Susan W Buchholz1, JoEllen Wilbur2, Shannon Halloway2, Michael Schoeny2, Tricia Johnson3, Sachin Vispute2, Spyros Kitsiou4. 1. Rush University, College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Electronic address: susan_buchholz@rush.edu. 2. Rush University, College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, United States of America. 3. Rush University, College of Health Sciences, Chicago, IL, United States of America. 4. University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Applied Health Sciences, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Physical activity monitors, motivational text messages, personal calls, and group meetings, have proven to be efficacious physical activity interventions. However, individual participant response to these interventions varies drastically. A SMART design (sequential multiple assignment randomized trial) provides an effective way to test interventions that start with an initial treatment and then transition to an augmented treatment for non-responders. We describe a SMART to determine the most effective adaptive intervention to increase physical activity (steps, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) and improve cardiovascular health among employed women who are not regularly physically active. The SMART uses combinations of four treatments: 1) enhanced physical activity monitor (Fitbit wearable activity monitor and mobile app with goal setting and physical activity prescription), 2) text messages, 3) personal calls, and 4) group meetings. METHODS:Participants (N = 312) include women ages 18-70 employed at a large academic medical center. Women will be randomized to an initial intervention, either an enhanced physical activity monitor or enhanced physical activity monitor + text messaging. Non-responders to the initial intervention at 2 months will be randomized to either personal calls or groups meetings for the next 6 months. At 8 months, all participants will return to only an enhanced physical activity monitor until their final 12-month assessment. DISCUSSION: Results of this study will add to the literature on improving physical activity in employed women. This study will identify effective interventions for women who respond to less intensive treatments, while maximizing benefits for those who need a more intensive approach.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Physical activity monitors, motivational text messages, personal calls, and group meetings, have proven to be efficacious physical activity interventions. However, individual participant response to these interventions varies drastically. A SMART design (sequential multiple assignment randomized trial) provides an effective way to test interventions that start with an initial treatment and then transition to an augmented treatment for non-responders. We describe a SMART to determine the most effective adaptive intervention to increase physical activity (steps, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) and improve cardiovascular health among employed women who are not regularly physically active. The SMART uses combinations of four treatments: 1) enhanced physical activity monitor (Fitbit wearable activity monitor and mobile app with goal setting and physical activity prescription), 2) text messages, 3) personal calls, and 4) group meetings. METHODS:Participants (N = 312) include women ages 18-70 employed at a large academic medical center. Women will be randomized to an initial intervention, either an enhanced physical activity monitor or enhanced physical activity monitor + text messaging. Non-responders to the initial intervention at 2 months will be randomized to either personal calls or groups meetings for the next 6 months. At 8 months, all participants will return to only an enhanced physical activity monitor until their final 12-month assessment. DISCUSSION: Results of this study will add to the literature on improving physical activity in employed women. This study will identify effective interventions for women who respond to less intensive treatments, while maximizing benefits for those who need a more intensive approach.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Jean C McSweeney; Anne G Rosenfeld; Willie M Abel; Lynne T Braun; Lora E Burke; Stacie L Daugherty; Gerald F Fletcher; Martha Gulati; Laxmi S Mehta; Christina Pettey; Jane F Reckelhoff Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Joellen Wilbur; Susan W Buchholz; Diana M Ingram; Lynne T Braun; Tricia J Johnson; Louis Fogg; Arlene M Miller; Annabelle S Volgman; Judith McDevitt Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Ralph Maddison; Leila Pfaeffli; Ralph Stewart; Andrew Kerr; Yannan Jiang; Jonathan Rawstorn; Karen Carter; Robyn Whittaker Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2014-05-27
Authors: Heather M Prendergast; Renee Petzel-Gimbar; Spyros Kitsiou; Marina Del Rios; Brenda Lara; Maya Jackson; Sara Heinert; Barry L Carter; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu; Martha Daviglus Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Spyros Kitsiou; Ben S Gerber; Mayank M Kansal; Susan W Buchholz; Jinsong Chen; Todd Ruppar; Jasmine Arrington; Ayomide Owoyemi; Jonathan Leigh; Susan J Pressler Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 2.261
Authors: Guilherme M Balbim; Spyros Kitsiou; Sharmilee M Nyenhuis; Isabela G Marques; David X Marquez; Darshilmukesh Patel; Lisa K Sharp Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 4.773