Literature DB >> 31895286

Effect of Different Recoveries During HIIT Sessions on Metabolic and Cardiorespiratory Responses and Sprint Performance in Healthy Men.

Moisés D Germano1,2, Márcio A G Sindorf1, Alex H Crisp1, Tiago V Braz1, Felipe A Brigatto1, Ana G Nunes2, Rozângela Verlengia1, Marlene A Moreno1, Marcelo S Aoki3, Charles R Lopes1,4.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Germano, MD, Sindorf, MAG, Crisp, AH, Braz, TV, Brigatto, FA, Nunes, AG, Verlengia, R, Moreno, MA, Aoki, MS, and Lopes, CR. Effect of different recoveries during HIIT sessions on metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses and sprint performance in healthy men. J Strength Cond Res 36(1): 121-129, 2022-The purpose of this study was to investigate how the type (passive and active) and duration (short and long) recovery between maximum sprints affect blood lactate concentration, O2 consumed, the time spent at high percentages of V̇o2max, and performance. Subjects were randomly assigned to 4 experimental sessions of high-intensity interval training exercise. Each session was performed with a type and duration of the recovery (short passive recovery-2 minutes, long passive recovery [LPR-8 minutes], short active recovery-2 minutes, and long active recovery [LAR-8 minutes]). There were no significant differences in blood lactate concentration between any of the recoveries during the exercise period (p > 0.05). The LAR presented a significantly lower blood lactate value during the postexercise period compared with LPR (p < 0.01). The LPR showed a higher O2 volume consumed in detriment to the active protocols (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in time spent at all percentages of V̇o2max between any of the recovery protocols (p > 0.05). The passive recoveries showed a significantly higher effort time compared with the active recoveries (p < 0.001). Different recovery does not affect blood lactate concentration during exercise. All the recoveries permitted reaching and time spent at high percentages of V̇o2max. Therefore, all the recoveries may be efficient to generate disturbances in the cardiorespiratory system.
Copyright © 2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 31895286     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based recommendations for resistance and power training to prevent frailty in community-dwellers.

Authors:  Hélio José Coelho-Júnior; Marco Carlos Uchida; Anna Picca; Roberto Bernabei; Francesco Landi; Riccardo Calvani; Matteo Cesari; Emanuele Marzetti
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Excess Post-Exercise Oxygen Consumption and Substrate Oxidation Following High-Intensity Interval Training: Effects of Recovery Manipulation.

Authors:  Márcio A G Sindorf; Moisés D Germano; Wellington G Dias; Danilo R Batista; Tiago V Braz; Marlene A Moreno; Charles R Lopes
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-10-01

3.  Psychophysiological Responses of Exercise Distribution During High Intensity Interval Training Using Whole Body Exercise.

Authors:  Alexandre F Machado; Paulo Vinicios Camuzi Zovico; Alexandre L Evangelista; Roberta L Rica; João Marcelo de Q Miranda; Cristine Lima Alberton; Valentina Bullo; Stefano Gobbo; Marco Bergamin; Julien S Baker; Danilo S Bocalini
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.755

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.