| Literature DB >> 31892179 |
Yuhui Pi1, Yan Li2, Yingxing Pi1, Zhe Huang2, Zhe Li2.
Abstract
The strength of EACRM (emulsified asphalt cold recycled mixture) is closely related to the properties and proportion of raw materials. In this paper, the strength formation mechanism of EACRM was first studied through microscopic analysis, and the influence regular of aggregate gradation, emulsified asphalt, water consumption, cement consumption, and other factors on its strength was analyzed through a series of laboratory tests. The analysis results show that the asphalt binder plays the role of cementing material in cement emulsified asphalt mortar. The combination of cement and emulsified asphalt is a physical combination. The hydration product not only increases the viscosity of asphalt cement, but also makes the surface of asphalt cement become uneven, which increases the adhesion area with the aggregate. Therefore, the microstructure of the interface between mortar and aggregate is improved. The bonding force of the interface and the mechanical properties of concrete are improved. Due to the influence of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) materials, the excessive amount of emulsified asphalt and cement are not conducive to improve the strength of cold recycled mixture. Through experiments, the optimal amount of emulsified asphalt and cement is determined as 2.9% and 1.5%, respectively, for the RAP materials. At the same time, improving the performance of emulsified asphalt and adding quicklime and organic activator are also helpful to improve the strength of a cold recycled mixture.Entities:
Keywords: cold recycled asphalt mixture; emulsified asphalt; microscopic mechanism; strength
Year: 2019 PMID: 31892179 PMCID: PMC6982332 DOI: 10.3390/ma13010128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Technical properties of No. 70 matrix asphalt.
| Indicators | Unit | Level | The Technical Requirements | Test Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penetration (25 °C, 5 s, 100 g) | 0.1 mm | N/A | 60~80 | 69 |
| Penetration index (PI) | N/A | A | −1.5~+1.0 | 0.3 |
| Softening point ≥ | °C | A | 46 | 51 |
| 60 °C Dynamic viscosity ≥ | Pa·s | A | 180 | 230 |
| 10 °C Ductility ≥ | cm | A | 15 | 38 |
| 15 °C Ductility ≥ | cm | A | 100 | 130 |
| The wax content ≤ | % | A | 2.2 | 0.5 |
| Flash point ≥ | °C | N/A | 260 | 284 |
| Solubility ≥ | % | N/A | 99.5 | 99.8 |
| Density (15 °C) | g/cm3 | N/A | The measured records | 1.03 |
| Residual penetration ratio (2 °C) ≥ | % | A | 61 | 70 |
| Residual ductility (10 °C) ≥ | cm | A | 6 | 11 |
Technical properties of P·O 42.5.
| Technical Indicators | Test Results | Requirements | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fineness (%) (0.08 mm Square hole sieve allowance) | 3.4 | ≤10 | |
| Initial setting time (min) | 180 | ≥45 | |
| Final setting time (min) | 360 | ≤390 | |
| Stability (Boiling method) | Qualified | Must be qualified | |
| Compressive strength (MPa) | 3 d | 20.1 | ≥17 |
| 28 d | 48.8 | ≥42.5 | |
| Flexural strength (MPa) | 3 d | 4.6 | ≥3.5 |
| 28 d | 7.8 | ≥6.5 | |
Gradation parameters.
| Grading Type | Coarse Materials (%) | Middle Materials (%) | Fine Materials (%) | New Aggregates (%) | Mineral Powder (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grading 1 | 28 | 32 | 15 | 20 | 5 |
| Grading 2 | 35 | 32 | 8 | 20 | 5 |
| Grading 3 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 20 | 5 |
Basic properties of different emulsified asphalts.
| Types of Asphalts | Asphalt Content (%) | Softening Point (°C) | Penetration (25 °C at 0.1 mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jiangsu ordinary emulsified asphalt | 60.1 | 49.0 | N/A |
| Jiangsu emulsified asphalt with high viscosity | 65.6 | 60.5 | N/A |
| Zhejiang medium breaking emulsified asphalt | 58.7 | 50.5 | 69 |
Figure 1Microstructure of cement-emulsified asphalt mortar.
Figure 2Microstructure of cement-emulsified asphalt mortar after cleaning.
Figure 3Design gradation curve.
Intensity of different grades.
| Items | Unconfined Compressive Strength (MPa) | Dry Splitting Strength (MPa) | Wet Splitting Strength (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coarse | 3.240 | 0.333 | 0.305 |
| Middle | 2.939 | 0.330 | 0.300 |
| Fine | 1.928 | 0.308 | 0.273 |
Figure 4Curve of the moisture content and dry density.
Performance of specimens with different moisture contents.
| The Percentage of Water Added | Dry Splitting Strength (MPa) | Wet Splitting Strength (MPa) | Residual Strength (MPa) | Gross Bulk Density (g/cm3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.8% | 0.266 | 0.200 | 0.749 | 2.137 |
| 5.8% | 0.280 | 0.229 | 0.816 | 2.122 |
| 6.8% | 0.326 | 0.283 | 0.866 | 2.191 |
| 7.8% | 0.480 | 0.410 | 0.855 | 2.207 |
Figure 5Strength of different asphalt mixtures with different gradations.
Density of different asphalt content for different gradations.
| Grading Type | Emulsified Asphalt Dose | Gross Bulk Density (g/cm3) |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 1 | 3% | 2.15 |
| 4% | 2.17 | |
| 5% | 2.16 | |
| Grade 2 | 3% | 2.21 |
| 4% | 2.19 | |
| 5% | 2.16 | |
| Grade 3 | 3% | 2.12 |
| 4% | 2.12 | |
| 5% | 2.11 |
Figure 6Relationship between density and strength of the cold recycled specimen.
Cleavage strength of samples with different EACRMs.
| Types of Asphalt | 15 °C Splitting Strength (MPa) |
|---|---|
| Jiangsu ordinary emulsified asphalt | 0.66 |
| Jiangsu emulsified high viscosity asphalt | 0.67 |
| Zhejiang medium cracked emulsified asphalt | 0.61 |
Influence of emulsified asphalt on strength development of cold recycled mixture.
| Types of Asphalt | The Splitting Strength (MPa) and Relative Ratio of the Specimens under Different Health Maintenance Times | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 d | 3 d | 4 d | 7 d | Criterion | |
| Jiangsu ordinary emulsified asphalt | 0.155 (100%) | 0.209 (100%) | 0.271 (100%) | 0.306 (100%) | 0.66 (100%) |
| Jiangsu emulsified high viscosity asphalt | 0.122 (79%) | 0.139 (67%) | 0.266 (98%) | 0.281 (92%) | 0.67 (102%) |
| Zhejiang medium cracked emulsified asphalt | 0.078 (50%) | 0.162 (78%) | 0.211 (78%) | 0.242 (79%) | 0.61 (92%) |
Figure 7Water loss of samples prepared by different emulsifying leaching.
Strength of three asphalt cement mixtures.
| Oil-Stone Ratio | Emulsified Asphalt | Evaporation Residue of Emulsified Asphalt | Ordinary Asphalt | Emulsified Asphalt Accounts for Residual Asphalt | Emulsified Asphalt Accounts for Common Asphalt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.6 (6) | 0.24 | 0.68 | 1.12 | 34.6% | 21.1% |
| 3.3 (5.5) | 0.25 | 0.73 | 1.19 | 34.0% | 20.7% |
| 3 (5) | 0.28 | 0.83 | 1.25 | 34.2% | 22.7% |
Figure 8Cleavage face ratio of emulsified asphalt mixture specimen and thermoplastic specimen.
Figure 9Strength of different cement doses.
Figure 10Influence of lime on the strength of a cold recycled specimen.
Mass (g) loss of the mixture seven days before the room temperature regimen.
| 1 d | 2 d | 3 d | 4 d | 5 d | 6 d | 7 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plus 1% lime | 13.0 | 17.7 | 8.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.7 |
| Not lime | 13.3 | 18.0 | 4.7 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.7 |
Intensity values of the room temperature regimen on day 3, day 5, and day 7.
| 1% Lime | Ordinary | Increase the Proportion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | 0.29 | 0.25 | 16.0% |
| 5 d | 0.47 | 0.45 | 4.4% |
| 7 d | 0.56 | 0.5 | 12.0% |
Figure 11Comparison of strength by adding an organic activator.