| Literature DB >> 31889867 |
V Duraipandiyan1,2, R Balamurugan2, Naif Abdullah Al-Dhabi1, T William Raja2, P Ganesan2, B Ahilan2, M Valan Arasu1, S Ignacimuthu2, Galal Ali Esmail1.
Abstract
Borassus flabellifer L. is a tall palm traditionally used for its stimulating, diuretic and anti-inflammatory activities; it is rich in fibers and various pharmacologically important secondary metabolites. This study was undertaken to evaluate the antidiabetic effects of Borassus flabellifer fruit methanol extract (BF-M) on diabetic rats induced with High Fat Diet (HFD)/streptozotocin (STZ). When BF-M (100 or 200 mg/kg) was administered for 21 days orally it led to a sharp decline in triglycerides, total cholesterol, free unsaturated fat, glucose-6-phosphate, fasting blood glucose and fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase in contrast to diabetic control. BF-M also downregulated Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase 1B. In vitro study showed the IC50 value to be 23.98 μg/mL. BF-M significantly increased serum insulin, glycogen content, and body weight. Western blot analysis exhibited significant inhibition of PTP1B in pancreatic tissue which was confirmed by histology and immunohistological studies. GC-MS analysis revelaled that the presence of major compounds such as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (47.56%), Guanosine (21.01%) and n-hecxadeconoic acid (25.14%) in BF-M. In short, BF-M exerted antidiabetic property by down regulating PTP1B expression, and eventually enhancing glucose stimulated insulin release; it also exhibited favorable effects in diabetes and its secondary complications.Entities:
Keywords: Borassus flabellifer; Diabetes mellitus; GC-MS; Insulin secretion; Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase 1B; β-Cells regeneration
Year: 2019 PMID: 31889867 PMCID: PMC6933253 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.11.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1(a) GC-MS analysis of Borassus flabellifer fruit methanol extract.
Effect of BF-M on Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase-1B (PTP1B) enzyme activity in in vitro.
| Sample | Concentration (μg/mL) | (%) Inhibition | IC 50 |
|---|---|---|---|
| BF-M | 5 | 20.53 ± 0.29 | 23.98 |
| 10 | 37.77 ± 0.34 | ||
| 25 | 56.92 ± 0.28 | ||
| 50 | 77.09 ± 0.63 | ||
| 100 | 98.72 ± 0.32 | ||
| Agarbose | 0.1 | 32.14 ± 0.57 | 0.362 |
| 0.5 | 61.30 ± 0.84 | ||
| 1 | 75.34 ± 0.21 | ||
| 2 | 99.50 ± 0.25 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (% inhibition) and mean (IC50) n = 6.
B-F: Borassus flabellifer Methanol extract Agarbose: Standard.
Fig. 2(a) Effect of BF-M (100 and 200 mg/kg) on Fasting plasma glucose level in HFD fed-STZ induced diabetic rats. (b) Effect of BF-M on liver and muscle glycogen content in HFD fed-STZ induced diabetic rats. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). Significant difference between two groups were analysed by Student’s t-test. a Significantly no different (P > 0.05) from normal control; b Significantly different (P < 0.01) from normal control; c Significantly different (P < 0.05) from diabetic control; d Significantly different (P < 0.05) from diabetic control; e Significantly different (P < 0.01) from diabetic control.
Effect of BF-M (100 and 200 mg/kg) on body weight in HFD fed- low STZ induced diabetic rats.
| Treatment | Body weight (g) | |
|---|---|---|
| Initial | Final | |
| Normal control | 184.10 ± 2.01 | 213.40 ± 2.31 |
| Diabetic control | 185.45 ± 3.10 | 189 ± 5.70 |
| Diabetic | 191.24 ± 4.21 | 198.50 ± 4.17 |
| Diabetic | 189.30 ± 5.10 | 210.50 ± 5.75 |
| Diabetic + glibenclamide (5 mg/kg) | 190.62 ± 3.70 | 214.37 ± 4.12 |
Results are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M in each group (n = 6). Significant difference between two groups were analysed by Student’s t-test.
Significantly different (P < 0.01) from normal control.
Significantly different (P < 0.05) from diabetic control.
Significantly different (P < 0.01) from diabetic control.
Effect of BF-M (100 and 200 mg/kg) on plasma insulin level in HFD fed-STZ induced diabetic rats.
| Treatment | Plasma insulin level | |
|---|---|---|
| 7th day | 28th day | |
| Normal control | 125.11 ± 0.87 | 131.09 ± 1.88 |
| Diabetic control | 54.66 ± 1.89 | 49.49 ± 0.89 |
| Diabetic | 52.19 ± 1.96 | 84.85 ± 1.27 |
| Diabetic | 51.65 ± 1.73 | 112.29 ± 1.09 |
| Diabetic + glibenclamide (5 mg/kg) | 49.52 ± 1.38 | 117.70 ± 0.98 |
Results are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M in each group (n = 6). Significant difference between two groups were analysed by Student’s t-test.
Significantly different (P < 0.01) from normal control.
Significantly different (P < 0.05) from diabetic control.
Significantly different (P < 0.01) from diabetic control.
Effect of BF-M (100 and 200 mg) induced diabetic rats after 21 days study.
| Groups | Glucose 6 phosphatase (μ mole of Pi liberated/min/mg protein) | Fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase (µ mole of Pi liberated/min/mg protein) |
|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 0.15 ± 0.006 | 7.20 ± 0.71 |
| Diabetic control | 0.34 ± 0.122 | 20.36 ± 0.91 |
| Diabetic | 0.27 ± 0.007 | 14.67 ± 0.82 |
| Diabetic | 0.24 ± 0.006 | 9.28 ± 0.50 |
| Diabetic + Glibenclamide (5 mg/kg) | 0.23 ± 0.014 | 8.94 ± 0.68 |
Results are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M in each group (n = 6). Significant difference between two groups were analysed by Student’s t-test.
Significantly different (P < 0.01) from normal control.
Significantly different (P < 0.05) from diabetic control.
Significantly different (P < 0.01) from diabetic control.
Fig. 3(a,b,c). Effect of BF-M on Total cholesterol, Triglycerides and Free fatty acids in HFD fed-STZ induced diabetic rats. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). Significant difference between two groups were analysed by Student’s t-test. b Significantly different (P < 0.01) from normal control; c Significantly different (P < 0.05) from diabetic control; d Significantly different (P < 0.05) from diabetic control.
Fig. 4Effect of BF-M on PTP1B expression on normal and HFD fed-STZ induced diabetic rats. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). Significant differences between two groups were analyzed by Student’s t-test. b Significantly different (P < 0.01) from normal control; c Significantly different (P < 0.05) from diabetic control; d Significantly different (P < 0.05) from diabetic control; e Significantly different (P < 0.01) from diabetic control.
Fig. 5(a) Histopathological study of normal and HFD fed-STZ induced diabetic rat pancreas. A-Normal pancreas; B- Diabetic control; C- Diabetic +BF-M (100 mg/kg); D- Diabetic + 66 BF-M (200 mg/kg); E- Diabetic + Glibenclamide (5 mg/kg). (b). Immunohistochemical analysis of normal and .HFD fed-STZ induced diabetic rat pancreas. A-Healthy β-cells were seen Langerhans in the islets of normal control group, B – Weak insulin immuno reactivity can be seen in a few β-cells in the islet of Langerhans in Diabetic control, C- few β-cells in some islets displaying insulin immunopositive in very small granules of diabetic rats treated with BF-M 100 mg/kg; Diabetic animal treated with BF-M 200 mg/kg and glibenclamide 5 mg/kg protected the majority of β-cells in the islet of Langerhans and gave strong straining with anti-insulin antibody, immunoperoxidase and hemotoxylin. (c) Relationship between insulin immunopositive and positive islets area (%) of HFD fed-STZ Induced diabetic rats. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of the number β-cells detected in each islet section. a Significantly different (P < 0.01) from normal control; b Significantly different (P < 0.05) from diabetic control; c Significantly different (P < 0.01) from diabetic control.