| Literature DB >> 31894198 |
Collins Erinmwingbovo1, Dominique Koster1, Doriano Brogioli1, Fabio La Mantia1.
Abstract
Dynamic multi-frequency analysis (DMFA) is capable of acquiring high-quality frequency response of electrochemical systems under non-stationary conditions in a broad range of frequencies. In this work, we usedEntities:
Keywords: NiHCF thin films; dynamic impedance spectroscopy; dynamic multi-frequency analysis (DMFA); intercalation mechanism; multi-sine excitation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31894198 PMCID: PMC6919401 DOI: 10.1002/celc.201900805
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ChemElectroChem ISSN: 2196-0216 Impact factor: 4.590
Figure 1Cyclic voltammogram obtained during the electrodeposition of NiHCF in a freshly prepared solution of 2 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 2 mM NiSO4 and 0.5 M K2SO4 using a scan rate of 25 mV s−1.
Figure 2(a) SEM image of the GCE electrode surface covered with NiHCF (b) EDX pattern of the GCE electrode surface covered with NiHCF.
Figure 3Cyclic voltammogram obtained from the quasi triangular wave applied to the NiHCF thin films in 0.5 M A2SO4 solution (A=K, Na) using a scan rate of 200 mV s−1.
Figure 4Nyquist plot of impedance spectra obtained in the cathodic scan of NiHCF thin film within the frequency range of 10 Hz to 125 kHz in (a) 0.5 M Na2SO4 solution at 0.38 V (b) High‐frequency region of the impedance spectra obtained at different potentials during the cathodic scan in 0.5 M Na2SO4 (c) 0.5 M K2SO4 solution at 0.51 V (d) High‐frequency region of the impedance spectra obtained at different potentials during the cathodic scan in 0.5 M K2SO4.
Figure 5Nyquist plot of the high‐frequency region of the impedance spectra obtained at different potentials during the anodic scan in 0.5 M (a) Na2SO4 and (b) K2SO4.
Figure 6(a) Equivalent circuit obtained from the modelling the reversible insertion of cations in aqueous electrolyte as a two‐step process (b) Equivalent circuit used for fitting the measured impedance data obtained from statistical analysis of the equivalent circuit from the model.
Figure 7Variation of the resistance of adsorption (R) on the electrode potential.
Figure 8Dependence of the Warburg coefficient in the electrolyte (σ) on the electrode potential.
Figure 9Variation of the Warburg coefficient in the solid (σ) on the electrode potential.