Tianyi Lu1, Rebecca Myerson2. 1. University of Southern California (USC) School of Pharmacy and Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. rmyerson@wisc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the USA, people with limited English proficiency (LEP) disproportionately experience gaps in health insurance coverage and access to care. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 included reforms that could improve these outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To describe changes in insurance coverage and access to health care by English language proficiency over 2006-2016. DESIGN: We used regression models to estimate changes in coverage and access after 2010 for adults with high vs. limited English proficiency, adjusting for socio-economic status, demographic characteristics, and health care needs. We used difference-in-differences models to assess adjusted changes in disparities by English proficiency after 2010. Supplemental analyses used nearest-neighbor propensity score matching to balance the characteristics of respondents. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents aged 18-64 in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey over 2006-2016, with high (n = 174,214) or limited (n = 16,484) English language proficiency. MAIN MEASURES: Insurance coverage was a binary variable indicating any health insurance coverage during the past 12 months. Access to care was measured using binary variables indicating whether the respondent had a usual source of care and received necessary medical, dental, and preventive care. KEY RESULTS: Gains in health insurance coverage after 2010 were significant for adults with high English proficiency (1.7 percentage points, p < 0.001) and adults with limited English proficiency (4.6 percentage points, p = 0.007); gains did not significantly vary by English proficiency. Adults with LEP showed larger improvements than adults with high English proficiency in having a usual source of care (5 percentage points, p = 0.007) and receiving needed medical care and dental care (1.4 percentage points, p = 0.013, and 2.8 percentage points, p = 0.009, respectively). Findings remained similar when matching was used to balance the measured characteristics of respondents with high vs. limited English proficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in health care access by English proficiency narrowed after 2010, the year of passage of the ACA.
BACKGROUND: In the USA, people with limited English proficiency (LEP) disproportionately experience gaps in health insurance coverage and access to care. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 included reforms that could improve these outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To describe changes in insurance coverage and access to health care by English language proficiency over 2006-2016. DESIGN: We used regression models to estimate changes in coverage and access after 2010 for adults with high vs. limited English proficiency, adjusting for socio-economic status, demographic characteristics, and health care needs. We used difference-in-differences models to assess adjusted changes in disparities by English proficiency after 2010. Supplemental analyses used nearest-neighbor propensity score matching to balance the characteristics of respondents. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents aged 18-64 in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey over 2006-2016, with high (n = 174,214) or limited (n = 16,484) English language proficiency. MAIN MEASURES: Insurance coverage was a binary variable indicating any health insurance coverage during the past 12 months. Access to care was measured using binary variables indicating whether the respondent had a usual source of care and received necessary medical, dental, and preventive care. KEY RESULTS: Gains in health insurance coverage after 2010 were significant for adults with high English proficiency (1.7 percentage points, p < 0.001) and adults with limited English proficiency (4.6 percentage points, p = 0.007); gains did not significantly vary by English proficiency. Adults with LEP showed larger improvements than adults with high English proficiency in having a usual source of care (5 percentage points, p = 0.007) and receiving needed medical care and dental care (1.4 percentage points, p = 0.013, and 2.8 percentage points, p = 0.009, respectively). Findings remained similar when matching was used to balance the measured characteristics of respondents with high vs. limited English proficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in health care access by English proficiency narrowed after 2010, the year of passage of the ACA.
Entities:
Keywords:
English proficiency; access to care; disparities; health insurance; health policy
Authors: S T Normand; M B Landrum; E Guadagnoli; J Z Ayanian; T J Ryan; P D Cleary; B J McNeil Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Gerardo Moreno; Elizabeth H Lin; Eva Chang; Ron L Johnson; Heidi Berthoud; Cam C Solomon; Leo S Morales Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Eun Ji Kim; Taekyu Kim; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Adam J Rose; Amresh D Hanchate Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Joseph A Diaz; Mary B Roberts; Roberta E Goldman; Sherrie Weitzen; Charles B Eaton Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jessica Himmelstein; Christopher Cai; David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler; David H Bor; Samuel L Dickman; Danny McCormick Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Allison Squires; Roy Thompson; Tina Sadarangani; Polina Amburg; Kathy Sliwinski; Cedonnie Curtis; Bei Wu Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 2.238