| Literature DB >> 31897485 |
Jisha Antony1,2, Gregory Gimenez1, Terry Taylor3, Umaima Khatoon1, Robert Day4, Ian M Morison1, Julia A Horsfield1,2.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: CRISPR-Cas9; ERG; RUNX1; STAG2; chromatin; cohesin; enhancer; inducible; megakaryocyte
Year: 2020 PMID: 31897485 PMCID: PMC7288737 DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mjz114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Cell Biol ISSN: 1759-4685 Impact factor: 6.216
Figure 1STAG2 mutation alters chromatin accessibility and response to cell signaling. (A) Schematic of STAG2 protein showing the position of STAG2 R614* (C>T) mutation. Shown also is the Sanger sequencing plot for CRISPR-Cas9-edited K562 line containing homozygous STAG2 R614* mutation (STAG2-null). A silent mutation was introduced at PAM site in STAG2-null cells. (B) Immunoblot analyses of STAG2 protein levels in parental (WT) and STAG2-null cells. Bar graphs show STAG2 protein normalized to γ-tubulin from three biological replicates. Significance was determined by unpaired t-test. L, protein ladder. (C) Images of WT and STAG2-null K562 cells in culture. (D) Gene set enrichment analyses showing upregulation of extracellular matrix (Naba core matrisome) and haematopoietic stem cell genes in STAG2-null Shown are the normalized enrichment score (NES) and FDR q-value. (E) Volcano plot of differential chromatin accessibility in STAG2-null compared to WT K562 cells. Significant peaks at adjusted P-value ≤ 0.05 are shown in red (52452 sites showing differential accessibility, 29432 differentially increased and 23020 differentially decreased). Lines indicate log2 fold change cut-off: 2. (F) Enrichment of differentially increased and decreased accessible sites identified in STAG2-null at SEs (defined in K562, CD34+ cord blood cells, and CD14+ monocytes). (G) Integrative genome browser view of normalized ATAC-sequencing signals from STAG2-null and WT cells at ERG and RUNX1. Significant (P ≤ 0.05) accessible sites at RUNX1-P2 promoter and ERG +85 kb enhancer are boxed. ChromHMM data for K562 (derived from ENCODE) is shown at the top of each plot, and additional tracks are BRD4 binding in K562 following treatment with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or 6 h of JQ1 (Liu et al., 2017). (H and I) ERG (H) and RUNX1-P2 (I) expression levels examined over a time-course treatment with PMA, JQ1, or a combination of PMA and JQ1. Graphs depict average relative mRNA levels from three biological replicates normalized to two reference genes. Black asterisks denote significant difference between WT and STAG2-null lines following PMA-only treatment. Green asterisks denote significant difference between PMA-only and combination of PMA and JQ1 treatment within each cell type. Significance was determined by two-way Anova. (J) Relative mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of KIT and CD15 following treatment with control DMSO or JQ1 for 24 h. Relative MFI for each cell type and condition was determined as a ratio of MFI in stained/unstained. Graphs represent the average of three biological replicates. Significance was determined by two-way Anova. Black asterisks denote significant difference between WT and STAG2-null cells for the same condition. Red asterisks denote significant difference between DMSO and JQ1 treatment within each cell type. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.