Literature DB >> 31895753

Phase Ib/II trial testing combined radiofrequency ablation and ipilimumab in uveal melanoma (SECIRA-UM).

Elisa A Rozeman1, Warner Prevoo2, Mark A J Meier2, Karolina Sikorska3, Trieu M Van4, Bart A van de Wiel5, Jacqueline E van der Wal5, Henk A Mallo1, Lindsay G Grijpink-Ongering3, Annegien Broeks6, Ferry Lalezari2, Jason Reeves7, Sarah Warren7, Johannes V van Thienen1, Harm van Tinteren3, John B A G Haanen1, Ellen Kapiteijn8, Christian U Blank1.   

Abstract

Approximately, 50% of patients with uveal melanoma develop distant metastasis for which no standard therapy is established. In contrast to cutaneous melanoma, the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab showed no clinical activity in uveal melanoma. Liver directed therapies improve local control, but fail to show overall survival (OS) benefit. Preclinical experiments demonstrated that radiofrequency ablation (RFA) induced durable responses in combination with anti-CTLA-4. The aim of this phase Ib/II study was to assess safety and efficacy of RFA plus ipilimumab in uveal melanoma. Patients underwent RFA of one liver lesion and subsequently received four courses ipilimumab 0.3, 3 or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks in a 3 + 3 design. Primary endpoints were safety in terms of dose limiting toxicities per cohort to define the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in the phase Ib part and confirmed the objective response rate and disease control rate (DCR) of non-RFA lesions in the phase II part. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg + RFA was initially defined as the RP2D. However, after 19 patients, the study was amended to adjust the RP2D to ipilimumab 3 mg/kg + RFA, because 47% of patients treated with 10 mg/kg had developed grade 3 colitis. In the 3 mg/kg cohort, also 19 patients have been treated. Immunotherapy-related grade ≥3 adverse events were observed in 53% of patients in the 10 mg/kg cohort versus 32% in the 3 mg/kg cohort. No confirmed objective responses were observed; the confirmed DCR was 5% in the 10 mg/kg cohort and 11% in the 3 mg/kg cohort. Median PFS was 3 months and comparable for both cohorts, median OS was 14.2 months for the 10 mg/kg cohort versus 9.7 months for the 3 mg/kg cohort. Combining RFA with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg was well tolerated, but showed very limited clinical activity in uveal melanoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31895753     DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.599


  8 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances and Challenges in Uveal Melanoma Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yihang Fu; Wei Xiao; Yuxiang Mao
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  The Role of Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Uveal Melanoma.

Authors:  Anja Wessely; Theresa Steeb; Michael Erdmann; Lucie Heinzerling; Julio Vera; Max Schlaak; Carola Berking; Markus Vincent Heppt
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Comprehensive analysis of cutaneous and uveal melanoma liver metastases.

Authors:  Esmee P Hoefsmit; Elisa A Rozeman; Trieu My Van; Petros Dimitriadis; Oscar Krijgsman; Jordan W Conway; Ines Pires da Silva; Jacqueline E van der Wal; Steven L C Ketelaars; Kaspar Bresser; Annegien Broeks; Ron M Kerkhoven; Jason W Reeves; Sarah Warren; Pia Kvistborg; Richard A Scolyer; Ellen W Kapiteijn; Daniel S Peeper; Georgina V Long; Ton N M Schumacher; Christian U Blank
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 13.751

4.  Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Blockades in the Treatment of Ocular Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lu Zhao; Wenwen Xia; Yan Zhang; Peng Zou; Qiwen Zhu; Rong Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  A Necroptosis-Related Prognostic Model of Uveal Melanoma Was Constructed by Single-Cell Sequencing Analysis and Weighted Co-Expression Network Analysis Based on Public Databases.

Authors:  Jiaheng Xie; Liang Chen; Qikai Tang; Wei Wei; Yuan Cao; Chuyan Wu; Jing Hang; Kai Zhang; Jingping Shi; Ming Wang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Combining Hepatic Percutaneous Perfusion with Ipilimumab plus Nivolumab in advanced uveal melanoma (CHOPIN): study protocol for a phase Ib/randomized phase II trial.

Authors:  T M L Tong; M K van der Kooij; F M Speetjens; A R van Erkel; R W van der Meer; J Lutjeboer; E L van Persijn van Meerten; C H Martini; R W M Zoethout; F G J Tijl; C U Blank; M C Burgmans; E Kapiteijn
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  In situ immunogenic clearance induced by a combination of photodynamic therapy and rho-kinase inhibition sensitizes immune checkpoint blockade response to elicit systemic antitumor immunity against intraocular melanoma and its metastasis.

Authors:  Seohyun Kim; Seong A Kim; Gi-Hoon Nam; Yeonsun Hong; Gi Beom Kim; Yoonjeong Choi; Seokyoung Lee; Yuri Cho; Minsu Kwon; Cherlhyun Jeong; Sehoon Kim; In-San Kim
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 13.751

8.  Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan in Patients with Unresectable Ocular Melanoma Metastases Confined to the Liver: A Prospective Phase II Study.

Authors:  T Susanna Meijer; Mark C Burgmans; Eleonora M de Leede; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Bas Boekestijn; Henricus J M Handgraaf; Denise E Hilling; Jacob Lutjeboer; Jaap Vuijk; Christian H Martini; Arian R van Erkel; Rutger W van der Meer; Fred G J Tijl; Frank M Speetjens; Ellen Kapiteijn; Alexander L Vahrmeijer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 5.344

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.