| Literature DB >> 31890225 |
Takashi Ito1,2, Takaaki Totoki1, Yayoi Yokoyama1, Tomotsugu Yasuda1, Hiroaki Furubeppu1, Shingo Yamada3, Ikuro Maruyama2, Yasuyuki Kakihana1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that anticoagulant therapy does not confer a survival benefit overall in sepsis, but might be beneficial in sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). In particular, those with high Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores might be the optimal target for anticoagulant therapy. However, both DIC and SOFA scores require the measurement of multiple markers. The purpose of this study was to explore a minimal marker set for determining coagulopathy at high risk of death in septic patients, wherein histone H3 levels were evaluated as indicators of both organ failure and coagulation activation.Entities:
Keywords: Diagnosis; Disseminated Intravascular coagulation (DIC); Histone; Sepsis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31890225 PMCID: PMC6933899 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-019-0420-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Intensive Care ISSN: 2052-0492
Fig. 1Serum histone H3 levels are correlated with coagulation markers. Correlations between serum histone H3 levels (ng/mL) and coagulation marker levels, including platelet counts (PLT, × 103/μL), fibrin(ogen) degradation products levels (FDP, μg/mL), thrombin-antithrombin complex levels (TAT, ng/mL), SIRS score, prothrombin time (PT) ratio, and antithrombin activity (AT, %), on ICU day 1 are shown. Spearman’s ρ and p values, are also shown. Logarithmic scales are used, except for SIRS score.
The new scoring system for identifying coagulopathy patients at high risk of death. The scoring system using serum histone H3 level and platelet counts is shown. A sum score of ≥ 3 is considered to be coagulopathy with high risk of death
| Histone H3 (ng/mL) | |
| < 3 | 0 |
| 3 ≤ < 9 | 1 |
| 9 ≤ | 2 |
| Platelet (× 103/μL) | |
| > 120 | 0 |
| 80 ≤ < 120 | 1 |
| ≤ 80 | 2 |
| Sum score | |
| 3 ≤ | Coagulopathy with high risk of death |
Diagnostic concordance rates between the JAAM DIC criteria and new scoring system. The diagnostic concordance rate between the JAAM DIC criteria and the new scoring system on ICU day 1 is 69%. This can be calculated by dividing the numbers of double-negative patients and double-positive patients (31 + 20) by the total number of patients (74). The mortality rates of the new and the JAAM DIC criteria-positive patients were 43% (9/21) and 21% (9/42), respectively. The mortality rates of the new and the JAAM DIC criteria-negative patients were 5.7% (3/53) and 9.4% (3/32), respectively
| Number of patients | JAAM DIC score | |||
| < 4 (negative) | 4 ≤ (positive) | Total | ||
| New score | < 3 (negative) | 31 | 22 | 53 |
| 3 ≤ (positive) | 1 | 20 | 21 | |
| total | 32 | 42 | 74 | |
| Mortality rate | JAAM DIC score | |||
| < 4 (negative) | 4 ≤ (positive) | Total | ||
| New score | < 3 (negative) | 6.5% (2/31) | 4.5% (1/22) | 5.7% (3/53) |
| 3 ≤ (positive) | 100% (1/1) | 40% (8/20) | 43% (9/21) | |
| Total | 9.4% (3/32) | 21% (9/42) | 16% (12/74) | |
Fig. 2The new scoring system clearly detect patients at high risk of death. Mortality rates of patients with each JAAM DIC score and the new score on ICU day 1 are shown. Dotted lines represent cut-off lines for JAAM DIC criteria and the new scoring system. The numerator and denominator of a fraction represent the number of non-survivors divided by the sum of the survivors + non-survivors in each score.