Literature DB >> 31897884

Complication rate, cure rate, and long-term outcomes of microsurgery for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae: a multicenter series and systematic review.

Taku Sugiyama1, Naoki Nakayama2, Satoshi Ushikoshi3, Ken Kazumata2, Michinari Okamoto2, Masaki Ito4, Toshiya Osanai2, Yusuke Shimoda3, Kazuki Uchida5, Daisuke Shimbo5, Yasuhiro Ito6, Katsuyuki Asaoka5, Toshitaka Nakamura7, Satoshi Kuroda8, Kiyohiro Houkin9.   

Abstract

Although microsurgery is an established treatment modality for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF), data regarding the perioperative complication rate, cure rate, and long-term outcomes remain scarce. The aims of this study were to describe our original experience with microsurgery, including the surgical complications and pitfalls, and conduct a systematic review of the relevant literature. A multicenter cohort of patients with dAVF treated by microsurgery was retrospectively assessed. In addition, the PubMed database was searched for published studies involving microsurgery for dAVF, and the complication rate, cure rate, and long-term outcomes were estimated. The total number of patients in our multicenter series and published articles was 553 (593 surgeries). The overall rates of transient complications, permanent complications, death, and incomplete treatment were 11.4, 4.0, 1.2, and 6.5%, respectively. A favorable outcome was achieved for 90.1% patients, even though almost half of the patients presented with intracranial hemorrhage. Of note, the incidence of recurrence was only one per 8241 patient-months of postoperative follow-up. Surgeries for anterior cranial fossa dAVF were associated with a lower complication rate, whereas those for tentorial dAVF were associated with higher complication and incomplete treatment rates. The complication and incomplete treatment rates were lower with simple disconnection of cortical venous drainage than with radical occlusion/resection of dural shunts. Our findings suggest that the cure rate, complication rates, and outcomes of microsurgery for dAVF are acceptable; thus, it could be a feasible second-line treatment option for dAVF. However, surgeons should be aware of the specific adverse events of microsurgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse event; Craniotomy; Dural arteriovenous shunt; Surgical disconnection; Surgical interruption; Surgical obliteration

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31897884     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-019-01232-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  9 in total

Review 1.  Dural arteriovenous fistulas at the craniocervical junction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jingjing Zhao; Feng Xu; Jinma Ren; Sunil Manjila; Nicholas C Bambakidis
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.836

2.  A new classification of complications in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Federico Alfonso Landriel Ibañez; Santiago Hem; Pablo Ajler; Eduardo Vecchi; Carlos Ciraolo; Matteo Baccanelli; Ruben Tramontano; Fernando Knezevich; Antonio Carrizo
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Characteristics and long-term outcome of 251 patients with dural arteriovenous fistulas in a defined population.

Authors:  Anna Piippo; Mika Niemelä; Jouke van Popta; Marko Kangasniemi; Jaakko Rinne; Juha E Jääskeläinen; Juha Hernesniemi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  The natural history of cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulae.

Authors:  Bradley A Gross; Rose Du
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Surgical treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae: role of venous drainage.

Authors:  M Collice; G D'Aliberti; O Arena; C Solaini; R A Fontana; G Talamonti
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

7.  Tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulae: operative strategies and microsurgical results for six types.

Authors:  Michael T Lawton; Rene O Sanchez-Mejia; Diep Pham; Jeffrey Tan; Van V Halbach
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 8.  Endovascular and surgical approaches of ethmoidal dural fistulas: a multicenter experience and a literature review.

Authors:  D Cannizzaro; S Peschillo; M Cenzato; G Pero; M C Resta; G Guidetti; N Burdi; M Piccirilli; A Santoro; G Lanzino
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Dural arteriovenous fistulas with cortical venous drainage: incidence, clinical presentation, and treatment.

Authors:  W J van Rooij; M Sluzewski; G N Beute
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.825

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Anterior interhemispheric approach for anterior fossa dural arteriovenous fistulas.

Authors:  Etienne Lefevre; Stéphanie Lenck; Soledad Navarro; Stephane Clemenceau; Anne-Laure Boch; Sophie Dupont; Vincent Degos; Frédéric Clarençon; Michel Kalamarides; Alexandre Carpentier; Aurélien Nouet
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Clinical outcomes of procedures combining endovascular embolization with a direct surgical approach in a hybrid operating room for the treatment of refractory dural arteriovenous fistulas.

Authors:  Naoki Kato; Toshihiro Ishibashi; Fumiaki Maruyama; Katharina Otani; Shota Kakizaki; Gota Nagayama; Ayako Ikemura; Shunsuke Hataoka; Issei Kan; Tomonobu Kodama; Yuichi Murayama
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-08-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.