| Literature DB >> 31894172 |
R C Allen1, C P Paranicas1, F Bagenal2, S K Vines1, D C Hamilton3, F Allegrini4,5, G Clark1, P A Delamere6, T K Kim5,4, S M Krimigis1, D G Mitchell1, T H Smith1, R J Wilson2.
Abstract
On 10 January 2001, Cassini briefly entered into the magnetosphere of Jupiter, en route to Saturn. During this excursion into the Jovian magnetosphere, the Cassini Magnetosphere Imaging Instrument/Charge-Energy-Mass Spectrometer detected oxygen and sulfur ions. While Charge-Energy-Mass Spectrometer can distinguish between oxygen and sulfur charge states directly, only 95.9 ± 2.9 keV/e ions were sampled during this interval, allowing for a long time integration of the tenuous outer magnetospheric (~200 RJ) plasma at one energy. For this brief interval for the 95.9 keV/e ions, 96% of oxygen ions were O+, with the other 4% as O2+, while 25% of the energetic sulfur ions were S+, 42% S2+, and 33% S3+. The S2+/O+ flux ratio was observed to be 0.35 (±0.06 Poisson error). ©2019. The Authors.Entities:
Keywords: Cassini; Composition; Juno; Jupiter
Year: 2019 PMID: 31894172 PMCID: PMC6919296 DOI: 10.1029/2019GL085185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Geophys Res Lett ISSN: 0094-8276 Impact factor: 4.720
Figure 1During the 10 January 2001 magnetospheric excursion, a solar wind pressure increase was passing over the magnetosphere of Jupiter but had yet to reach Cassini (see Kurth et al., 2002). The yellow line denotes an estimated magnetopause, while the red segment denotes the time Cassini was within the Jovian magnetosphere. Solid (dashed) black curves show modeled magnetopause (bow shock) boundaries using the Joy et al. (2002) models. The gray box shows the approximate region of the solar wind pressure enhancement moving through the system at the time Cassini was within the magnetosphere. Adapted from Kurth et al. (2002).
Figure 2Pulse height analysis counts for (A) the magnetospheric excursion and (B) the magnetosheath after exiting the magnetosphere on 10 January 2001. The green vertical bar shows the mass‐per‐charge range of O+ and S2+ populations used in Figure 3 (mass per charge = [15,17] amu/e), while the blue and purple horizontal bars show the mass ranges used in Figure 4 for sulfur (m = [25,50] amu) and oxygen (m = [10,20] amu), respectfully. Horizontal dashed lines denote mass 16 (oxygen) and 32 amu (sulfur).
Figure 3Histogram of counts in the mass‐per‐charge range of 15–17 amu/e with Poisson error. The purple (blue) dashed curves show the weighted Gaussian fit of the histogram for O+ (S2+). The black dashed curve shows the sum of the two fits.
Figure 4Histograms of counts binned by mass‐per‐charge for the mass range of (A) 25–50 amu and (B) 10–20 amu corresponding to sulfur and oxygen, respectively. Panels C and D illustrate the percentage of flux in each charge state for sulfur (oxygen). Panel E shows the relative flux abundance of 95.9 keV/e oxygen and sulfur from this study (green) and from Kim et al. (2019) (pink). Previously published relative densities are shown in Panel F. Error bars are included for surveys of multiple events to denote the maximum and minimum of the relative abundance within that study.