| Literature DB >> 31893317 |
R Chen1, S Tang2, Q Lu1, X Zhang1, W Zhang1, Z Chen1, S Qi1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: As laparoscopic techniques and equipments improve, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has been gaining popularity. The objective of the study was to summarize 9 years of experience using a single-port micro-laparoscopic approach to repair pediatric inguinal hernias with a simple hernia needle.Entities:
Keywords: Children; Inguinal hernia; Micro-laparoscopic; Single-port
Year: 2019 PMID: 31893317 PMCID: PMC7210235 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-02079-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hernia ISSN: 1248-9204 Impact factor: 4.739
Fig.1The equipment, materials and procedure of the surgery. a The equipment and materials. b The hernia needle with a non-absorbable silk suture. c The specialist was operating. d The needle inserted into abdominal cavity. e The needle with suture-1 withdrawn and left suture loop. f The needle with suture-2 inserted into suture-1 loop. g The suture-2 was brought out to encircle the internal ring. h The internal ring after high ligation. i After surgery, the incision was hardly seen
Fig. 2Schematic diagram of high ligation. a Internal ring. b The laparoscope was inserted into the suture-1 loop. c The needle with suture-2 inserted into the suture-1 loop. d the laparoscope was inserted into the suture-2 loop. e The suture-2 was brought out by suture-1
Patients’ characteristics (n = 1880)
| Parameters | Observations |
|---|---|
| No. of cases | 1880 |
| Mean age | 3.66 ± 2.96 years (2 months to 14 years) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 1622 (86%) |
| Female | 258 (14%) |
| Side of hernia | |
| Right | 740 (39%) |
| Left | 559 (30%) |
| Bilateral | 581 (31%) |
| Contralateral occult | 77 (4%) |
| Mean operative time | 12.5 ± 3.5 min (unilateral) |
| 20.5 ± 4.5 min (bilateral) | |
| Follow-up | 3 ~ 65 months |
| Hospital stay | 3.76 ± 1.05 days |
| Complications | |
| Knot reaction | 5 (0.27%) |
| Pneumoscrotum | 54 (2.87%) |
| Recurrence | 13 (0.69%) |