Rodrigo Feteira-Santos1, João Fernandes1, Ana Virgolino1, Violeta Alarcão1,2, Catarina Sena3, Carlota P Vieira3, Maria João Gregório4,5, Paulo Nogueira1,3,6, Andreia Costa1,3,7, Pedro Graça4,5, Osvaldo Santos1. 1. Instituto de Saúde Ambiental, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa. 2. Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia (CIES-IUL), Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL). 3. Direção-Geral da Saúde. 4. Programa Nacional para a Promoção da Alimentação Saudável, Direção-Geral da Saúde, Lisboa. 5. Faculdade de Ciências da Nutrição e Alimentação da Universidade do Porto, Porto. 6. Laboratório de Biomatemática, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa. 7. Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Abstract
AIMS: Interpretive front-of-package nutrition labelling can contribute to healthier food habits. This systematic review aimed to examine the effectiveness of interpretive front-of-package nutrition labelling schemes on consumers' food choices, namely at the moment of food purchase, and to analyse if this potential front-of-package nutrition labelling's effect varies according to different socioeconomic groups. METHODS: Electronic databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) search was performed to identify peer-reviewed articles describing longitudinal studies evaluating the effect of front-of-package nutrition labelling schemes on consumers' food choices, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-Equity 2012 Extension guidelines. No publication-period or language restrictions were applied. PROGRESS-Plus framework was used to report if and how socioeconomic factors were considered in analyses of front-of-package nutrition labelling-related interventions' effect. RESULTS: Nine studies were selected for narrative synthesis (seven randomized controlled trials and two cross-over trials). When compared with no-interpretive-label conditions, front-of-package nutrition labelling showed a positive impact for nutritional content understanding, healthiness perception of products, selection of products with better nutritional quality, and purchase intention. However, there is no robust evidence of superiority of a specific front-of-package nutrition labelling scheme's effect, neither on consumers' understanding of nutritional content nor on food choices. An evaluation of the studies following the PROGRESS-Plus framework revealed that socioecononomic status and education were the most frequently used dimensions, when assessing the effect of interpretative front-of-pack nutrition labels. More evidence is necessary to determine the role of front-of-pack nutrition labels in decreasing inequalities between different population subgroups, namely among the most vulnerable subgroups, on the promotion of healthy food choices. CONCLUSION: Well controlled longitudinal studies, following a real-world evidence approach, are needed to clarify front-of-package nutrition labelling's impact on consumers' food choices, namely at purchase points, taking into account the most vulnerable population subgroups, such as those with lower literacy and/or financial resources.
AIMS: Interpretive front-of-package nutrition labelling can contribute to healthier food habits. This systematic review aimed to examine the effectiveness of interpretive front-of-package nutrition labelling schemes on consumers' food choices, namely at the moment of food purchase, and to analyse if this potential front-of-package nutrition labelling's effect varies according to different socioeconomic groups. METHODS: Electronic databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) search was performed to identify peer-reviewed articles describing longitudinal studies evaluating the effect of front-of-package nutrition labelling schemes on consumers' food choices, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-Equity 2012 Extension guidelines. No publication-period or language restrictions were applied. PROGRESS-Plus framework was used to report if and how socioeconomic factors were considered in analyses of front-of-package nutrition labelling-related interventions' effect. RESULTS: Nine studies were selected for narrative synthesis (seven randomized controlled trials and two cross-over trials). When compared with no-interpretive-label conditions, front-of-package nutrition labelling showed a positive impact for nutritional content understanding, healthiness perception of products, selection of products with better nutritional quality, and purchase intention. However, there is no robust evidence of superiority of a specific front-of-package nutrition labelling scheme's effect, neither on consumers' understanding of nutritional content nor on food choices. An evaluation of the studies following the PROGRESS-Plus framework revealed that socioecononomic status and education were the most frequently used dimensions, when assessing the effect of interpretative front-of-pack nutrition labels. More evidence is necessary to determine the role of front-of-pack nutrition labels in decreasing inequalities between different population subgroups, namely among the most vulnerable subgroups, on the promotion of healthy food choices. CONCLUSION: Well controlled longitudinal studies, following a real-world evidence approach, are needed to clarify front-of-package nutrition labelling's impact on consumers' food choices, namely at purchase points, taking into account the most vulnerable population subgroups, such as those with lower literacy and/or financial resources.
Authors: Jasmin Bhawra; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Marissa G Hall; Lana Vanderlee; James F Thrasher; David Hammond Journal: J Nutr Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 4.687
Authors: Rodrigo Feteira-Santos; Violeta Alarcão; Osvaldo Santos; Ana Virgolino; João Fernandes; Carlota Pacheco Vieira; Maria João Gregório; Paulo Nogueira; Andreia Costa; Pedro Graça Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Andrés Constantin; Oscar A Cabrera; Belén Ríos; Isabel Barbosa; Ariadna Tovar Ramírez; Margherita M Cinà; Silvia Serrano Guzmán Journal: Global Health Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 4.185