Literature DB >> 31892310

Correction to: Comparative transcriptomics reveals PrrABmediated control of metabolic, respiration, energy-generating, and dormancy pathways in Mycobacterium smegmatis.

Jason D Maarsingh1,2, Shanshan Yang3, Jin G Park4, Shelley E Haydel5,6.   

Abstract

Following the publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in Fig. 2 of the PDF version of their article.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31892310      PMCID: PMC6937835          DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6419-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


Correction to: BMC Genomics https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6105-3 Following the publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in Fig. 1 of the PDF version of their article. Due to a typesetting mistake, a previous version of the figure was placed in the PDF, which therefore did not match the correct Fig. 2 given in the HTML version.
Fig. 2

Global DEG profiles (q < 0.05) between the mc2 155 vs. FDL10 and FDL15 vs. FDL10 RNA-seq comparisons. Volcano plots of (a) FDL10 vs. mc2 155 and (b) FDL10 vs. FDL15 group comparisons with red and blue dots representing differentially-expressed genes with p < 0.05 and q < 0.05, respectively. The horizontal hatched line indicates p = 0.05 threshold, while the left and right vertical dotted lines indicate log2 fold change of − 1 and + 1, respectively. c Repressed (blue) and induced (yellow) DEGs (q < 0.05) in mc2 155 (WT) and FDL15 (prrAB complementation strain) compared to the FDL10 ΔprrAB mutant. d Average hierarchical clustering (FPKM + 1) of individual RNA-seq sample replicates. e Venn diagrams indicating 40 overlapping DEGs (q < 0.05) between mc2 155 vs. FDL10 (WT vs. ΔprrAB mutant) and FDL15 vs. FDL10 (prrAB complementation strain vs. ΔprrAB mutant) strain comparisons

Fig. 2

Global DEG profiles (q < 0.05) between the mc2 155 vs. FDL10 and FDL15 vs. FDL10 RNA-seq comparisons. Volcano plots of (a) FDL10 vs. mc2 155 and (b) FDL10 vs. FDL15 group comparisons with red and blue dots representing differentially-expressed genes with p < 0.05 and q < 0.05, respectively. The horizontal hatched line indicates p = 0.05 threshold, while the left and right vertical dotted lines indicate log2 fold change of − 1 and + 1, respectively. c Repressed (blue) and induced (yellow) DEGs (q < 0.05) in mc2 155 (WT) and FDL15 (prrAB complementation strain) compared to the FDL10 ΔprrAB mutant. d Average hierarchical clustering (FPKM + 1) of individual RNA-seq sample replicates. e Venn diagrams indicating 40 overlapping DEGs (q < 0.05) between mc2 155 vs. FDL10 (WT vs. ΔprrAB mutant) and FDL15 vs. FDL10 (prrAB complementation strain vs. ΔprrAB mutant) strain comparisons

The incorrect figure was: Global DEG profiles (q < 0.05) between the mc2 155 vs. FDL10 and FDL15 vs. FDL10 RNA-seq comparisons. Volcano plots of (a) FDL10 vs. mc2 155 and (b) FDL10 vs. FDL15 group comparisons with red and blue dots representing differentially-expressed genes with p < 0.05 and q < 0.05, respectively. The horizontal hatched line indicates p = 0.05 threshold, while the left and right vertical dotted lines indicate log2 fold change of − 1 and + 1, respectively. c Repressed (blue) and induced (yellow) DEGs (q < 0.05) in mc2 155 (WT) and FDL15 (prrAB complementation strain) compared to the FDL10 ΔprrAB mutant. d Average hierarchical clustering (FPKM + 1) of individual RNA-seq sample replicates. e Venn diagrams indicating 40 overlapping DEGs (q < 0.05) between mc2 155 vs. FDL10 (WT vs. ΔprrAB mutant) and FDL15 vs. FDL10 (prrAB complementation strain vs. ΔprrAB mutant) strain comparisons The correct figure is: Global DEG profiles (q < 0.05) between the mc2 155 vs. FDL10 and FDL15 vs. FDL10 RNA-seq comparisons. Volcano plots of (a) FDL10 vs. mc2 155 and (b) FDL10 vs. FDL15 group comparisons with red and blue dots representing differentially-expressed genes with p < 0.05 and q < 0.05, respectively. The horizontal hatched line indicates p = 0.05 threshold, while the left and right vertical dotted lines indicate log2 fold change of − 1 and + 1, respectively. c Repressed (blue) and induced (yellow) DEGs (q < 0.05) in mc2 155 (WT) and FDL15 (prrAB complementation strain) compared to the FDL10 ΔprrAB mutant. d Average hierarchical clustering (FPKM + 1) of individual RNA-seq sample replicates. e Venn diagrams indicating 40 overlapping DEGs (q < 0.05) between mc2 155 vs. FDL10 (WT vs. ΔprrAB mutant) and FDL15 vs. FDL10 (prrAB complementation strain vs. ΔprrAB mutant) strain comparisons The original article has been corrected.
  1 in total

1.  Comparative transcriptomics reveals PrrAB-mediated control of metabolic, respiration, energy-generating, and dormancy pathways in Mycobacterium smegmatis.

Authors:  Jason D Maarsingh; Shanshan Yang; Jin G Park; Shelley E Haydel
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 3.969

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.