| Literature DB >> 31889985 |
Junfeng Hou1, Ying Zhang2, Xiuliang Jin1, Pengfei Dong3, Yanan Guo3, Keru Wang1, Yinghu Fan4, Shaokun Li1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High grain breakage rate is the main limiting factor encountered in the mechanical harvest of maize grain. X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT) scanning technology could be used to obtain the three-dimensional structure of maize grain. Currently, the effect of maize grain structure on the grain breakage rate, determined using X-ray μCT scanning technology, has not been reported. Therefore, the objectives of this study are: (i) to obtain the shape, geometry, and structural parameters related to the breakage rate using X-ray μCT scanning technology; (ii) to explore relationships between these parameters and grain breakage rate. RESULT: In this study, 28 parameters were determined using X-ray μCT scanning technology. The maize breakage rate was mainly influenced by the grain specific surface area, subcutaneous cavity volume, sphericity, and density. In particular, the breakage rate was directly affected by the subcutaneous cavity volume and density. The maize variety with high density and low subcutaneous cavity volume had a low breakage rate. The specific surface area (r = 0.758*), embryo specific surface area (r = 0.927**), subcutaneous cavity volume ratio (0.581*), and subcutaneous cavity volume (0.589*) of maize grain significantly and positively correlated with breakage rate. The cavity specific surface area (- 0.628*) and grain density (- 0.934**) of maize grain significantly and negatively correlated with grain breakage rates. Grain shape (length, width, thickness, and aspect ratio) positively correlated with grain breakage rate but the correlation did not reach statistical significance. The susceptibility of grain breakage increased when kernel weight decreased (- 0.371), but the effect was not significant.Entities:
Keywords: Breakage rate; Density; Maize grain; Shape; Subcutaneous cavity volume; Weight; X-ray μCT
Year: 2019 PMID: 31889985 PMCID: PMC6933881 DOI: 10.1186/s13007-019-0538-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Methods ISSN: 1746-4811 Impact factor: 4.993
Fig. 1Components distribution of grain 2-D image. a, b show the different grain components, the brightest region is embryo, second region is endosperm, black region inside the grain is cavity. Different positions of cavity are separated into three parts, which are subcutaneous cavity, endosperm cavity and embryo cavity, respectively
Fig. 2Three-dimensional measurement after the image reconstructed. The distance between the arrowheads is the dimension of length, width and thickness, respectively. Three colors represent the different parts of maize grain, green is endosperm, red is cavity space, blue is embryo
Fig. 3Image segmentation of the grain component. a1–a3 are the three aspects of grain raw image, respectively; b1–b3 are the region color segmentation; c1 is the merged 3-D imagery. Three colors represent the different parts of maize grain, green is endosperm, red is cavity space, blue is embryo
All parameters obtained through CT scan
| Parameters | Features | Formulas or diagrams |
|---|---|---|
| Width (W) | The left to right distance of 3D image | Figure |
| Length (L) | The top to bottom distance of 3D image | Figure |
| Thickness (T) | Distance between embryo side and endosperm side of 3D image | Figure |
| Aspect ratio (AR) | The ratio of length to width | AR = L/W |
| Weight (mg) | The weight of single grain | – |
| Grain volume (Vg) | The whole volume of grain 3D image | – |
| Endosperm volume (Ven) | The whole volume of endosperm 3D image | – |
| Embryo volume (Vem) | The whole volume of embryo 3D image | – |
| Cavity volume (Vc) | The whole volume of cavity 3D image | – |
| Subcutaneous cavity volume (Vsc) | The volume of subcutaneous cavity | – |
| Embryo cavity volume (Vemc) | The volume of embryo cavity | – |
| Endosperm cavity volume (Venc) | The volume of endosperm cavity | – |
| Grain surface area (SAg) | The surface area of grain 3D image | – |
| Endosperm surface area (SAen) | The surface area of endosperm 3D image | – |
| Embryo surface area (SAem) | The surface area of embryo 3D image | – |
| Cavity surface area (SAc) | The surface area of cavity 3D image | – |
| Grain specific surface area (SSAg) | The ratio of grain surface to volume | SAg/Vg |
| Endosperm specific surface area (SSAen) | The ratio of endosperm surface to volume | SAen/Ven |
| Embryo specific surface area (SSAem) | The ratio of embryo surface to volume | SAem/Vem |
| Cavity specific surface area (SSAc) | The ratio of cavity surface to volume | SAc/Vc |
| Endosperm volume ratio (VRen) | The ratio of endosperm volume to grain volume | Ven/Vg |
| Embryo volume ratio (VRem) | The ratio of embryo volume to grain volume | Vem/Vg |
| The cavity volume ratio (VRc) | The ratio of cavity volume to grain volume | Vc/Vg |
| Subcutaneous cavity volume ratio (VRsc) | The ratio of subcutaneous cavity volume to grain volume | Vsc/Vg |
| Embryo cavity volume ratio (VRemc) | The ratio of embryo cavity volume to grain volume | Vemc/Vg |
| Endosperm cavity volume ratio (VRenc) | The ratio of endosperm cavity volume to grain volume | Venc/Vg |
| Density (DE) | The ratio of grain mass to volume | mg/Vg |
| Sphericity (SP) | The ratio of surface area of the same volume sphere to grain surface area | d/SAg |
d surface area of same volume sphere
Comparison of breakage rates between six grain varieties
| Varieties | Breakage rate/% |
|---|---|
| KY3564 | 61.9a |
| M751 | 57.2b |
| DH618 | 56.4b |
| KX9384 | 54.6bc |
| LC808 | 51.6cd |
| XY335 | 49.7d |
Mean in the same column followed by different lower case letters indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05)
Comparison of structural parameters of different varieties
| Variety | Volume/mm3 | Volume ratio/% | Weight/g | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grain | Endosperm | Embryo | Cavity | SC | EMC | ENC | Endosperm | Embryo | Cavity | SC | EMC | ENC | Grain | |
| XY335 | 285.9ab | 248.5ab | 26.2b | 11.2a | 3.85ab | 3.51a | 3.80b | 86.9ab | 9.22ab | 3.84a | 1.34ab | 1.20a | 1.30b | 0.346d |
| M751 | 280.6b | 241.0b | 29.8ab | 10.3a | 4.49ab | 1.58a | 4.29ab | 86.0b | 10.55a | 3.65a | 1.57ab | 0.56a | 1.53ab | 0.356c |
| DH618 | 327.8a | 282.5a | 34.0a | 11.0a | 3.85ab | 3.99a | 3.15b | 86.2b | 10.43a | 3.28a | 1.20ab | 1.14a | 0.94b | 0.382a |
| KX3564 | 283.7b | 244.2b | 26.3b | 13.9a | 5.86a | 2.22a | 5.79ab | 86.1b | 9.27ab | 4.92a | 2.10a | 0.77a | 2.05ab | 0.323e |
| KX9384 | 305.5ab | 272.8ab | 24.9b | 8.64a | 1.35b | 2.39a | 5.03ab | 89.3a | 8.15b | 2.81a | 0.44b | 0.79a | 1.64ab | 0.340d |
| LC808 | 295.5ab | 251.2ab | 30.3ab | 14.3a | 2.70ab | 3.39a | 8.20a | 85.1b | 10.26a | 4.82a | 0.91ab | 1.15a | 2.76a | 0.364b |
SC, EMC, ENC, AR, DE, and SP stand for subcutaneous cavity, embryo cavity, endosperm cavity, aspect ratio, density, and Sphericity respectively. Mean in the same column followed by different lower case letters indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05). All data above was also showed by figure in the Additional file 1
Fig. 4Correlation analysis of grain morphology and structural parameters with breakage rate. From left to right: A: Density (− 0.934**); B: Sphericity (− 0.714*); C: The cavity specific surface area (− 0.628*); D: Embryo cavity volume ratio (− 0.551); E: Embryo cavity volume (− 0.436); F: Grain weight (− 0.371); G: Cavity surface area (− 0.138); H: Endosperm volume ratio (− 0.063); I: Endosperm cavity volume (− 0.049); J: Embryo volume ratio (− 0.015); K: Endosperm volume ratio (− 0.014); L: Endosperm volume (− 0.004). M: Thickness (0.001); N: Width (0.007); O: Embryo volume (0.011); P: Grain volume (0.013); Q: Cavity volume (0.057); R: Aspect ratio (0.087); S: Cavity volume ratio (0.209); T: Length (0.249); U: Endosperm surface area (0.288); V: The Endosperm specific surface area (0.308); W: Embryo surface area (0.374); X: Grain surface area (0.431); Y: Subcutaneous Cavity volume ratio (0.581*); Z: Subcutaneous Cavity volume (0.589*); Z1: Grain specific surface area (0.758*); Z2: Embryo specific surface area (0.927**)
Direct and indirect path coefficients for principal components
| Indicate | DPC | IPC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | ||
| X1 | − 0.0765 | – | − 0.0651 | − 0.1051 | 0.6775 |
| X2 | 0.3016 | 0.0165 | – | − 0.0075 | 0.278 |
| X3 | 0.1275 | 0.063 | − 0.0178 | – | − 0.8866 |
| X4 | − 1.0135 | 0.0511 | − 0.0827 | 0.1115 | – |
DPC and IPC stand for direct path coefficient and indirect path coefficient respectively