| Literature DB >> 31891154 |
Yu-Ichiro Ohnishi1, Nobuhiko Nakajima1, Tomofumi Takenaka1, Sho Fujiwara1, Shinpei Miura1, Eisaku Terada1, Shuhei Yamada1, Haruhiko Kishima1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We present a case series of spinal cord cavernous malformations (SCCMs) to describe clinical presentation and outcomes of both surgical and conservative management.Entities:
Keywords: Cavernous malformation; Conservative therapy; Follow-up time; MMCS, Modified McCormick Scale; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; SCCM, Spinal cord cavernous malformation; Spinal cord; Surgery
Year: 2019 PMID: 31891154 PMCID: PMC6931213 DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2019.100066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World Neurosurg X ISSN: 2590-1397
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier plots of (A) time to subsequent hemorrhage or deterioration of symptoms and (B) surgery.
Baseline Patient Characteristics
| Parameter | All Patients (n = 18) | Non-operation (n = 5) | Immediate Surgery (n = 5) | Surgery (n = 8) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 36.9 (9–68) | 43.4 (25–68) | 25.6 (9–49) | 39.9 (15–68) | 0.2986 |
| Male | 11 (61.1) | 4 (80) | 3 (60) | 4 (50) | 0.6043 |
| Location | 0.2231 | ||||
| Cervical | 6 (33.3) | 3 (60) | 2 (40) | 1 (12.5) | |
| Thoracic | 12 (66.7) | 2 (40) | 3 (60) | 7 (87.5) | |
| Size, mm | 15.6 ± 6.3 | 10.8 ± 4.1 | 19.8 ± 5.9 | 14.5 ± 4.9 | 0.0390 |
| Location | 0.7881 | ||||
| Superficial | 6 (33.3) | 2 (40) | 1 (20) | 3 (37.5) | |
| Deep | 12 (66.7) | 3 (60) | 4 (80) | 5 (62.5) | |
| Pain | 5 (27.7) | 5 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.0005 |
| Weakness | 12 (66.6) | 1 (13.3) | 5 (100) | 7 (87.5) | 0.0194 |
| Sensory deficits | 15 (83.3) | 3 (60) | 5 (100) | 8 (100) | 0.1825 |
| Bladder and rectal dysfunction | 4 (22.2) | 0 (0) | 4 (80) | 0 (0) | 0.022 |
| Presentation interval, years | 1.95 (0.25–4.33) | 1.83 | - | 1.97 (0.25–4.33) | |
| Time to surgery, years | 2.10 (0.25–5.00) | - | - | 2.10 (0.25–5.00) |
Values are presented as: mean (range); n (%); or mean ± SD.
Significant difference (P < 0.05) between groups.
Preoperative and Postoperative Modified McCormick Scale (MMCS) Grades
| Parameter | All Patients (n = 18) | Non-operation (n = 5) | Immediate Surgery (n = 5) | Surgery (n = 8) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretreatment MMCS | ||||
| 1 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 2 | 6 (33.3) | 5 (100) | 0 (0) | 1 (0) |
| 3 | 4 (22.2) | 0 (0) | 1 (20) | 3 (0) |
| 4 | 5 (27.8) | 0 (0) | 2 (30) | 3 (0) |
| 5 | 3 (16.7) | 0 (0) | 2 (30) | 1 (0) |
| Final follow-up MMCS | ||||
| 1 | 2 (11.1) | 1 (20) | 0 (0) | 1 (0) |
| 2 | 10 (55.6) | 3 (60) | 3 (60) | 4 (0) |
| 3 | 4 (22.2) | 1 (20) | 1 (20) | 2 (0) |
| 4 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 5 | 2 (11.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (20) | 1 (0) |
| 0.539 | 0.057 | 0.061 |
Values are presented as n (%).
Figure 2Example magnetic resonance images of conservative cases. (A) Onset magnetic resonance image. (B) Final follow-up magnetic resonance image.
Figure 3Example magnetic resonance images of surgical cases. (A) Onset magnetic resonance image. (B) Final follow-up magnetic resonance image.
Differences Between MMCS Grade in the Length of Lesion, Length of Hemorrhage, and Location
| Parameter | MMCS Grade 2 (n = 5) | MMCS Grade 3 (n = 5) | MMCS Grade 4 (n = 4) | MMCS Grade 5 (n = 3) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length of lesions, mm | 11.5 ± 4.0 | 18.0 ± 4.0 | 15.2 ± 7.6 | 17.3 ± 6.8 | 0.3193 |
| Length of hemorrhage, mm | 25.5 ± 18.0 | 31.1 ± 9.6 | 58.6 ± 31.5 | 132.4 ± 19.8 | 0.0004 |
| Location | 0.4259 | ||||
| Superficial | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| Deep | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD or n.
Significant difference (P < 0.05) between groups.
Clinical Data From the 17 Eligible Articles That Had Over 10 Patients
| Study | No. of Patients | Male (%) | Mean Age (Years) | Mean Size (mm) | Location (%) | Outcome (%) | Annualized Bleeding Risks (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | T | Improvement | Same | Worse | ||||||
| Cristante and Hermann, 1998 | 12 | 33.3 | 33.5 | 58.3 | 33.3 | 58.3 | 25.0 | 16.7 | ||
| Sandalcioglu et al., 2003 | 10 | 30 | 37.5 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 40.0 | 60.0 | 0 | 4.5 | |
| Santoro et al., 2004 | 10 | 50 | 40.9 | 9.6 | 40.0 | 60.0 | 90.0 | 10.0 | 0 | |
| Jallo et al., 2006 | 26 | 65.4 | 38.0 | 16.1 | 34.6 | 65.4 | 50.0 | 42.3 | 7.7 | |
| Bian et al., 2009 | 16 | 77.8 | 38.2 | 5.5 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 75.0 | 25.0 | 0 | 3.1 |
| Matsuyama et al., 2009 | 17 | 41.2 | 41.6 | 41.2 | 52.9 | 35.3 | 47.1 | 17.6 | ||
| Park et al., 2009 | 14 | 64.3 | 34.3 | 28.6 | 50.0 | 78.6 | 0 | 21.4 | 1.7 | |
| Lu and Lawton, 2010 | 22 | 59.1 | 42.0 | 27.3 | 72.7 | 40.9 | 50.0 | 9.1 | ||
| Steiger et al., 2010 | 20 | 45.0 | 39.2 | 35.0 | 60.0 | 47.1 | 41.2 | 11.7 | ||
| Aoyama et al. 2010 | 12 | 58.3 | 34.1 | 41.7 | 50 | 58.3 | 25.0 | 16.7 | ||
| Choi et al., 2010 | 21 | 38.1 | 39.3 | 11.7 | 47.6 | 47.6 | 47.6 | 42.9 | 9.5 | 2.1 |
| Liang et al., 2011 | 64 | 62.5 | 35.2 | 32.8 | 67.2 | 36.0 | 55.0 | 9.0 | ||
| Maslehaty et al., 2011 | 11 | 37.5 | 41.6 | 45.4 | 36.4 | 63.6 | 36.4 | 0 | ||
| Reitz et al., 2015 | 48 | 52.1 | 41.3 | 39.5 | 56.3 | 22.9 | 70.8 | 6.3 | ||
| Zhang et al., 2016 | 58 | 60.3 | 38.7 | 12.9 | 46.6 | 50.0 | 67.2 | 29.3 | 3.5 | 3.9 |
| Azad et al., 2018 | 32 | 41.0 | 44.2 | 7.1 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 23.0 | 73.0 | 4.0 | |
| Goyal et al., 2019 | 21 | 71.4 | 48.0 | 10.5 | 28.6 | 71.4 | 78.2 | 21.8 | 5.5 | |
| Present cases | 13 | 53.8 | 32.7 | 15.6 | 23.0 | 77.0 | 84.6 | 15.4 | 0 | 3.7 |
C, cervical; T, thoracic.