Heather Morris1, Sumit Mohan. 1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Bedside estimates of renal function are essential for clinical practice in the modern era and have largely relied on serum creatinine concentrations despite the known drawbacks associated with this choice of biomarker, including the fact that creatinine clearance overestimates the glomerular filtration rate. RECENT FINDINGS: Initial estimates relied primarily on equations that incorporated factors known to influence creatinine concentrations such as age, sex and anthropometric measures. More recent estimates of glomerular filtration rate have replaced the anthropometric measures with the social construct of race, suggesting that glomerular filtration rates for black individuals are higher at the same concentration of creatinine. This approach has led to large variations in the estimated differences in glomerular filtration rate between black and nonblack individuals in the United States that have not been reproducible, resulting in a plethora of population-specific formulae across the country. SUMMARY: The introduction of race in estimated glomerular filtration rate equations may have potential unintended negative consequences for the very population with the greatest burden of kidney disease. These potential disadvantages underscore the need to perhaps return to the replacement of race with more objective anthropometric measures without the loss of precision.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Bedside estimates of renal function are essential for clinical practice in the modern era and have largely relied on serum creatinine concentrations despite the known drawbacks associated with this choice of biomarker, including the fact that creatinine clearance overestimates the glomerular filtration rate. RECENT FINDINGS: Initial estimates relied primarily on equations that incorporated factors known to influence creatinine concentrations such as age, sex and anthropometric measures. More recent estimates of glomerular filtration rate have replaced the anthropometric measures with the social construct of race, suggesting that glomerular filtration rates for black individuals are higher at the same concentration of creatinine. This approach has led to large variations in the estimated differences in glomerular filtration rate between black and nonblack individuals in the United States that have not been reproducible, resulting in a plethora of population-specific formulae across the country. SUMMARY: The introduction of race in estimated glomerular filtration rate equations may have potential unintended negative consequences for the very population with the greatest burden of kidney disease. These potential disadvantages underscore the need to perhaps return to the replacement of race with more objective anthropometric measures without the loss of precision.
Authors: R D Toto; K A Kirk; J Coresh; C Jones; L Appel; J Wright; V Campese; B Olutade; L Agodoa Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: J Lewis; L Agodoa; D Cheek; T Greene; J Middleton; D O'Connor; A Ojo; R Phillips; M Sika; J Wright Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Jesse D Schold; Sankar D Navaneethan; Stacey E Jolly; Emilio D Poggio; Susana Arrigain; Welf Saupe; Anil Jain; John W Sharp; James F Simon; Martin J Schreiber; Joseph V Nally Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-11-29 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Orlando M Gutiérrez; Cheryl Anderson; Tamara Isakova; Julia Scialla; Lavinia Negrea; Amanda Hyre Anderson; Keith Bellovich; Jing Chen; Nancy Robinson; Akinlolu Ojo; James Lash; Harold I Feldman; Myles Wolf Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Carmen A Peralta; Anne Lee; Michelle C Odden; Lenny Lopez; Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri; John Neuhaus; Mary N Haan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: John B Eastwood; Sally M Kerry; Jacob Plange-Rhule; Frank B Micah; Sampson Antwi; Frances G Boa; Debasish Banerjee; Lynsey Emmett; Michelle A Miller; Francesco P Cappuccio Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2010-01-25 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Ebele M Umeukeje; Taneya Y Koonce; Sheila V Kusnoor; Ifeoma I Ulasi; Sophia Kostelanetz; Annette M Williams; Mallory N Blasingame; Marcia I Epelbaum; Dario A Giuse; Annie N Apple; Karampreet Kaur; Tavia González Peña; Danika Barry; Leo G Eisenstein; Cameron T Nutt; Nunzia B Giuse Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-10-18 Impact factor: 3.752