Literature DB >> 31897723

Forest and connectivity loss simplify tropical pollination networks.

Patrícia Alves Ferreira1, Danilo Boscolo2, Luciano Elsinor Lopes3, Luísa G Carvalheiro4,5, Jacobus C Biesmeijer5,6, Pedro Luís Bernardo da Rocha7, Blandina Felipe Viana7.   

Abstract

Mutualistic interactions between plants and pollinators play an essential role in the organization and persistence of biodiversity. The structure of interaction networks mediates the resilience of local communities and ecosystem functioning to environmental changes. Hence, network structure conservation may be more critical for maintaining biodiversity and ecological services than the preservation of isolated species in changing landscapes. Here, we intensively surveyed seven 36 km2 landscapes to empirically investigate the effects of forest loss and landscape configuration on the structure of plant-pollinator networks in understory vegetation of Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Our results indicate that forest loss and isolation affect the structure of the plant-pollinator networks, which were smaller in deforested landscapes, and less specialized as patch isolation increased. Lower nestedness and degree of specialization (H'2) indicated that the remaining plant and bee species tend to be generalists, and many of the expected specialized interactions in the network were already lost. Because generalist species generate a cohesive interaction core in these networks, these simplified networks might be resistant to loss of peripheral species, but may be susceptible to the extinction of the most generalist species. We suggest that such a network pattern is an outcome of landscapes with a few remaining isolated patches of natural habitat. Our results add a new perspective to studies of plant-pollinator networks in fragmented landscapes, showing that those interaction networks might also be used to indicate how changes in natural habitat affect biodiversity and biotic interactions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bees; Brazilian Atlantic Forest; Fragmented landscapes; Interaction networks; Mutualistic web

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31897723     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-019-04579-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  25 in total

1.  The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks.

Authors:  Jordi Bascompte; Pedro Jordano; Carlos J Melián; Jens M Olesen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Specialization and rarity predict nonrandom loss of interactions from mutualist networks.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Malena Sabatino; Jason M Tylianakis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Direct effects of habitat area on interaction diversity in pollination webs.

Authors:  Malena Sabatino; Néstor Maceira; Marcelo A Aizen
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size.

Authors:  Sarah S Greenleaf; Neal M Williams; Rachael Winfree; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits?

Authors:  Nico Blüthgen; Jochen Fründ; Diego P Vázquez; Florian Menzel
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and interactions: a quantitative approach incorporating pollinator behaviour.

Authors:  Christopher N Kaiser-Bunbury; Stefanie Muff; Jane Memmott; Christine B Müller; Amedeo Caflisch
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Pollinator Foraging Strategies in Mixed Floral Arrays: Density Effects and Floral Constancy

Authors: 
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.570

8.  Evolution of floral morphology and pollination system in Bignonieae (Bignoniaceae).

Authors:  Suzana Alcantara; Lúcia G Lohmann
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  The functional consequences of mutualistic network architecture.

Authors:  José M Gómez; Francisco Perfectti; Pedro Jordano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Tropical forest fragmentation affects floral visitors but not the structure of individual-based palm-pollinator networks.

Authors:  Wesley Dáttilo; Armando Aguirre; Mauricio Quesada; Rodolfo Dirzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.