Test-retest of automated segmentation with different motion correction strategies: A comparison of prospective versus retrospective methods.

Test-retest of automated image segmentation algorithms (FSL FAST, FSL FIRST, and FREESURFER) are computed on magnetic resonance images from 12 unsedated children aged 9.4±2.6 years ([min,max] ​= ​[6.5 years, 13.8 years]) using different approaches to motion correction (prospective versus retrospective). The prospective technique, PROMO MPRAGE, dynamically estimates motion using specially acquired navigator images and adjusts the remaining acquisition accordingly, whereas the retrospective technique, MPnRAGE, uses a self-navigation property to retrospectively estimate and account for motion during image reconstruction. To increase the likelihood and range of motions, participants heads were not stabilized with padding during repeated scans. When motion was negligible both techniques had similar performance. When motion was not negligible, the automated image segmentation and anatomical labeling software tools showed the most consistent performance with the retrospectively corrected MPnRAGE technique (≥80% volume overlaps for 15 of 16 regions for FIRST and FREESURFER, with greater than 90% volume overlaps for 12 regions with FIRST and 11 regions with FREESURFER). Prospectively corrected MPRAGE with linear view-ordering also demonstrated lower performance than MPnRAGE without retrospective motion correction.