| Stone house | 576 (39.6) | 16 (76.2) | ||
| Mud house | 181 (12.4) | 1 (4.8) | ||
| Modern concrete house | 491 (33.7) | 2 (9.5) | ||
* Fisher’s exact
Non-Formal Education, Monastic education, Don’t know
Bamboo, Plank