| Literature DB >> 31892969 |
Ning Zhang1, Siteng Chen2, Guangliang Jiang1, Yishuo Wu3, Jialiang Shao2, Wennuan Liu4, Xiang Wang2, Rong Na1, Jianfeng Xu3,4.
Abstract
Objectives: Copy number alteration (CNA) is one of the important genetic variations. Although there are many studies on renal cancer CNA, few studies are based on the Chinese population. In our study, our objective is to acquire the whole-genome CNA landscape in Chinese population and explore the tumor risk-associated functional genes in the CNA regions, by detecting whole-genome in the clear cell renal cancer (ccRCC) tissues.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese; Oncoscan; ccRCC; copy number alteration; enrichment; gene burden
Year: 2020 PMID: 31892969 PMCID: PMC6930398 DOI: 10.7150/jca.33316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Demographic and clinical information of study population
| Variables | ccRCC (n=35) | |
|---|---|---|
| No. of cases | 35 | |
| Age (yr), Median (range) | 55 (40-85) | |
| Male | 21 (60%) | |
| Female | 14 (40%) | |
| Tumor size (cm), Median (Range) | 3.5 (2-13) | |
| T1a | 22 (63%) | |
| T1b | 6 (17%) | |
| T2a | 4 (11%) | |
| T2b | 2 (6%) | |
| T3a | 1 (3%) | |
| N0 | 35 (100%) | |
| N1 | 0 | |
| M0 | 35 (100%) | |
| M1 | 0 | |
| I | 1 (3%) | |
| II | 17 (48%) | |
| III | 3 (9%) | |
| IV | 0 | |
| Missing | 14 (40%) | |
ccRCC, clear cell renal cancer; yr, year.
Figure 1Landscape of whole-genome copy number alteration (CNA). The red and blue areas respectively represented copy number loss and copy number gain, and the statue of whole-genome CNA in 24 chromosomes of 35 clear cell renal cancer samples was observed clearly.
Figure 2Heatmap based on copy number alteration regions of high frequency and representative functional genes. The red and blue areas respectively represented copy number loss and copy number gain. The left histograms showed percentages of affected samples.
CNAs of ccRCC with highest frequencies (≥20%) in Chinese and the comparison with TCGA cohort (mainly European Americans)
| Chr | Region | Chinese (n=35) | TCGA (n=537) | Affected Genes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Frequency | Event | Frequency | |||||
| 3 | p26.2 | Del | 48.57% | Del | 91% | MECOM | ||
| p25.3 | Del | 71.43% | Del | 11% | VHL | |||
| p22-p21 | Del | 74.29% | Del | 89-92% | BAP1, SETD2 | |||
| p12.1 | Del | 31.43% | Del | 51% | CADM2 | |||
| q21 | Amp | 31.43% | Amp | 0.4% | CNBP | |||
| 5 | q31.2 | Amp | 51.43% | Amp | 14% | EGR1, PKD2L2 | ||
| q35.3 | Amp | 48.57% | Amp | 15% | SQSTM1 | |||
| 7 | q22.1 | Amp | 20.00% | Amp | 0.7% | RADIL, TRRAP, ZAN | ||
| 8 | q24.21 | Amp | 25.71% | Amp | 15% | MYC | ||
| 11 | p11 | Amp | 31.43% | - | - | OR4C12,MDK | ||
| 13 | q21 | Del | 22.86% | Del | 0.20% | RB1 | ||
| 14 | q | Del | 51.43% | Del | 45% | HIF1A,NRXN3 | ||
| 16 | p11.2-p11.1 | LOH | 100% | - | - | SMG1P2 | ||
| 17 | q21.33 | Amp | 31.43% | Amp | 0.40% | ABCC3 | ||
| 19 | q13.2 | Amp | 28.57% | Amp | 0.20% | WTIP | ||
| 20 | q11.3 | Del | 20.00% | - | - | PDRG1 | ||
| 22 | q11.23 | Amp | 45.71% | - | - | PLA2G6 | ||
| X | p22.33 | Amp | 62.86% | - | - | XGY2 | ||
| q28 | Amp | 40% | Amp | 0.80% | SPRY3 | |||
CNA, copy number alteration; ccRCC, clear cell renal cancer; TCGA, the Cancer Genome Atlas; Chr, chromosome; Del, delete; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; Amp, amplification.
Figure 3Genes functional annotation and enrichment. 4437 genes which were located in the CNA regions with the frequency ≥10% were included in the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery to analyze genes annotation and enrichment.
CN status of the genes in different pathways that are significantly enriched
| Pathways | Related genes | Chinese | TCGA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Frequency | Event | Frequency | |||
| Regulation of mRNA stability | EXOSC7 | Del | 71.43% | Del | 10% | |
| PRKCD | Del | 71.43% | Del | 9% | ||
| TRIM71 | Del | 68.57% | Del | 10% | ||
| HNRNPA0 | Amp | 45.71% | Amp | 13% | ||
| METTL3 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| PSME1 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| DNA repair | DDB2 | Amp | 31.43% | - | - | |
| PARP2 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| TTC5 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| APEX1 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| SUPT16H | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| REC8 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| FAN1 | Amp | 31.43% | - | - | ||
| EGFR | Amp | 37.14% | Del | 0.20% | ||
| KIF22 | LOH | 34.29% | Amp | 0.20% | ||
| PPP4C | LOH | 48.57% | Amp | 0.20% | ||
| INO80E | LOH | 42.86% | Amp | 0.20% | ||
| PAGR1 | LOH | 34.29% | Amp | 0.20% | ||
| DNA modification | DNMT3A | Amp | 11.42% | - | - | |
| EHMT2 | Amp | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| ASCC1 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| CCNB1IP1 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| CTCF | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| Notch signaling pathway | MDK | Amp | 31.43% | - | - | |
| MMP14 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| FOXA1 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| TOR signaling pathway | TSC2 | Del | 14.29% | Amp | 0.20% | |
| TELO2 | LOH | 11.43% | Amp | 0.20% | ||
| WDR24 | LOH | 11.43% | Amp | 0.20% | ||
| MLST8 | Del | 14.29% | Amp | 0.20% | ||
| Wnt signaling pathway | PSMB5 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | |
| PSMB11 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| PSME2 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| Tumor necrosis factor superfamily | PYCARD | LOH | 65.71% | Amp | 0.20% | |
| GHRL | Del | 68.57% | Del | 11% | ||
| CCR2 | Del | 74.29% | Del | 10% | ||
| MYD88 | Del | 71.43% | Del | 10% | ||
| LTF | Del | 74.29% | Del | 11% | ||
| Inflammatory response | TUSC2 | Del | 68.57% | Del | 10% | |
| PPARG | Del | 68.57% | Del | 11% | ||
| IL17RC | Del | 71.43% | Del | 11% | ||
| CCRL2 | Del | 74.29% | Del | 11% | ||
| HIF1A | Del | 14.29% | Del | 0.60% | ||
| LTB4R | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| IL25 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| LTB4R2 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
| NFATC4 | Del | 11.42% | - | - | ||
CN, copy number; TCGA, the Cancer Genome Atlas; Del, delete; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; Amp, amplification.
Tumor suppressors and Oncogenes associated with ccRCC in this study
| Function | Genes | Region | Chinese | TCGA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Frequency | Event | Frequency | |||
| Tumor suppressors(23) | TADA3 | 3p25.3 | Del | 71.43% | Del | 11.00% |
| VHL* | 3p25.3 | Del | 71.43% | Del | 11.00% | |
| PLCD1 | 3p22.2 | Del | 71.43% | Del | 11.00% | |
| CSRNP1 | 3p22.2 | Del | 71.43% | Del | 11.00% | |
| LZTFL1 | 3p21.31 | Del | 74.29% | Del | 11.00% | |
| LRRC2 | 3p21.31 | Del | 74.29% | Del | 11.00% | |
| SEMA3B | 3p21.31 | Del | 66.57% | Del | 11.00% | |
| NAT6 | 3p21.31 | Del | 68.57% | Del | 11.00% | |
| TUSC2 | 3p21.31 | Del | 68.57% | Del | 11.00% | |
| RASSF1 | 3p21.31 | Del | 68.57% | Del | 11.00% | |
| PCBP4 | 3p21.2 | Del | 71.43% | Del | 11.00% | |
| BAP1* | 3p21.1 | Del | 71.43% | Del | 10.00% | |
| ERC2-IT1 | 3p14.3 | Del | 71.43% | - | - | |
| PTPRG | 3p14.2 | Del | 57.14% | Del | 5.00% | |
| FOXP1 | 3p13 | Del | 42.86% | Del | 2.70% | |
| RBM5 | 3p21.31 | Del | 68.57% | Del | 10% | |
| LATS2 | 13q12.11 | Del | 17.14% | Del | 0.20% | |
| RNF6 | 13q12.13 | Del | 17.14% | Del | 0.20% | |
| DLK1 | 14q32.2 | Del | 11.43% | Del | 0.40% | |
| MEG3 | 14q32.2 | Del | 11.43% | Del | 0.40% | |
| TSC2 | 16p13.3 | Del | 14.29% | Amp | 0.20% | |
| RNF40 | 16p11.2 | LOH | 57.14% | Amp | 0.20% | |
| STK11 | 19p13.3 | Del | 20.00% | Del | 0.20% | |
| Oncogenes (10) | ABL2 | 1q25.2 | Amp | 14.29% | Amp | 0.80% |
| RAB10 | 2p23.3 | Amp | 11.43% | - | - | |
| ADGRA3 | 4p15.2 | Amp | 11.43% | - | - | |
| BRAF | 7q34 | Amp | 17.14% | Amp | 0.90% | |
| MET* | 7q31.2 | Amp | 28.57% | Amp | 0.90% | |
| LYN | 8q12.1 | Amp | 14.29% | Amp | 0.40% | |
| MOS | 8q12.1 | Amp | 14.29% | Amp | 0.40% | |
| RAB2A | 8q12.1 | Amp | 14.29% | Amp | 0.40% | |
| RNF139 | 8q24.13 | Amp | 14.29% | Amp | 0.80% | |
| HUWE1 | Xp11.22 | Amp | 11.43% | Del | 0.60% | |
*: The genes associated with renal cancer have been reported in previous studies; -: not available; ccRCC, clear cell renal cancer; TCGA, the Cancer Genome Atlas; Del, delete; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; Amp, amplification.
Figure 4The relatively high-frequency gene fusion in 22q11.23. The red and blue areas respectively represented copy number loss and copy number gain. Two genes fusion (GSTTP1 and GSTTP2) located at two sides of copy number loss fragment were observed.
CNA burden in ccRCC patients.
| Event | Average level (%) | No. of cases with high level of CAN (n, %) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 (n=28) | T2+T3 (N=7) | P-value | ||
| Amplification | 2.91% | 13 (46.43%) | 4 (57.14%) | 0.69 |
| Deletion | 2.49% | 13 (46.43%) | 4 (57.14%) | 0.69 |
| Amplification and deletion | 5.40% | 13 (46.43%) | 7 (100%) | 0.012* |
| Loss of heterozygosity | 5.08% | 13 (46.43%) | 4 (57.14%) | 0.69 |
CNA, copy number alteration; ccRCC, clear cell renal cancer; *: P-value < 0.05.