Literature DB >> 31898649

Dosimetric comparison of 60Co and 192Ir high dose rate source used in brachytherapy treatment of cervical cancer.

Arvind Kumar Shukla1, Pawan Kumar Jangid1, Vikram Singh Rajpurohit1, Atul Verma1, Suresh Kumar Dangayach1, Vaibhav Gagrani1, Narendra Kumar Rathore1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study purpose included dosimetric comparison of cobalt 60 (60Co) and iridium 192 (192Ir) high dose rate (HDR) source used in brachytherapy treatment of cervical cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans for 15 patients of carcinoma of uterine cervix using 3-mm slice thickness were considered for the study The contouring of high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV), bladder, and rectum on CT images was done as per the GEC ESTRO guidelines with the help of magnetic resonance imaging images in the treatment planning system. All parameters were kept the same for 60Co (3.5 mm active length, 0.5 mm active dia, Bebig) and 192Ir (3.5 mm active length, 0.6 mm active dia, Bebig) HDR source with 2.5-mm step size and dose prescription to Point A. As per the International Commission on Radiation Unit (ICRU)-89 guidelines, the dose-volume parameters such as D50(Gy), D90(Gy), and D98(Gy) for HRCTV and D0.1cc (Gy), D1cc (Gy), D2cc (Gy), and D5cc (Gy) to the bladder and rectum were calculated for both the HDR sources.
RESULTS: The difference in dose-volume histogram parameters such as D50,D90,and D98 of HRCTV was 3.19%, 1.13%, and 0.50%, respectively, for the two radioisotopes. The difference in dose values of D0.1cc, D1cc, D2cc, D5cc, and ICRU reference points of bladder was -0.58%, -0.67%, -0.99%, -0.94%, and -1.75%, respectively. On the other hand, dose difference for D0.1cc, D1cc, D2cc, D5cc, and ICRU reference points of rectum was 0.67%, 0.26%, 0.56%, 0.63%, and -0.33%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study results show that all the dose parameters of HRCTV, bladder, and rectum with 60Co were comparable with those of 192Ir HDR source. The isodose distribution is more bulge out for 60Co in cranial-caudal direction compared to that of 192Ir. However, these differences can be reduced by treatment planning optimization techniques. The clinical plan evaluation in each slice and plane is necessary to explore the logistic and financial benefits of miniaturized 60Co source over 192Ir HDR source.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brachytherapy; cervical cancer; cobalt-60 source; high dose rate; iridium-192 source

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31898649     DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_372_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther        ISSN: 1998-4138            Impact factor:   1.805


  2 in total

1.  BEBIG 60Co HDR brachytherapy source dosimetric parameters validation using GATE Geant4-based simulation code.

Authors:  Musa Joya; Hassan Ali Nedaie; Ghazale Geraily; Mahdi Ghorbani; Peyman Sheikhzadeh; Mahmud Naraqi Arani
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-03-27

Review 2.  Comparative Analysis of 60Co and 192Ir Sources in High Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Aiping Wen; Xianliang Wang; Bingjie Wang; Chuanjun Yan; Jingyue Luo; Pei Wang; Jie Li
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.575

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.