| Literature DB >> 31889886 |
Yiding Zhang1, Motomu Ibaraki2, Franklin W Schwartz2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study demonstrates the potential in using newspaper information as a proxy for monitoring dengue fever outbreaks in India. Online newspapers are being considered as sources of information on disease surveillance, early outbreak detection, and epidemiology research. Our objective is to understand the complex dengue epidemiology and discover inter-relationships between dengue fever and local social-environmental factors by mining information from local Indian news articles.Entities:
Keywords: Dengue fever; Disease surveillance; India; Newspaper; Text mining
Year: 2019 PMID: 31889886 PMCID: PMC6905009 DOI: 10.1186/s41182-019-0189-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Health ISSN: 1348-8945
Fig. 1The time variation in the number of weekly news reports from Indian local news outlets from 2013 to 2016. a TOI and b HT
Fig. 2The number of news articles on dengue fever published weekly in TOI and HT from 2013 to 2016 compared with the average monthly rainfall for India
Fig. 3The shaded maps display state-wise variations in annual dengue cases from 2013 to 2016. Three areas consistently impacted by dengue fever are outlined in blue
Fig. 4Non-linear correlation in the yearly number of dengue cases in each state in India versus the frequency that each state appeared in the news articles from 2013 to 2016. The red line represents the regression curve with an R2 value of 0.43
Fig. 5The correlation analyses provided a basis for identifying states and territories exhibiting the strength of correlations between numbers of dengue cases and numbers of news articles for those places. Groups 1 to 5 exhibit poor correlations (blue colors). Groups 6 to 10 exhibit strong correlations (red colors)
Groups and features of states and union territories
| Group | States or union territories | Features | Correlation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andaman and Nicobar, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu, Lakshadweep, Chandigarh, and Chhattisgarh | Small areas (e.g., size of a city) or islands far away from the mainland | Poor |
| 2 | Himachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tripura, Meghalaya, Mizoram | Remote regions (far north or northeast) | Poor |
| 3 | Telangana and Andhra Pradesh | Inconsistent dengue data (states reorganized in 2014) | Poor |
| 4 | Karnataka and Orissa | Coastal areas, consistent severe outbreaks | Poor |
| 5 | Jharkhand | Consistently minor outbreaks | Poor |
| 6 | Delhi | Largest reported dengue cases, greater media interests, large population density, political importance | Good |
| 7 | Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, and Maharashtra | Close to Delhi, relatively large dengue cases and news reports | Good |
| 8 | Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Gujarat | Coastal areas, high rainfalls, moderate dengue cases, relatively small numbers of news reports | Good |
| 9 | Bihar, Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh | North or west arid areas, small numbers of dengue cases and news reports | Good |
| 10 | West Bengal | Large dengue cases, but relatively few reports | Good |
Fig. 6The monthly number of news articles in five states compared with monthly rainfall between 2013 and 2016. For comparison, the actual numbers of disease case for each year are also included
Fig. 7Variations in the numbers of news reports concerned with dengue in each state versus the distances from states to Delhi. The red lines show a consistent tendency for article numbers to decline away from Delhi.
Fig. 8Variations in the numbers of news reports concerned with dengue fever for states within 600 km of Delhi as a function of their distance to Delhi. The dots represent numbers of news reports for the states in 2013–2016. The curves are the trend lines for the 4 different years.