Literature DB >> 3189654

A biomechanical analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the patellar tendon. A two year followup.

J E Tibone1, T J Antich.   

Abstract

Eleven patients, 2 years after ACL reconstruction with a patellar tendon graft, returned for follow-up testing consisting of: 1) subjective assessment and functional analysis, 2) objective examination for residual ligamentous instability, 3) isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings strength assessment, 4) radiographic assessment, 5) instrumented measurement of anterior shear displacement via a knee arthrometer, and 6) force plate and film analysis while performing cutting maneuvers in a laboratory setting. All 11 patients had been tested preoperatively through all steps except the fifth. The group subjectively rated the postoperative knee as 83% of the preinjury status, an increase from a 53% mean prior to reconstruction. Six of 11 patients were able to return to their full preinjury level of competition, with or without a brace. Four patients had positive drawer tests, five had positive Lachman examinations, and all subjects had negative pivot shifts. Significant quadriceps torque deficits remained (P less than 0.0005), with the postoperative knee extensors approximately 85% of the contralateral limb. The involved limb hamstrings were equal in strength to the nonoperated limb. Radiographic evaluation revealed four, five, and four patients with positive findings of the patellofemoral joint, medial joint space, and lateral joint space, respectively. Only one patient had normal radiographs. Instrumented knee laxity testing revealed the operated knee to be significantly looser only during maximum passive displacement (7.2 mm versus 5.3 mm, P less than 0.01) and not during the other measurements. Biomechanical analysis of the straight cut maneuver revealed no significant differences between the nonoperated and operated limbs at the 2 year postoperative mark.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3189654     DOI: 10.1177/036354658801600404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  8 in total

1.  A biomechanical comparison between the central one-third patellar tendon and the residual tendon.

Authors:  M J Matava; W C Hutton
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Evolving strategies in mechanobiology to more effectively treat damaged musculoskeletal tissues.

Authors:  David L Butler; Nathaniel A Dyment; Jason T Shearn; Kirsten R C Kinneberg; Andrew P Breidenbach; Andrea L Lalley; Steven D Gilday; Cynthia Gooch; M B Rao; Chia-feng Liu; Christopher Wylie
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Good muscle performance does not compensate instability symptoms in chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  A Harilainen; H Alaranta; J Sandelin; I Vanhanen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Healing of the patellar tendon after harvesting of its mid-third for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and evolution of the unclosed donor site defect.

Authors:  E Adriani; P P Mariani; G Maresca; N Santori
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Rehabilitation concerns following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  P A Frndak; C C Berasi
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  A modified repair for the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee.

Authors:  J P Holland
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Anterior cruciate ligament patellar tendon reconstruction: it is probably better to leave the tendon defect open!

Authors:  G Cerullo; G Puddu; E Gianní; A Damiani; F Pigozzi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Change of Direction Assessment Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Current Practice and Considerations to Enhance Practical Application.

Authors:  Joao Beleboni Marques; Darren James Paul; Phil Graham-Smith; Paul James Read
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 11.136

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.