Literature DB >> 31896648

Metatranscriptomic Sequencing of a Cyanobacterial Soil-Surface Consortium with and without a Diverse Underlying Soil Microbiome.

Terrence H Bell1,2, Ryan V Trexler3, Xin Peng2,4, Marcel Huntemann5, Alicia Clum5, Brian Foster5, Bryce Foster5, Simon Roux5, Krishnaveni Palaniappan5, Neha Varghese5, Supratim Mukherjee5, T B K Reddy5, Chris Daum5, Alex Copeland5, Natalia N Ivanova5, Nikos C Kyrpides5, Christa Pennacchio5, Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh5, Mary Ann Bruns2,4.   

Abstract

Soil surface consortia are easily observed and sampled, allowing examination of their interactions with soil microbiomes. Here, we present metatranscriptomic sequences from Dark Green 1 (DG1), a cyanobacterium-based soil surface consortium, in the presence and absence of an underlying soil microbiome and/or urea.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31896648      PMCID: PMC6940300          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.01361-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Microbial inoculants can establish unpredictably in soils, due to factors including competition with established microorganisms (1); however, inoculants that form visible surface films provide unique opportunities to track survival. In 2013, cyanobacterium-based soil surface consortia from Pennsylvania were enriched to develop surface film-forming inoculants (2). One consortium, Dark Green 1 (DG1), was enriched in culture over 2 years without added nitrogen or carbon, and abundant members include Cylindrospermum spp. and six nonphotosynthetic taxa (3). We introduced DG1 to soils containing low- or high-diversity microbiomes, with or without urea added. Soil was collected from Penn State’s Agronomy Research Farm (4), sieved to 2 mm, and twice autoclaved (45 min, 24-h interval). To one portion, nonautoclaved soil was reintroduced at 5% (vol/vol) to establish a high-diversity microbiome. Inoculated and uninoculated soil was dispensed into 12 petri dishes each (10 by 15 mm; 25 g dry soil/dish). An even fructose/maltose/glucose/galactose/ribose mixture was added to microcosms at 2 g carbon/kg dry soil. Six microcosms from each soil type received urea at 150 (start of incubation) and 50 mg nitrogen/kg dry soil (pre-DG1 addition), generating four treatments. The microcosms were dark incubated for 43 weeks at 21°C. DG1 was grown in modified BG-11 medium under continuous fluorescent lighting (average 1,865 lux) and moderate agitation at 21°C (4). The cultures were pelleted at 5,500 rpm in 50-ml Falcon tubes, the medium was removed, and sterile deionized (DI) water was added (3:1 [vol/vol]) to resuspend the mixture. We pipetted 3-ml suspension across the surface of each soil sample and incubated the microcosms under constant fluorescent light for 5 weeks at 21°C. RNA was extracted from the excised biofilms using the RNeasy PowerSoil total RNA kit (Qiagen), assessed on an Agilent BioAnalyzer at the Penn State Genomics Core (RNA integrity no. [RIN], >7), and shipped to the Joint Genome Institute (JGI). Metatranscriptome library preparation was performed on a Sciclone NGS robot (PerkinElmer) using Illumina’s Ribo-Zero rRNA removal kits (equimolar bacteria/yeast/plant root) and the TruSeq stranded total RNA high-throughput (HT) kit, with 100 ng/sample RNA and 10 PCR cycles for library amplification. Libraries were quantified with KAPA library quantification kits on a Roche LightCycler 480. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina NovaSeq using XP v1 reagent kits following a 2 × 150-nucleotide (nt) indexed run recipe. Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise noted. BBDUK (v38.26) removed (i) contaminants, (ii) adapter sequences and right read segments where quality was equal to 0, (iii) reads with N bases, a mean quality score of <10, or minimum length of ≤51 bp or 33% of full length, and (iv) rRNA (5). The filtered reads were assembled using MEGAHIT v1.1.2 (–k list, 23, 43, 63, 83, 103, 123) (6). The filtered reads were mapped to contigs using BBMap (v38.25, ambiguous=random) to estimate coverage (5). Genes were identified and annotated in IMG/M v4 (7, 8). Taxonomic assignments for transcripts were determined by selecting the options “compare genomes” and “phylogenetic distribution” at a percent identity of ⩾60% and normalized by estimated gene copies. Table 1 presents the annotation statistics for the metatranscriptomes.
TABLE 1

Summary of sample information and metatranscriptome annotation statistics

Microcosm conditionReplicate no.Read countTotal bases (Mbp)N50 (bp)Contig countTotal gene countGC content (%)No. of CDSa genesCDS genes (%)Genes with predicted protein product (%)Genes assigned to enzymes (%)IMG taxon no.
High diversity plus urea1219,723,36896.847,412169,357215,73360.503212,09998.3265.2321.513300031481
2231,138,23048.219,28179,20998,70355.35595,64896.964.7421.13300031495
3225,572,28221.25,78529,05539,26057.06437,55995.6763.5919.473300031499
4195,630,98816.24,63522,23929,75856.12228,28795.0663.5119.323300031502
5199,215,54818.34,97925,84233,51754.72531,75294.7364.2618.543300031503
6208,163,37617.78,06429,99437,21359.16735,17894.5364.721.333300031504
High diversity1186,588,01023.313,14943,86751,45458.6949,06595.3660.3519.613300031484
2197,781,21422.88,20135,74645,00655.91743,03295.6162.9919.183300031487
3247,118,63213.34,93521,23625,86653.51323,99192.7562.4618.63300031491
4232,297,57223.47,46135,59345,66455.47643,66695.6264.1919.323300031490
5177,035,36458.625,71797,967124,26760.664121,38597.6867.623.293300031493
6185,064,55637.715,32061,97578,18358.32475,87197.0466.421.893300031476
Low diversity plus urea1290,517,45416.53,48119,78729,35053.73728,86298.3470.1624.13300031488
2187,827,8065.21,4256,6569,25748.7039,08398.1267.9124.253300031483
3227,368,6605.71,3686,8879,57049.2149,39998.2170.2423.123300031475
4207,822,51410.91,76610,91217,26751.58717,00798.4970.4224.023300031494
5225,974,35625.23,57824,95741,64558.97641,12798.7670.5725.813300031492
6199,479,2467.81,1847,12011,58148.02511,37098.1868.7922.293300031479
Low diversity1213,606,58212.61,04810,67018,25150.18818,02898.7869.5623.573300031498
2222,910,45813.783111,11719,56050.39319,24498.3868.8422.893300031489
3243,278,23219.82,15519,35330,79454.18730,42498.868.1423.873300031477
4205,533,538109578,59414,31247.5714,08098.3868.0421.683300031482
5196,564,51211.11,22110,28416,35748.78216,09598.468.8922.53300031497
6228,387,13412.11,84112,24219,16151.53118,89198.5969.2524.083300031480

CDS, coding DNA sequence.

Summary of sample information and metatranscriptome annotation statistics CDS, coding DNA sequence. Initial analysis suggests fewer cyanobacterium transcripts when high-diversity microbiomes are present, particularly with urea. Of interest will be the frequency of transcripts indicating interspecific interactions.

Data availability.

Metatranscriptome sequences are available through the JGI Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) under project identifier Gs0132857.
  4 in total

1.  MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph.

Authors:  Dinghua Li; Chi-Man Liu; Ruibang Luo; Kunihiko Sadakane; Tak-Wah Lam
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  The Inherent Conflicts in Developing Soil Microbial Inoculants.

Authors:  Laura M Kaminsky; Ryan V Trexler; Rondy J Malik; Kevin L Hockett; Terrence H Bell
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2018-12-23       Impact factor: 19.536

3.  The standard operating procedure of the DOE-JGI Microbial Genome Annotation Pipeline (MGAP v.4).

Authors:  Marcel Huntemann; Natalia N Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; H James Tripp; David Paez-Espino; Krishnaveni Palaniappan; Ernest Szeto; Manoj Pillay; I-Min A Chen; Amrita Pati; Torben Nielsen; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2015-10-26

4.  IMG/M v.5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes.

Authors:  I-Min A Chen; Ken Chu; Krishna Palaniappan; Manoj Pillay; Anna Ratner; Jinghua Huang; Marcel Huntemann; Neha Varghese; James R White; Rekha Seshadri; Tatyana Smirnova; Edward Kirton; Sean P Jungbluth; Tanja Woyke; Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh; Natalia N Ivanova; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Best Practices for Successfully Writing and Publishing a Genome Announcement in Microbiology Resource Announcements.

Authors:  Julie C Dunning Hotopp; David A Baltrus; Vincent M Bruno; John J Dennehy; Steven R Gill; Julia A Maresca; Jelle Matthijnssens; Irene L G Newton; Catherine Putonti; David A Rasko; Antonis Rokas; Simon Roux; Jason E Stajich; Kenneth M Stedman; Frank J Stewart; J Cameron Thrash
Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc       Date:  2020-09-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.