Literature DB >> 31899094

Psychosocial factors affecting outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Sravya P Vajapey1, Gregory L Cvetanovich1, Julie Y Bishop1, Andrew S Neviaser2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are considered successful surgeries to treat a variety of painful shoulder conditions. Although implant survivorship for both is good to excellent in the long term, a variety of factors-clinical, technical, and psychosocial-may affect patient-reported outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty.
METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed systematically using keywords "shoulder arthroplasty outcomes," "psychosocial factors shoulder," "shoulder replacement outcomes," "depression shoulder arthroplasty," "satisfaction shoulder arthroplasty," "factors shoulder replacement," "expectations shoulder arthroplasty," and "predictors shoulder arthroplasty." Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were screened and analyzed. Type of surgery performed, sample size, outcome measures, and other factors influencing patient outcomes were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Six reviewed mental health disorders as predictors of postoperative outcome after shoulder arthroplasty. Of these, 4 found that disorders such a depression and anxiety were associated with increased risk of perioperative complications and lower final functional outcome scores. Two studies evaluated workers' compensation status as a possible predictor of outcomes and found that patients with claims had lower satisfaction and outcome scores at final follow-up compared with those without claims. Two studies showed that preoperative opioid use was associated with lower outcome scores and overall satisfaction rate after shoulder arthroplasty. Three studies showed that higher patient confidence and preoperative expectations were correlated with better outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Our review shows that psychosocial factors may play just as important role in affecting patient outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty as technical factors.
Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shoulder arthroplasty; arthroplasty outcomes; predictors prognosis; psychosocial factors; shoulder replacement; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31899094     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  5 in total

1.  Higher preoperative expectations predict better outcomes in shoulder surgery patients.

Authors:  Samir Kaveeshwar; Kali N Stevens; Dominic J Ventimiglia; Tina Zhang; Matheus B Schneider; Leah E Henry; S Ashfaq Hasan; Mohit N Gilotra; R Henn Frank
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: How Is the Probability of Reporting Various Levels of Pain 12 Months After Noncatastrophic Injuries Associated with the Level of Peritraumatic Distress?

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for patients with preserved active elevation and moderate-to-severe pain: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  M Tyrrell Burrus; Patrick J Denard; Evan Lederman; Reuben Gobezie; Brian C Werner
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-11-19

4.  Return to work following shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  Simon P Lalehzarian; Avinesh Agarwalla; Joseph N Liu
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-18

5.  Return to Work After Pectoralis Major Repair.

Authors:  Avinesh Agarwalla; Anirudh K Gowd; Joseph N Liu; Grant H Garcia; Gregory P Nicholson; Brian Forsythe; Anthony A Romeo; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-12-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.