Literature DB >> 31892475

Admitting women in active labour: A randomised controlled trial about the effects of protocol use on childbirth method and interventions.

Freshteh Abasian Kasegari1, Farzaneh Pazandeh2, Soodabeh Darvish3, Reinhard Huss4, Malihe Nasiri1.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the effects of protocol of admitting women in active labour on childbirth method and interventions during labour and childbirth.
METHODS: This single-blind randomised clinical trial was conducted in a public hospital in Mazandaran province (Iran) in 2017. Two hundred nulliparous low-risk women were randomly assigned into intervention and control groups. The participant women were admitted in the intervention group using the admission protocol and to the group control by staff midwives and doctors. The admission criteria of the protocol were: the presence of regular, painful contractions, the cervix at least four cm dilated and at least one of the following cues: cervix effaced, and spontaneous rupture of membranes, or "show". The primary outcome measure was childbirth method. Data were analyzed in SPSS-22 using Mann-Whitney and Chi-square tests. The level of statistical significance was set as p<0.05. FINDING: There were significant differences between the intervention and control groups in the number of caesarian section (CS) (p<0.001). Two groups had a statistically significant difference in amniotomy (p=0.003), augmentation by oxytocin (p<0.001), number of vaginal examinations (p<0.001) and fundal pressure (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Using a protocol for admission of low risk nulliparous women in active labour contributed to reduction of the primary caesarean section rate and interventions during childbirth. A risk assessment and using evidence informed guidelines in admission can contribute to reduce unsafe and harmful practices and support normalisation of birth. This is essential for demedicalisation and a useful strategy for reducing primary CS.
Copyright © 2019 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean section; Intrapartum interventions; Labour onset

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31892475     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  3 in total

Review 1.  The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elise Farrington; Mairead Connolly; Laura Phung; Alyce N Wilson; Liz Comrie-Thomson; Meghan A Bohren; Caroline S E Homer; Joshua P Vogel
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ).

Authors:  Samiyeh Kazemi; Anna Dencker; Farzaneh Pazandeh; Ali Montazeri; Sedigheh Sedigh-Mobarakabadi; Sepideh Hajian
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Development and validation of a predictive model to identify the active phase of labor.

Authors:  Simona Fumagalli; Laura Antolini; Greta Cosmai; Teresa Gramegna; Antonella Nespoli; Astrid Pedranzini; Elisabetta Colciago; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Patrizia Vergani; Anna Locatelli
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.105

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.