Eman Salah Albeltagy1, Abeer Mohammed Abdul-Mohymen2, Doaa Refaat Amin Taha3. 1. Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine (For Girls), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. drbeleman@yahoo.com. 2. Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine (For Girls), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. 3. Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Medicine (For Girls), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In critically ill patients, acute kidney injury (AKI) is a devastating problem often associated with adverse outcomes. Depending on the conventional markers for diagnosis of AKI, an undesirable delay in the diagnosis and initiation of treatment has occurred. Thus, it is challenging to find a biomarker for early diagnosis of AKI. We sought to evaluate urinary YKL-40 as a biomarker for early diagnosis of AKI among critically ill patients compared with conventional markers and to assess its relation to the severity of AKI. METHODS: Thirty-six patients without AKI at the time of ICU admission who enrolled in this prospective cohort study had the following measured: serum creatinine as well as urine YKL-40 at admission and thereafter at 4 time intervals (0, 12, and 24 ± 48 h) (therefore, we studied 94 urine samples in 36 patients). Urine YKL-40 was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). AKI was defined using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria, which include three stages (1, 2, and 3) of progressive renal dysfunction. RESULTS: In this study, 18 (50%) patients developed AKI within 48-72 h. Moreover, urine YKL-40 increased significantly within 12 h in patients who developed AKI (n = 18, 11.75 ± 1.94), but not in non-AKI patients (n = 18, 5.66 ± 3.42) ng/ml (P < 0.001) and, at the same time, we did not find any significant difference in the serum creatinine levels between the two groups. In addition, AKI group showed rising levels with KIDGO classes. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study we found that urinary YKL-40 can be used as a valuable and noninvasive marker for early diagnosis of AKI among critically ill patients in ICU as compared to conventional markers and its level is increasing with the severity of AKI classes. However, the small sample size is important limitation. Therefore, large multicenter studies may be needed to confirm it.
PURPOSE: In critically ill patients, acute kidney injury (AKI) is a devastating problem often associated with adverse outcomes. Depending on the conventional markers for diagnosis of AKI, an undesirable delay in the diagnosis and initiation of treatment has occurred. Thus, it is challenging to find a biomarker for early diagnosis of AKI. We sought to evaluate urinary YKL-40 as a biomarker for early diagnosis of AKI among critically ill patients compared with conventional markers and to assess its relation to the severity of AKI. METHODS: Thirty-six patients without AKI at the time of ICU admission who enrolled in this prospective cohort study had the following measured: serum creatinine as well as urine YKL-40 at admission and thereafter at 4 time intervals (0, 12, and 24 ± 48 h) (therefore, we studied 94 urine samples in 36 patients). Urine YKL-40 was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). AKI was defined using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria, which include three stages (1, 2, and 3) of progressive renal dysfunction. RESULTS: In this study, 18 (50%) patients developed AKI within 48-72 h. Moreover, urine YKL-40 increased significantly within 12 h in patients who developed AKI (n = 18, 11.75 ± 1.94), but not in non-AKIpatients (n = 18, 5.66 ± 3.42) ng/ml (P < 0.001) and, at the same time, we did not find any significant difference in the serum creatinine levels between the two groups. In addition, AKI group showed rising levels with KIDGO classes. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study we found that urinary YKL-40 can be used as a valuable and noninvasive marker for early diagnosis of AKI among critically ill patients in ICU as compared to conventional markers and its level is increasing with the severity of AKI classes. However, the small sample size is important limitation. Therefore, large multicenter studies may be needed to confirm it.
Authors: Mitchell M Levy; Mitchell P Fink; John C Marshall; Edward Abraham; Derek Angus; Deborah Cook; Jonathan Cohen; Steven M Opal; Jean-Louis Vincent; Graham Ramsay Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Chun Geun Lee; Carla A Da Silva; Charles S Dela Cruz; Farida Ahangari; Bing Ma; Min-Jong Kang; Chuan-Hua He; Seyedtaghi Takyar; Jack A Elias Journal: Annu Rev Physiol Date: 2011 Impact factor: 19.318
Authors: Insa M Schmidt; Isaac E Hall; Sujata Kale; Sik Lee; Chuan-Hua He; Yashang Lee; Geoffrey L Chupp; Gilbert W Moeckel; Chun Geun Lee; Jack A Elias; Chirag R Parikh; Lloyd G Cantley Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-01-04 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Jorien De Loor; Johan Decruyenaere; Kristel Demeyere; Lieve Nuytinck; Eric A J Hoste; Evelyne Meyer Journal: Crit Care Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Eric A Hoste; Suvi T Vaara; Jorien De Loor; Mikko Haapio; Lieve Nuytinck; Kristel Demeyere; Ville Pettilä; Evelyne Meyer Journal: Crit Care Date: 2020-04-10 Impact factor: 9.097