Literature DB >> 31898135

Trends in Diabetes Management Among US Adults: 1999-2016.

Michael Fang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Updating national trends in diabetes management is important for identifying areas of progress and remaining gaps in diabetes care.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate trends in diabetes management.
DESIGN: Three nationally representative, serial cross-sectional surveys (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [n = 5800], National Health Interview Survey [n = 48,519], and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [n = 741,497]) were used to estimate trends in diabetes management from 1999 to 2016. PARTICIPANTS: Non-pregnant US adults (aged ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with diabetes. MAIN MEASURES: American Diabetes Association's general recommendations for glycemic and cardiovascular risk factor control, medication usage, physical activity, preventive practices, and dietary intake. KEY
RESULTS: From 1999 to 2016, the proportion of US adults with diabetes who attained glycemic control (HbA1c < 7.0%) followed a quadratic trend (49.6% in 1999-2004 to 58.6% in 2005-2010 to 55.8% in 2011-2016, P < 0.05 for trend). Control of blood pressure (< 140/90 mmHg) and lipids (LDL cholesterol < 100 mg/dl) increased by 6.6 and 18.7 percentage points, respectively (P < 0.05 for trends). The proportion that attained glycemic, blood pressure, and lipid control followed a quadratic trend (13.3% in 1999-2004 to 24.8% in 2005-2010 to 20.2% in 2011-2016, P < 0.05 for trend). Use of antidiabetic, antihypertensive, and statin medication among those who were eligible rose by 8.6, 5.0, and 24.0 percentage points, respectively (P < 0.05 for trends). Aerobic inactivity declined 7.1 percentage points, while adherence to aerobic activity (≥ 150 min/week) and resistance training (≥ 2 times/week) recommendations grew 3.4 and 3.2 percentage points, respectively (P < 0.05 for trends). Engagement in preventive practices (e.g., receipt of vaccinations) consistently increased for 6 out of 8 outcomes. However, the adherence to saturated fat (< 10% of total daily calories) and sodium (< 2300 mg/day) recommendations fell by 6.5 and 5.2 percentage points (P < 0.05 for trends).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite notable improvements, declines in glycemic control and adherence to dietary recommendations may be growing challenges in diabetes care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diabetes mellitus; risk factor control; social disparities

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31898135      PMCID: PMC7210372          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05587-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  37 in total

1.  Physician competencies for prescribing lifestyle medicine.

Authors:  Liana Lianov; Mark Johnson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Nutrition Counseling in Clinical Practice: How Clinicians Can Do Better.

Authors:  Scott Kahan; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Effects of intensive glucose control on microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Sophia Zoungas; Hisatomi Arima; Hertzel C Gerstein; Rury R Holman; Mark Woodward; Peter Reaven; Rodney A Hayward; Timothy Craven; Ruth L Coleman; John Chalmers
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 32.069

4.  Trends in the Prevalence of Diabetes Among U.S. Adults: 1999-2016.

Authors:  Michael Fang
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Barriers to following dietary recommendations in Type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S Vijan; N S Stuart; J T Fitzgerald; D L Ronis; R A Hayward; S Slater; T P Hofer
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.359

6.  Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Diet and physical activity in the self-management of type 2 diabetes: barriers and facilitators identified by patients and health professionals.

Authors:  Alison O Booth; Carole Lowis; Moira Dean; Steven J Hunter; Michelle C McKinley
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.458

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of different dietary approaches to the management of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Olubukola Ajala; Patrick English; Jonathan Pinkney
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Trends in Prescription Drug Use Among Adults in the United States From 1999-2012.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Kantor; Colin D Rehm; Jennifer S Haas; Andrew T Chan; Edward L Giovannucci
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Trends in nutrient intake among adults with diabetes in the United States: 1988-2004.

Authors:  Reena Oza-Frank; Yiling J Cheng; K M Venkat Narayan; Edward W Gregg
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2009-07
View more
  16 in total

1.  CRS Diabetes: An Effective Model for Improving Family Medicine Resident Knowledge, Competence, and Performance in Diabetes Care.

Authors:  Nora A Williams; Stephen A Brunton; Gregory A Scott
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2022-01

2.  Effects of Dietary App-Supported Tele-Counseling on Sodium Intake, Diet Quality, and Blood Pressure in Patients With Diabetes and Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Sarah J Schrauben; Apurva Inamdar; Christina Yule; Sara Kwiecien; Caitlin Krekel; Charlotte Collins; Cheryl Anderson; Lisa Bailey-Davis; Alex R Chang
Journal:  J Ren Nutr       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 3.655

3.  Diabetes care quality: do large medical groups perform better?

Authors:  Leif I Solberg; Caroline S Carlin; Kevin A Peterson; Milton Eder
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 3.247

4.  Factors Contributing to the Rising National Cost of Glucose-Lowering Medicines for Diabetes During 2005-2007 and 2015-2017.

Authors:  Xilin Zhou; Sundar S Shrestha; Hui Shao; Ping Zhang
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Clinical outcomes in patients with native valve infective endocarditis and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Temidayo Abe; Harry Onoriode Eyituoyo; Gabrielle De Allie; Titilope Olanipekun; Valery Sammah Effoe; Kikelomo Olaosebikan; Paul Mather
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-26

6.  Association of Greenness with Blood Pressure among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes across Rural to Urban Community Types in Pennsylvania, USA.

Authors:  Melissa N Poulsen; Brian S Schwartz; Cara Nordberg; Joseph DeWalle; Jonathan Pollak; Giuseppina Imperatore; Carla I Mercado; Karen R Siegel; Annemarie G Hirsch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Type 2 Diabetes and the Use of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Melanie A Jackson; Andrew Ahmann; Viral N Shah
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 8.  Review: Glucose-sensitive insulin.

Authors:  Thomas Hoeg-Jensen
Journal:  Mol Metab       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 7.422

Review 9.  Glucose biosensors in clinical practice: principles, limits and perspectives of currently used devices.

Authors:  Salvatore Andrea Pullano; Marta Greco; Maria Giovanna Bianco; Daniela Foti; Antonio Brunetti; Antonino S Fiorillo
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 11.600

10.  Changes in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes in Mexico City Between 1998-2004 and 2015-2019.

Authors:  Diego Aguilar-Ramirez; Jesus Alegre-Díaz; Louisa Gnatiuc; Raúl Ramirez-Reyes; Rachel Wade; Michael Hill; Rory Collins; Richard Peto; Jonathan R Emberson; William G Herrington; Pablo Kuri-Morales; Roberto Tapia-Conyer
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.