There is a rapidly increasing interest in organic thin film thermoelectrics. However, the power factor of one molecule thick organic film, the self-assembled monolayer (SAM), has not yet been determined. This study describes the experimental determination of the power factor in SAMs and its length dependence at an atomic level. As a proof-of-concept, SAMs composed of n-alkanethiolates and oligophenylenethiolates of different lengths are focused. These SAMs were electrically and thermoelectrically characterized on an identical junction platform using a liquid metal top-electrode, allowing the straightforward estimation of the power factor of the monolayers. The results show that the power factor of the alkyl SAMs ranged from 2.0 × 10-8 to 8.0 × 10-12 μW m-1 K-2 and exhibited significant negative length dependence, whereas the conductivity and thermopower of the conjugated SAMs are the two opposing factors that balance the power factor upon an increase in molecular length, exhibiting a maximum power factor of 3.6 × 10-8 μW m-1 K-2. Once correction factors about the ratio of effective contact area to geometrical contact area are considered, the values of power factors can be increased by several orders of magnitude. With a newly derived parametric semiempirical model describing the length dependence of the power factor, it is investigated that one molecule thick films thinner than 10 nm composed of thiophene units can yield power factors rivaling those of famed organic thermoelectric materials based on poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT/PSS) and polyaniline/graphene/double-walled carbon nanotube. Furthermore, how the transition of the transport regime from tunneling to hopping as molecules become long affects power factors is examined.
There is a rapidly increasing interest in organic thin film thermoelectrics. However, the power factor of one molecule thick organic film, the self-assembled monolayer (SAM), has not yet been determined. This study describes the experimental determination of the power factor in SAMs and its length dependence at an atomic level. As a proof-of-concept, SAMs composed of n-alkanethiolates and oligophenylenethiolates of different lengths are focused. These SAMs were electrically and thermoelectrically characterized on an identical junction platform using a liquid metal top-electrode, allowing the straightforward estimation of the power factor of the monolayers. The results show that the power factor of the alkyl SAMs ranged from 2.0 × 10-8 to 8.0 × 10-12 μW m-1 K-2 and exhibited significant negative length dependence, whereas the conductivity and thermopower of the conjugated SAMs are the two opposing factors that balance the power factor upon an increase in molecular length, exhibiting a maximum power factor of 3.6 × 10-8 μW m-1 K-2. Once correction factors about the ratio of effective contact area to geometrical contact area are considered, the values of power factors can be increased by several orders of magnitude. With a newly derived parametric semiempirical model describing the length dependence of the power factor, it is investigated that one molecule thick films thinner than 10 nm composed of thiophene units can yield power factors rivaling those of famed organic thermoelectric materials based on poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT/PSS) and polyaniline/graphene/double-walled carbon nanotube. Furthermore, how the transition of the transport regime from tunneling to hopping as molecules become long affects power factors is examined.
The study of organic thin film thermoelectrics
is important from
both a fundamental and practical point of view. In terms of the fundamental
aspect, it helps to unravel the mechanism of charge transport across
an ensemble of molecules.[1−8] In terms of the practical aspect, it holds the promise of developing
flexible, lightweight, solution-processable, and low-cost thermoelectric
generators or Peltier devices under moderate temperature gradients.[9−14] Recently, significant efforts have been devoted to enhance the power
factor (PF)—a measure of how much electricity a material can
generate at once at a given temperature—of organic thin films.
PF is defined as κ × S2 where
κ (S/cm) is the electrical conductivity and S (μV/K) is the Seebeck coefficient. As examples, the PF of
DMSO-mixed poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT/PSS)
has been reported as 469 μW m–1 K–2,[15] and an organic thin film composed
of polyaniline (PANI), graphene, and double-walled carbon nanotube
(DWCN) has been shown to have a PF of 1825 μW m–1 K–2,[16] rivaling the
values of conventional thermoelectric inorganic semiconductors. Despite
the recent advances in the field of organic thin film thermoelectrics,
it is still unclear how atomic-detail structural modifications in
active organic components affect the PF of the thermoelectric devices
in many cases. This is primarily because of uncertainties that arise
from the complicated (supra)molecular structures of active components
and organic–electrode interfaces.Self-assembled monolayers
(SAMs) are one molecule thick two-dimensional
(2D) organic nanomaterials[17] and have been
used for a number of applications, yet their PF never has been experimentally
determined.[1−3,5,7,8,13] Here
we measure the PF of SAMs and examine the length dependence of PF
at the atomic level. SAMs were formed on the template-stripped gold
(AuTS),[18] and these were incorporated
into large-area junctions using the conical tips of eutectic gallium–indium
covered with conductive native oxide (denoted as Ga2O3/EGaIn; Figure a),[8,19] and the length dependences of the tunneling
conductivity, Seebeck coefficient, and PF were investigated. As a
proof-of-concept, structurally simple molecules of oligophenylenethiolates
(S(Ph); n = 1, 2, 3), n-alkanethiolates (SC; m = 4, 8, 12), and cyclohexanethiolates (S(Cy); k = 1, 2) were focused (Figure b). We revealed that
both the conductivity and thermopower of the alkyl SAMs decreased
with the increasing molecular length, thereby leading to a significant
decrease in PF from 2.0 × 10–8 to 8.0 ×
10–12 μW m–1 K–2. On the other hand, the conductivity of the conjugated SAMs was
found to decrease with the increasing length, whereas the thermopower
increased. This trade-off led to a nonlinear length dependence of
the PF ranging from 2.6 × 10–8 to 3.6 ×
10–8 μW m–1 K–2. Once the ratio of effective contact area to geometrical contact
area was considered, the values of PF could be increased by several
orders of magnitude. We further derived a parametric semiempirical
model that describes the length dependence of PF in monolayers. Simulation
of PF using this model suggests that one molecule thick organic films
(< ∼ 10 nm)—with taking the form of SAMs—composed
of thiophene units that exhibit a negative tunneling decay coefficient
(i.e., an increase in conductivity with increasing the length) can
yield PFs rivaling those of renowned organic thermoelectric materials
based on PEDOT/PSS and PANI/graphene/DWCN. Further study allows access
to how the transition of transport regime from tunneling to hopping
as molecules become long affect power factors. Our study demonstrates
that the SAM-based junctions not only can be a useful nanoscale platform
to draw inferences on atomic-detail structure-power factor relations
but also have the potential as a ultrathin organic thermoelectric
generator over low-grade heat.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic describing the structure
of the large-area tunneling
and thermoelectric junction we used. (b) Molecules we used in this
study and the numbering of non-hydrogen atoms from sulfur to the most
distal atom to define the length of the molecule.
(a) Schematic describing the structure
of the large-area tunneling
and thermoelectric junction we used. (b) Molecules we used in this
study and the numbering of non-hydrogen atoms from sulfur to the most
distal atom to define the length of the molecule.
Results and Discussion
The length dependences of tunneling
current density (J, A/cm2) and thermopower
(S, μV/K)
in SAM-based junctions can be described using the following models.
The simplified Simmons model[20−22] in eq is widely used to explain the length dependence
of J:where β (Å–1,
per carbon (nC–1), or phenylene (nPh–1)) is the conductance decay constant, J0 (A/cm2) is the charge injection current density, and d (Å or the number of carbon (m in
SC) or phenylene (n in
S(Ph)) is the width of the tunneling
barrier usually taken from the molecular length. Likewise, the length
dependence of thermopower can be described using eq :[3,8,23]where SSAM is
the thermopower of SAM, S0 (μV/K)
is the thermopower corresponding to the molecule–electrode
interfaces, and βS (μV·(K·Å)−1, μV·(K·nC)−1, or μV·(K–1·nPh)−1) is the rate of change
of S as the value of d varies.Figure b shows
the molecules we used to form SAMs. These molecules were chosen for
the following reasons. (i) Fabrication procedures of S(Ph) and SC SAMs, their
on-surface (supra)molecular and electronic structures, and the electrical
characteristics have been established.[4,24−27] (ii) The thermopower of S(Ph) SAMs
has been widely examined in separate junction platforms, and thus,
they could be used as standard molecules in thermopower measurements.[3,4,8] (iii) The tunneling conductance
and Seebeck coefficient of these SAMs can be measured on the identical
junction platform, an EGaIn-based large-area junction. (iv) Comparison
of S(Ph) SAMs with the analogous SC and S(Cy) SAMs
with the same anchoring group and a similar thickness (defined as
the total number of non-hydrogen atoms from the sulfur to the most
distal atom as shown in Figure b) makes it possible to determine the effect that the conjugation
in the backbone of the SAM has on the PF. (v) The addition of phenylene
units into the benzenethiolate leads to an increase in the vertical
conjugation length of the backbone, which leads to an increase and
decrease in the Seebeck coefficient and the electrical conductance,
respectively.[3,4,8,24] Therefore, this structural design allows
an investigation into how such a trade-off between the conductance
and thermopower affects the PF.The SAMs were synthesized, and
large-area molecular junctions were
constructed following the previously reported procedures in the literature
(see the Supporting Information for details;
in our experiments, no unexpected or unusually high safety hazards
were encountered).[4,8,22,28] The SAMs were characterized with X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS) and confirmed the formation of monolayers by analyzing
the S 2p high resolution spectra[29,30] (see the Supporting Information for details). In a typical
experiment, a sufficient amount of J–V traces in the voltage range of 0–0.5 V was collected,
and then histograms of log|J| were plotted, from
which the mean (log|J|mean) and standard
deviation (σlog|) values were
extracted. Figures S1–S8 in the
Supporting Information summarize the log|J|−V traces and log|J| histograms. The length
dependence of log|J| is shown in Figure a. For S(Ph), the values of β and J0 were
0.26 ± 0.01 Å–1 and 102.5±0.1 A/cm2, respectively, and those for SC were 0.76 ± 0.03 Å–1 and 103.8±0.2 A/cm2. These values were consistent
with the literature values (see Figure S9 in the Supporting Information).[24,25] For the shortest
molecules of each series (SPh1, S(Cy)1, and
SC4), values of log|J| were indistinguishable
(see Figure a), and
this observation was consistent with the literature result.[26] For S(Cy), the
values of β and J0 were 0.57 ±
0.00 Å–1 and 102.9±0.0 A/cm2, respectively. The β of S(Cy) was slightly lower than that of SC. This difference in β is perhaps due to the difference in
conformational order and/or the difference in hyperconjugation between
S(Cy) and SC. According to previous studies,[31,32] the hyperconjugation
between Au–S and the hydrocarbon backbone of molecules depends
on the conformational order of molecules in SAMs and can affect the
electrical properties. Further study is needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Note that while we could synthesize S(Cy)2 SAM following
the method reported in the literature,[33] the synthesis of pure HS(Cy)3 was difficult. To obtain
the tunneling conductivity (κ, S/cm), the following equation
was used: κ = J /E where E is the electric field (V/m).[34] This equation is valid when the J–E relationship is linear (i.e., in the Ohmic regime). Hence,
the J value in the low bias regime (|J| at +0.1 V; Figure b) was used to determine the value of E. The value
of E was also determined (i) by assuming that the
distance between two electrodes in junctions is equal to the length
of the fully extended molecule (d, Å) used to
form the SAM for the sake of simplicity and (ii) by calculating the
vertical distance (d·cos θ) between the
electrodes considering the cant angle (θ) of the molecules as
shown in Figure S14 in the Supporting Information.
The observed trends of E, κ, and PF values
determined using the two different methods were similar (see Tables S2 and S3 in the Supporting Information).
For the following discussion, the results determined by the first
method are used.
Figure 2
Plots of (a) log|J(+0.5 V)|, (b) log|J(+0.1 V)|, (c) conductivity (κ, μS/cm), (d)
Seebeck coefficient
(S, μV/K), and (e) power factor (PF, μW
m–1 K–2) as a function of the
molecular length (d, Å). Insets in panels c
and e show the κ and PF values of SC and S(Cy) in semi-log10 scale, respectively.
(f) Comparisons of κ, S, and PF for the short
molecules of similar thickness (SC4, S(Cy)1,
and S(Ph)1).
Plots of (a) log|J(+0.5 V)|, (b) log|J(+0.1 V)|, (c) conductivity (κ, μS/cm), (d)
Seebeck coefficient
(S, μV/K), and (e) power factor (PF, μW
m–1 K–2) as a function of the
molecular length (d, Å). Insets in panels c
and e show the κ and PF values of SC and S(Cy) in semi-log10 scale, respectively.
(f) Comparisons of κ, S, and PF for the short
molecules of similar thickness (SC4, S(Cy)1,
and S(Ph)1).Values of SSAM were
estimated following
a previously reported procedure.[4,8] Briefly, thermovoltage
(ΔV, μV) histograms were measured at
the temperature gradients of ΔT = 4, 8, and
12 K, respectively, and the mean (ΔVmean) and standard deviation (σΔ) of ΔV were extracted from the histograms
via single Gaussian fitting curves. Figures S10–S12 in the Supporting Information summarize the ΔV histograms at different ΔT. According to
the definition of S = −ΔV/ΔT, the slope in the plot of ΔV as a function of ΔT was used to
determine the Seebeck coefficient of junctions (Sjunction), which was converted to SSAM following a previously reported procedure (see the Supporting Information for details).Table summarizes
the result of our junction measurements. We observed that, as the
length of molecule increased, κ decreased for both S(Ph) and SC (Figure c). However, S decreased and increased with an increase in length for
SC and S(Ph), respectively (Figure d). Note that a recent study[35] has revealed
that the decrease rate of S as the molecular length
increases is different for short and long n-alkanethiolates,
which accounts for the nonlinear S trend of SC observed in Figure d. Because of the apparent decrease in both
the κ and S values, the PF of the SC SAMs exhibited substantially negative length dependence
(the inset in Figure e). By contrast, the κ and S values decreased
and increased, respectively, upon the change in the molecular length
for S(Ph), making them opposing factors
that balance out the PF and, interestingly, lead to nonlinear length
dependence of the PF (Figure e). Thus, the variation in the molecular length for S(Ph) (and not for SC) could be a strategy by which to optimize the PF. Indeed, while
the PFs of S(Ph) SAMs ranged from 2.6
× 10–8 to 3.6 × 10–8 μW m–1 K–2, the maximum
value was observed for S(Ph) with n = 2. The trends of κ, S, and PF
for S(Cy)k were nearly identical to SC. Among the short molecules with similar lengths, SC4, S(Ph)1 and S(Cy)1, S(Ph)1 exhibited
a PF ≈ 1.4 times higher than the PFs of the other molecules
(Table and Figure f). The reason for
this is mainly due to the difference in S rather
than κ. Whereas the enhancement in the PF as a result of the
conjugation in the backbone was not huge in the shortest molecules
tested, the effect of conjugation had a huge impact on the long molecules.
For example, the PF of the S(Ph)3 was approximately 3 orders
of magnitude (∼3250 times) higher than that of the SC12.
Table 1
Summary of Tunneling Conductivity
(κ), Seebeck Coefficient (S), and Power Factor
(PF) of the SAMs Composed of the Molecules Shown in Figure a
molecule
κ (μS/cm)
S (μV/K)
PF (μW m–1 K–2)
corrected PFa
SC4
4.8
6.4
2.0 × 10–8
2.0 × 10–5 – 2.0 × 10–2
SC8
4.7 × 10–1
3.5
5.7 × 10–10
5.7 × 10–7 – 5.7 × 10–4
SC12
8.9 × 10–3
3.0
8.0 × 10–12
8.0 × 10–9 – 8.0 × 10–6
S(Ph)1
4.5
7.8
2.7 × 10–8
2.7 × 10–5 – 2.7 × 10–2
S(Ph)2
3.7
9.8
3.6 × 10–8
3.6 × 10–5 – 3.6 × 10–2
S(Ph)3
1.6
12.9
2.6 × 10–8
2.6 × 10–5 – 2.6 × 10–2
S(Cy)1
3.7
7.3
2.0 × 10–8
2.0 × 10–5 – 2.0 × 10–2
S(Cy)2
4.2 × 10–1
4.3
7.7 × 10–10
7.7 × 10–7 – 7.7 × 10–4
The range of PF values after considering
the ratio of effective contact area to geometrical contact area (∼10–3 to ∼10–6, reported by previous
separate studies.[25,36,37]
Figure 3
Simulation of PF trends using eq for S(Ph) SAMs. (a) Trends
of PF as a function of molecular length and βS. (b)
Trends of PF as a function of molecular length and β. Inflection
points correspond to peak values of PF (PFpeak). The numbers
in circles correspond to the experimental values. Star symbols are
the experimental data points. (c–e) Plots of PF against molecular
length for the three different cases: (c) β is lowered at 45
Å (gray-white boundary) due to the transition of transport regime
from tunneling to hopping, whereas βS remains constant;
(d) βS is lowered, whereas β remains constant
after the transition; (e) both β and βS are
lowered. The insets show the changes in β and βS for each case. Noncorrected PF values are used for simulations.
The range of PF values after considering
the ratio of effective contact area to geometrical contact area (∼10–3 to ∼10–6, reported by previous
separate studies.[25,36,37]Simulation of PF trends using eq for S(Ph) SAMs. (a) Trends
of PF as a function of molecular length and βS. (b)
Trends of PF as a function of molecular length and β. Inflection
points correspond to peak values of PF (PFpeak). The numbers
in circles correspond to the experimental values. Star symbols are
the experimental data points. (c–e) Plots of PF against molecular
length for the three different cases: (c) β is lowered at 45
Å (gray-white boundary) due to the transition of transport regime
from tunneling to hopping, whereas βS remains constant;
(d) βS is lowered, whereas β remains constant
after the transition; (e) both β and βS are
lowered. The insets show the changes in β and βS for each case. Noncorrected PF values are used for simulations.The surface of EGaIn tip is rough, and thus the
effective contact
area that participates indeed in charge tunneling largely differs
from the geometrical contact area, as determined by optical microscopy.
Separate studies[25,36,37] estimated the ratio of the effective contact area to the geometrical
contact area to be ∼10–3 to ∼10–6 in EGaIn-based junctions. Taking these values into
account, corrected PFs were obtained; for example, the corrected PFs
for S(Ph)3 were found to be in the range of 2.6 ×
10–5 – 2.6 × 10–2 μW
m–1 K–2 (Table ).The use of the same junction testbed
for tunneling and thermopower
measurements allowed the combination of the length dependence models
of J and S (eqs and 2). Consequently,
a parametric semiempirical formula was derived to address the length
dependence of the PF in one molecule thick organic films:For the series of molecules based on the same
top- and bottom-interfaces, J0 and S0 became constant at the EGaIn junction. This
enabled the simulation of the correlations between the PF and molecular
length (Å or the number of methylene or phenylene units), β,
and βS using eq . For simulation, we focused on conjugated molecules, S(Ph). As shown in Figure a,b, the experimental and simulated data
were consistent for S(Ph) validating eq and confirming that PF
increases as β and βS decrease and increase,
respectively. The simulations confirm that the length dependence of
PF is nonlinear, as evidenced by the Gaussian shape of PF trends and
the presence of inflection points (peak values of PF; PFpeak) in Figure a,b,
and that the PF can be optimized by varying the molecular length in
conjugated SAMs.When molecules composing SAMs become long,
the charge transport
regime can be transitioned from tunneling to hopping.[38−41]Table S11 in the Supporting Information
summarizes previous studies that examined the molecular length at
which such a transition occurs. The transition can affect the values
of β and/or βS; hopping usually leads to the
reduction in the magnitude of |β| and |βS|.[39,40,42−44] Therefore,
in addition to the simulation based on pure tunneling in Figure a,b, we considered
two further cases where the transition affects (i) either β
and/or βS, and (ii) both of them. According to the
literature survey (Table S11 and S12 in
the Supporting Information), the averaged molecular length where hopping
dominates the transport was ∼45 Å, and the values of β
and/or βS were reduced by a factor of ∼9.6
when the transition occurred.[39−48] On the basis of this information, we considered the effect of hopping
in long molecules on PF for simulation. The change in β had
a significant effect on PF (Figure c,e), whereas the change in βS did
not result in a large difference in PF compared to pure tunneling
(Figure d). This finding
indicates the more pronounced contribution of β to PF than that
of βS in oligophenylenes. Note that the degree of
structural disorder may be significantly increased as the length of
molecule increases.[49] Our model does not
account for such an increase in the degree of structural disorder,
if any.Using eq , we further
examined the PF of one molecule thick organic films that have the
conjugated or nonconjugated backbones: phenylene (1, 2(24)), n-alkane
(3, 4),[35] thiophene
(5–6,[50]7,[51]9[52]), and diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP; 8)[53] in Figure a. β for these molecules has been experimentally
determined in the literature, and we used these values for simulating
PF values. While β for various types of molecules has been reported
in the literature, few studies have reported βS values.
Note that these values were mostly determined in the tunneling regime.
For the molecules 2, 8, and 9, we assumed that the βS of 2 is the
same as 1, and the βS of 8 and 9 are the same as 6. This assumption
is plausible considering the structural similarity in the repeating
units (Figure a).
For the sake of simplicity, we also assumed that J0 and SC for the molecules 2–9 are the same as those for molecules 1; that is, the PF is measured in the same junction platform,
allowing direct comparison of PF values between the molecules. Because
there is a difference in βS between short and long n-alkanethiolates,[35] short (3) and long (4) n-alkanethiolates
were separately considered.
Figure 4
(a) Molecules we tested (1) in
this study and reported
in the previous studies (2–9) in
which the values of β and/or βS have been reported.
(b) Plot of β against βS for the molecules
shown in (a). The open circle indicates the molecules whose βS is not reported in the literature. We assumed the βS of 2 is the same as 1, and the
βS values of 8 and 9 are
the same as 6. This assumption is plausible given similarity
in the structure of repeating units. (c) Peak values of PF (PFpeak) of molecules estimated with eq in the main text. The inset shows an exemplary
plot describing the Gaussian curve relationship between PF and molecular
length for the molecules 1. (d) The trend of PF as a
function of molecular length for molecules 9. Dotted
lines indicate the literature values corresponding to highly efficient
organic thermoelectric materials (PEDOT/PSS and PANI/graphene/DWCN
where DWCN is double-walled carbon nanotube). The inset shows the
same PF graph in semi-log10 scale. The value of n indicates the number of thiophene units in compound 9. (e–f) Plots of PF against molecular length for the two different
cases: (e) both β and βS are lowered with the
same sign (see the inset). (f) β is lowered with inversion of
the sign, and βS is lowered with same sign. Noncorrected
PF values are used.
(a) Molecules we tested (1) in
this study and reported
in the previous studies (2–9) in
which the values of β and/or βS have been reported.
(b) Plot of β against βS for the molecules
shown in (a). The open circle indicates the molecules whose βS is not reported in the literature. We assumed the βS of 2 is the same as 1, and the
βS values of 8 and 9 are
the same as 6. This assumption is plausible given similarity
in the structure of repeating units. (c) Peak values of PF (PFpeak) of molecules estimated with eq in the main text. The inset shows an exemplary
plot describing the Gaussian curve relationship between PF and molecular
length for the molecules 1. (d) The trend of PF as a
function of molecular length for molecules 9. Dotted
lines indicate the literature values corresponding to highly efficient
organic thermoelectric materials (PEDOT/PSS and PANI/graphene/DWCN
where DWCN is double-walled carbon nanotube). The inset shows the
same PF graph in semi-log10 scale. The value of n indicates the number of thiophene units in compound 9. (e–f) Plots of PF against molecular length for the two different
cases: (e) both β and βS are lowered with the
same sign (see the inset). (f) β is lowered with inversion of
the sign, and βS is lowered with same sign. Noncorrected
PF values are used.In our comparison, the magnitude and sign of β
played a critical
role in determining the size of PF. Figure b presents the plot of β and βS for the molecules shown in Figure a. Equation indicates that more positive βS and
more negative β lead to higher PF (Figure b). The molecules with positive β values
showed Gaussian shapes in PF trend as shown in the inset in Figure c; the molecules 3 and 1 have the lowest (2.5 × 10–9 μW m–1 K–2) and highest (3.2 × 10–8 μW m–1 K–2) PFpeak values, respectively (Figure c). The molecules 9 exhibit negative β, in which conductivity increases
with increasing the molecular length.[52] This negative sign of β yielded the trend of PF’s length
dependence that was completely different from those for the molecules
with the positive β: the PF increased with increasing the length
for the molecules 9 (Figure d). Notably, we observed that PF begins to
exponentially increase at the point of d = ∼
70 Å. Interestingly, our simulation enabled us to propose the
number of thiophene units in the molecules 9 to rival
the PF values of PEDOT/PSS[15] and hybrid
materials (PANI/graphene/DWCN, where DWCN is the double-walled carbon
nanotube)[16] exhibiting great thermoelectric
performances. This simulation was based on the assumption that the
values of β and βS are linearly extrapolated
to systems beyond short oligomers. When the molecules 9 become longer (up to 23 and 25 thiophene units, which correspond
to the one molecule thick films of ∼9.1 and ∼9.7 nm,
respectively), the PF values can reach the values of the PEDOT/PSS
and the hybrid materials.As described in oligophenylenes (Figure c–e), we could
take into account the
occurrence of the transport regime transition from tunneling to hopping
in long oligothiophenes. Our simulation showed that, if hopping dominates
in both thermopower and conductance while the sign of β and
βS does not change, the exponential increase
in PF can be still observed, although the PF values equivalent to
those of the PEDOT:PSS and the hybrid materials can be achieved by
a factor of ∼5 longer molecules (420 and 476 Å) than those
predicted in pure tunnelling (Figure e). If the transition also causes the inversion of
sign in β, the trend of exponential increase with length is
no longer valid, and a peak value (PFpeak = 1.0 ×
10–2) is observed at the boundary of the transition
(Figure f). This finding
implies that the length dependence of conductance has a more pronounced
effect on PF than the length dependence of thermopower. Further study
will be needed to confirm this prediction. The simulation results
for the cases where one of β and βS changes
due to the transition of transport regime are summarized in Figures S16 and S17 in the Supporting Information.
Exponential increase of PF was observed unless the sign of β
did not change; however, if the sign of β was inversed, the
length dependence of PF almost disappeared.Although this work
is fundamental in nature, thermoelectric performance
of SAM-based devices warrants further investigation, considering that
organic thin film thermoelectric materials have recently received
an increased amount of attention for use in micro-thermoelectric generators
(μ-TEGs) suitable for converting low-grade waste heat into electricity.[11,14,15,54] In this regard, determination of the dimensionless figure of merit
(ZT = (κS2/λ)T) of a SAM-based junction can be insightful. By taking
the thermal conductivity value (λ = 3.6 × 104 μW m–1 K–1 for SC12) experimentally determined in recent studies (see the Supporting Information for details),[55−57] the ZT value estimated for the SC12 SAM
as an exemplary case was 6.6 × 10–14 for the
noncorrected PF at T = 295 K, and the corrected PF
ranged from 6.6 × 10–11 to 6.6 × 10–8. Note that the ZT value of SAM-based
junction cannot be straightforwardly compared with that of other organic
semiconductors unless the operating temperature is the same.
Conclusion
In this work, the PFs of one molecule thick
organic films, SAMs,
were experimentally determined for the first time. Statistically robust
values for the tunneling conductivity and Seebeck coefficient at identical
junctions were measured, which allowed reliable PF values to be estimated
for SAMs. We derived a useful parametric semiempirical equation to
investigate the effects of β and βS on the
length dependence of PF. Our simulation using this equation proposes
that ultrathin organic films (e.g., less than 10 nm) can yield PF
values that rival conventional high-performance organic materials.
Given that recent studies[58−60] show the thermal conductance
across single molecules does not depend on the length of molecule,
our work reveals the potential of ultrathin organic films as active
materials for thermoelectric generators. Moreover, this work offers
an unprecedented opportunity to harness SAM-based junctions as a nanoscale
platform for establishing structure–PF relationships at the
molecular level.
Authors: J Christopher Love; Lara A Estroff; Jennah K Kriebel; Ralph G Nuzzo; George M Whitesides Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Seong Ho Choi; Chad Risko; M Carmen Ruiz Delgado; Bongsoo Kim; Jean-Luc Brédas; C Daniel Frisbie Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Hyo Jae Yoon; Nathan D Shapiro; Kyeng Min Park; Martin M Thuo; Siowling Soh; George M Whitesides Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Christopher E Smith; Samuel O Odoh; Soumen Ghosh; Laura Gagliardi; Christopher J Cramer; C Daniel Frisbie Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Olga E Castañeda Ocampo; Pavlo Gordiichuk; Stefano Catarci; Daniel A Gautier; Andreas Herrmann; Ryan C Chiechi Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Yanxi Zhang; Saurabh Soni; Theodorus L Krijger; Pavlo Gordiichuk; Xinkai Qiu; Gang Ye; Harry T Jonkman; Andreas Herrmann; Karin Zojer; Egbert Zojer; Ryan C Chiechi Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Chuanshen Du; Zhengjia Wang; Jiahao Chen; Andrew Martin; Dhruv Raturi; Martin Thuo Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 16.823