| Literature DB >> 31889819 |
Fehmida Bibi1,2, Sana Akhtar Alvi1, Abdulmohsin Al-Sofyani3, Muhammad Imran Naseer4,2, Muhammad Yasir1,2, Esam Ibraheem Azhar1,2.
Abstract
Bacterial communities of marine sponges are believed to be an important partner for host survival but remain poorly studied. Sponges show difference in richness and abundance of microbial population inhabiting them. Three marine sponges belonging to the species of Pione vastifica, Siphonochalina siphonella and Suberea mollis were collected from Red sea in Jeddah and were investigated using high throughput sequencing. Highly diverse communities containing 105 OTUs were identified in S. mollis host. Only 61 and 43 OTUs were found in P. vastifica and S. siphonella respectively. We identified 10 different bacterial phyla and 31 genera using 27,356 sequences. Most of the OTUs belong to phylum Proteobacteria (29%-99%) comprising of Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Deltaproteobacteria where later two were only detected in HMA sponge, S. mollis. A number of 16S rRNA sequences (25%) were not identified to phylum level and may be novel taxa. Richness of bacterial community and Shannon, Simpson diversity revealed that sponge S. mollis harbors high diversity compared to other two LMA sponges. Dominance of Proteobacteria in sponges may indicate an ecological significance of this phylum in the Red sea sponges. These differences in bacterial composition may be due to difference in location site or host responses to environmental conditions. To the best of our knowledge, the microbial communities of these sponges have never been studied before and this is first attempt to unravel bacterial diversity using PCR-based 454-pyrosequencing method.Entities:
Keywords: 454 pyrosequencing; Bacterial diversity; Marine sponges; Proteobacteria; Red sea
Year: 2019 PMID: 31889819 PMCID: PMC6933160 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
List of sponge species collected and estimation of diversity.
| Sponge | Sample code | Class | Order | Family | Total reads | Total | Chao | Shannon | Simpson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O1 | 16,672 | 61 | 64.3 | 3.8 | 0.91 | ||||
| Sk | 10,840 | 43 | 48 | 2.1 | 0.59 | ||||
| G | 28,126 | 105 | 120 | 4.46 | 0.91 |
OTUs: Operational Taxonomic Unit is an operational definition of a species or group of species often used when only DNA sequence data is available.
Chao1: returns the Chao1 richness estimate for an OTU definition.
Shannon: The Shannon index takes into account the number and evenness of species.
Simpson: The Simpson index represents the probability that two randomly selected individuals in the habitat will belong to the same species.
Fig. 1Alpha diversity indices of microbial communities from 3 sponge samples. Microbial richness was calculated using observed species (A), chao 1 estimator (B) from the sponges P. vastifica (red), S. mollis (blue) and S. siphonella (orange) and using Shannon and Simpson indices (C).
Fig. 22D Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot based on weighted UniFrac distance matrices.
Fig. 3Bacterial community dynamics based on the taxonomic classification of the 16S pyrosequencing reads at the specie level. (x-axis: sample name; y-axis: OTU s proportions).
Fig. 4Heat map showing the richness of 16S rRNA gene sequence reads of bacterial OTUs. All sponge samples are indicated along the x-axis. OTUs are indicated along the y-axis and abundance of each OTU is indicated by colors ranging from white (low abundance or absent) to dark blue (high abundance).
Fig. 5UPGMA tree plotted using UniFrac distance matrices. The tree showing similarities of OTUs (%) of 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained from different bacterial taxa associated with sponge samples.
Fig. 6Venn diagram at the genus level that exhibit the relationship between OTUs detected in three sponge samples.