Literature DB >> 31897219

A gene-expression-based test can outperform bap1 and p16 analyses in the differential diagnosis of pleural mesothelial proliferations.

Greta Alì1, Rossella Bruno1, Anello Marcello Poma2, Agnese Proietti1, Stefano Ricci2, Antonio Chella3, Franca Melfi4, Marcello Carlo Ambrogi5, Marco Lucchi5, Gabriella Fontanini6.   

Abstract

The demonstration of tissue invasion by histology is an essential criterion for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant mesothelial proliferations. When tissue invasion cannot be identified, the use of ancillary tests is sometimes necessary. Among investigated markers, the loss of BRCA1 associated protein 1 (BAP1) protein expression and the homozygous deletion of p16 have shown 100% specificity in separating benign and malignant mesothelial lesions. However, beyond the excellent specificity of these two markers, their low sensitivity limits their clinical utility. In this context, a previous study developed and tested a novel tool for use in the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) using the NanoString System and a classification algorithm. In the current study, the performance of gene classifiers were compared using BAP1 and p16 testing. p16 FISH and BAP1 immunohistochemistry were performed on the same series of 34 epithelioid MPM and 20 benign pleural lesions, which were previously analyzed by the system. The diagnostic performance of p16, BAP1 and our classification models were compared using ROC analysis. It was observed that BAP1 loss and p16 deletion were highly specific for MPM, since they were not detected in benign lesions. However, their AUC values were not completely satisfying (BAP1: 0.8235; p16: 0.7647) particularly due to their low sensitivities. As expected, combining BAP1 and p16 tests increased the diagnostic sensitivity, thus improving the AUC (0.8824). In the same series of cases, our MPM tool outperformed BAP1 and p16 tests using the 22 and 40-gene classification models (AUC 22-gene model: 0.9996; AUC 40-gene model: 0.9990). In conclusion, the present gene-expression-based classification exhibited great potential and further validation is required to support these findings in a prospective fashion, in order to provide a solid alternative for pleural proliferation diagnosis.
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1 associated protein 1 immunohistochemistry; malignant pleural mesothelioma; mesothelial hyperplasia; p16 fluorescent in situ hybridization

Year:  2019        PMID: 31897219      PMCID: PMC6924193          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.11174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  27 in total

Review 1.  NanoString, a novel digital color-coded barcode technology: current and future applications in molecular diagnostics.

Authors:  Hin-Fung Tsang; Vivian Weiwen Xue; Su-Pin Koh; Ya-Ming Chiu; Lawrence Po-Wah Ng; Sze-Chuen Cesar Wong
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 5.225

Review 2.  Implications of P16/CDKN2A deletion in pleural mesotheliomas.

Authors:  Marc Ladanyi
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 5.705

3.  SORORIN and PLK1 as potential therapeutic targets in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kato; Daiyoon Lee; Licun Wu; Priya Patel; Ahn Jin Young; Hironobu Wada; Hsin-Pei Hu; Hideki Ujiie; Mitsuhito Kaji; Satoshi Kano; Shinichi Matsuge; Hiromitsu Domen; Hiromi Kanno; Yutaka Hatanaka; Kanako C Hatanaka; Kichizo Kaga; Yoshiro Matsui; Yoshihiro Matsuno; Marc De Perrot; Kazuhiro Yasufuku
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 5.650

4.  BAP1 facilitates diagnostic objectivity, classification, and prognostication in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Stephanie M McGregor; Ryan Dunning; Elizabeth Hyjek; Wickii Vigneswaran; Aliya N Husain; Thomas Krausz
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  The use of CDKN2A deletion as a diagnostic marker for malignant mesothelioma in body cavity effusions.

Authors:  Peter B Illei; Marc Ladanyi; Valerie W Rusch; Maureen F Zakowski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Guidelines for Pathologic Diagnosis of Malignant Mesothelioma 2017 Update of the Consensus Statement From the International Mesothelioma Interest Group.

Authors:  Aliya Noor Husain; Thomas V Colby; Nelson G Ordóñez; Timothy Craig Allen; Richard Luther Attanoos; Mary Beth Beasley; Kelly Jo Butnor; Lucian R Chirieac; Andrew M Churg; Sanja Dacic; Françoise Galateau-Sallé; Allen Gibbs; Allen M Gown; Thomas Krausz; Leslie Anne Litzky; Alberto Marchevsky; Andrew G Nicholson; Victor Louis Roggli; Anupama K Sharma; William D Travis; Ann E Walts; Mark R Wick
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 5.534

7.  Guidelines of the European Respiratory Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  A Scherpereel; P Astoul; P Baas; T Berghmans; H Clayson; P de Vuyst; H Dienemann; F Galateau-Salle; C Hennequin; G Hillerdal; C Le Péchoux; L Mutti; J-C Pairon; R Stahel; P van Houtte; J van Meerbeeck; D Waller; W Weder
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 8.  The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Pleura: Advances since the 2004 Classification.

Authors:  Francoise Galateau-Salle; Andrew Churg; Victor Roggli; William D Travis
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  FISH assay development for the detection of p16/CDKN2A deletion in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Catherine T-S Chung; Gilda Da Cunha Santos; David M Hwang; Olga Ludkovski; Melania Pintilie; Jeremy A Squire; Ming-Sound Tsao
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  An RNAi-based screen reveals PLK1, CDK1 and NDC80 as potential therapeutic targets in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  A Linton; Y Y Cheng; K Griggs; Lyn Schedlich; M B Kirschner; S Gattani; S Srikaran; S Chuan-Hao Kao; B C McCaughan; S Klebe; N van Zandwijk; G Reid
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.