Kristen R Choi1,2, Altaf Saadi3,4, Sae Takada3,5, Molly C Easterlin3,6, Liza S Buchbinder3,5, David C Johnson3,5, Frederick J Zimmerman4. 1. National Clinician Scholars Program, Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. krchoi@ucla.edu. 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. krchoi@ucla.edu. 3. National Clinician Scholars Program, Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. 4. Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. 5. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development, Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Firearm-related violence is a leading cause of mortality in the United States (US). Prior research suggests that public policy plays a role in firearm mortality, but the role of healthcare resources (physicians, insurance coverage) within the US policy context has not yet been studied. OBJECTIVE: To examine how healthcare resources and social/firearm policy affect firearm-related suicide and homicide rates in the US. DESIGN: Longitudinal, ecological study. SETTING: US. PARTICIPANTS: US states from 2012 to 2016 (N = 242). MEASUREMENT: The outcome variables were age-adjusted, firearm-related suicide and homicide rates. Predictor variables were healthcare resources (physicians, Medicaid benefits generosity) and policy context (social policy, firearm policy) with covariates for sociodemographic factors. RESULTS: Healthcare provider variables did not have significant associations to firearm-related suicide or homicide. In fully saturated models, more worker protection laws, greater average population density, more alcohol regulation, and more firearm prohibition policies were associated with fewer firearm-related suicides. Higher generosity of Medicaid benefits was associated with fewer firearm-related homicides. Poverty rate was a predictor of both outcomes. LIMITATIONS: This state-level study cannot make individual-level inferences. Only proxy variables were available for measuring gun ownership and actual gun ownership rates may not have been ideally captured at the state level. CONCLUSIONS: At the state level, there are protective associations of certain social, healthcare, and firearm policies to firearm-related suicide and homicide rates. Healthcare resources play a role in population-level firearm outcomes but alone are not sufficient to decrease firearm-related homicide or suicide.
BACKGROUND: Firearm-related violence is a leading cause of mortality in the United States (US). Prior research suggests that public policy plays a role in firearm mortality, but the role of healthcare resources (physicians, insurance coverage) within the US policy context has not yet been studied. OBJECTIVE: To examine how healthcare resources and social/firearm policy affect firearm-related suicide and homicide rates in the US. DESIGN: Longitudinal, ecological study. SETTING: US. PARTICIPANTS: US states from 2012 to 2016 (N = 242). MEASUREMENT: The outcome variables were age-adjusted, firearm-related suicide and homicide rates. Predictor variables were healthcare resources (physicians, Medicaid benefits generosity) and policy context (social policy, firearm policy) with covariates for sociodemographic factors. RESULTS: Healthcare provider variables did not have significant associations to firearm-related suicide or homicide. In fully saturated models, more worker protection laws, greater average population density, more alcohol regulation, and more firearm prohibition policies were associated with fewer firearm-related suicides. Higher generosity of Medicaid benefits was associated with fewer firearm-related homicides. Poverty rate was a predictor of both outcomes. LIMITATIONS: This state-level study cannot make individual-level inferences. Only proxy variables were available for measuring gun ownership and actual gun ownership rates may not have been ideally captured at the state level. CONCLUSIONS: At the state level, there are protective associations of certain social, healthcare, and firearm policies to firearm-related suicide and homicide rates. Healthcare resources play a role in population-level firearm outcomes but alone are not sufficient to decrease firearm-related homicide or suicide.
Authors: Lois K Lee; Eric W Fleegler; Caitlin Farrell; Elorm Avakame; Saranya Srinivasan; David Hemenway; Michael C Monuteaux Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Michael Siegel; Yamrot Negussie; Sarah Vanture; Jane Pleskunas; Craig S Ross; Charles King Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Iman N Afif; Ariana N Gobaud; Christopher N Morrison; Sara F Jacoby; Zoë Maher; Elizabeth D Dauer; Elinore J Kaufman; Thomas A Santora; Jeffrey H Anderson; Abhijit Pathak; Lars Ola Sjoholm; Amy J Goldberg; Jessica H Beard Journal: Prev Med Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 4.637