Maile Y Karris1, Karine Dubé2, Alison A Moore1. 1. Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California. 2. University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health Leadership Program, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Partnerships between academia and the community led to historic advances in HIV and paved the way for ongoing community engagement in research. Three decades later, we review the state of community engagement in HIV research, discuss best practices as supported by literature, explore innovations, and identify ongoing gaps in knowledge. RECENT FINDINGS: The community of people living with and at risk for HIV remains actively involved in the performance of HIV research. However, the extent of participation is highly variable despite long standing and established principles and guidelines of good participatory practices (GPP) and community-based participatory research (CBPR). Current literature reveals that known barriers to successful community engagement continue to exist such as power differences, and poor scientific or cultural competency literacy. Several high-quality studies share their experiences overcoming these barriers and demonstrate the potential of CBPR through reporting of qualitative and quantitative outcomes. SUMMARY: Greater time and attention should be placed on the development of community engagement in HIV research. A large body of literature, including innovative cross-cutting approaches, exists to guide and inform best practices and mitigate common barriers. However, we recognize that true growth and expansion of CBPR within HIV and in other fields will require a greater breadth of research reporting qualitative and quantitative outcomes.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Partnerships between academia and the community led to historic advances in HIV and paved the way for ongoing community engagement in research. Three decades later, we review the state of community engagement in HIV research, discuss best practices as supported by literature, explore innovations, and identify ongoing gaps in knowledge. RECENT FINDINGS: The community of people living with and at risk for HIV remains actively involved in the performance of HIV research. However, the extent of participation is highly variable despite long standing and established principles and guidelines of good participatory practices (GPP) and community-based participatory research (CBPR). Current literature reveals that known barriers to successful community engagement continue to exist such as power differences, and poor scientific or cultural competency literacy. Several high-quality studies share their experiences overcoming these barriers and demonstrate the potential of CBPR through reporting of qualitative and quantitative outcomes. SUMMARY: Greater time and attention should be placed on the development of community engagement in HIV research. A large body of literature, including innovative cross-cutting approaches, exists to guide and inform best practices and mitigate common barriers. However, we recognize that true growth and expansion of CBPR within HIV and in other fields will require a greater breadth of research reporting qualitative and quantitative outcomes.
Authors: Patricia K Riggs; Antoine Chaillon; Guochun Jiang; Scott L Letendre; Yuyang Tang; Jeff Taylor; Andrew Kaytes; Davey M Smith; Karine Dubé; Sara Gianella Journal: Curr HIV/AIDS Rep Date: 2022-10-19 Impact factor: 5.495
Authors: Ilja Ormel; Jon Salsberg; Matthew Hunt; Alison Doucet; Lisa Hinton; Ann C Macaulay; Susan Law Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2020-12-31 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: Marta Schaaf; Anuj Kapilashrami; Asha George; Avni Amin; Soo Downe; Victoria Boydell; Goleen Samari; Ana Lorena Ruano; Priya Nanda; Rajat Khosla Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2021-04
Authors: Karine Dubé; John Kanazawa; Jeff Taylor; Lynda Dee; Nora Jones; Christopher Roebuck; Laurie Sylla; Michael Louella; Jan Kosmyna; David Kelly; Orbit Clanton; David Palm; Danielle M Campbell; Morénike Giwa Onaiwu; Hursch Patel; Samuel Ndukwe; Laney Henley; Mallory O Johnson; Parya Saberi; Brandon Brown; John A Sauceda; Jeremy Sugarman Journal: BMC Med Ethics Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 2.834
Authors: Elizabeth Barr; Karine Dubé; Shobha Swaminathan; Carlos Del Rio; Danielle M Campbell; Marta Paez-Quinde; Susan E Cohn Journal: HIV Res Clin Pract Date: 2021-06-18