| Literature DB >> 31889872 |
Abstract
Fungal is a physiological trail and its understanding in the assimilation with the transfer of carbon (C) cumEntities:
Keywords: 13C-15N- labelled amino acids; 13C-15N-labelled ammonium nitrate plus sugar; Anacamptis laxiflor; Anacamptis palustris; Mycorrhizal fungi
Year: 2019 PMID: 31889872 PMCID: PMC6933280 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.11.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Carbon and nitrogen Sources 13C, 15N extents in the experiment.
| Carbon and nitrogen sources | Isotopes | Labelled (mg l−1) |
|---|---|---|
| Amino acids | 15N | 39.56 |
| Ammonium nitrate + sugar | 15N | 13.17 |
| Ammonium nitrate only | 15N | 13.17 |
Fig. 1Biomass of A. palustris shoots served and connected through the isotopically labelled Carbon-Nitrogen sources. The variations between mean dry weight were performed with 2-Way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test (TMCT) (p < 0.05; Table 2). p < 0.05.
Shoot biomass of two orchid species by used 2-way ANOVA.
| Species | Factor | d.f. | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connection | 1,30 | 40.35 | 0.001 | |
| Substrate | 2,30 | 7.46 | 0.064 | |
| Connection × Substrate | 2,30 | 6.15 | 0.770 | |
| Connection | 1,30 | 50.66 | 0.001 | |
| Substrate | 2,30 | 1.77 | 0.012 | |
| Connection × Substrate | 2,30 | 4.21 | 0.001 |
Fig. 2Biomass of A. laxiflora plant shoots were linked via their fungal partners by the isotopically labelled Carbon-Nitrogen sources. In each bar 2-way ANOVA analysis was performed to differentiate between the mean dry-weight followed by TMCT (Table 2). p < 0.05.
Fig. 313C mass in A. palustris shoots after supplying 15N-13C labelled organic/inorganic compounds through the isotope labelled Carbon-Nitrogen compounds. The 2-way ANOVA analysis was used in each bar to measure the alterations between the mean mass followed by TMCT (Table 3). p < 0.05.
Shoot mass of 13C of two orchid species by used 2-way ANOVA.
| Species | Factor | d.f. | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connection | 1,30 | 87.46 | 0.001 | |
| Substrate | 2,30 | 52.20 | 0.001 | |
| Connection × Substrate | 2,30 | 36.22 | 0.001 | |
| Connection | 1,30 | 96.44 | 0.001 | |
| Substrate | 2,30 | 68.53 | 0.003 | |
| Connection × Substrate | 2,30 | 60.21 | 0.001 |
Fig. 413C concentrated shoots in A. palustris of connected through isotopically labelled C-N sources. The Two-way Anova analysis was implemented between each graph and differences between the mean concentrations (Table 4). p < 0.05.
Shoot concentration of 13C of two orchid species by used 2-way ANOVA.
| Species | Factor | d.f. | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connection | 1,30 | 98.77 | 0.001 | |
| Substrate | 2,30 | 40.35 | 0.088 | |
| Connection × Substrate | 2,30 | 30.45 | 0.661 | |
| Connection | 1,30 | 113.08 | 0.001 | |
| Substrate | 2,30 | 60.12 | 0.003 | |
| Connection × Substrate | 2,30 | 60.35 | 0.001 |
Fig. 5Mass of 13C in A. laxiflora plant shoots connected through isotopically labelled C-N sources through their fungal partners using ANOVA analysis (two-way) and TMCT (Table 3). p < 0.05.
Fig. 6Concentration of 13C shoots of A. laxiflora connected isotopically via Carbon-Nitrogen sources through the fungal partners. In every graph, 2-way ANOVA analysis was used to differentiate between the mean concentration of 13C (Table 4). p < 0.05.
Fig. 7Mass of 15N shoots of A. palustris connected by isotopically labelled Carbon-Nitrogen sources through their fungal infections using 2-way ANOVA analysis followed by TMCT for each graph and differences between mean mass (Table 5). p < 0.05.
Shoot mass of 15N of two orchid species by used 2-way ANOVA.
| Species | Factor | d.f. | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connection | 1,30 | 130.75 | 0.001 | |
| Substrate | 2,30 | 18.80 | 0.062 | |
| Connection × Substrate | 2,30 | 13.45 | 0.081 | |
| Connection | 1,30 | 88.40 | 0.001 | |
| Substrate | 2,30 | 6.80 | 0.041 | |
| Connection × Substrate | 2,30 | 5.35 | 0.001 |
Fig. 815N concentration in the A. palustris shoots connected from isotopically labelled Carbon-Nitrogen sources. In each and every graph, the differences between mean concentration were solved using 2-way ANOVA analysis and TMCT (Table 6). p < 0.05.
Shoot concentration of 15N of two orchid species by used 2-way ANOVA.
| Species | Factor | d.f. | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connection | 1,30 | 112.14 | 0.001 | |
| Substrate | 2,30 | 15.25 | 0.015 | |
| Connection × Substrate | 2,30 | 18.7 5 | 0.001 | |
| Connection | 1,30 | 152.57 | 0.001 | |
| Substrate | 2,30 | 2.85 | 0.078 | |
| Connection × Substrate | 2,30 | 4.76 | 0.126 |
Fig. 9Mass of 15N connected with Carbon and Nitrogen sources associated with their fungal partners in the shoots of A. laxiflora plants. Routine ANOVA (TWO-WAY) and TMCT analysis were implemented for each-graph and difference between the mean mass (Table 5). p < 0.05.
Fig. 10A. laxiflora shoots of 15N concentration of connected from the isotopically labelled Carbon-Nitrogen sources via using 2-way ANOVA analysis and TMCT in each graph, difference between mean of 15N concentration (Table 6). p < 0.05.