| Literature DB >> 31889784 |
Yang Yang1,2, Lulu Cheng2, Li Li2, Hong Li2, Yingyue Li3, Wenwen Jin3, Chuanliang Chen1, Jianhua Zhang3.
Abstract
Objective To explore the expression of HIF-1α, neuronal apoptosis and the influence of traditional Chinese medicine Sanqi on hematoma after brain injury in rats. Methods Ninety SD rats were divided into 3 groups randomly: blank control group, traumatic brain injury (TBI) group and Sanqi intervention group, and they were decapitated after brain injury at different time points: 6 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, 5 d, 7 d. The model of cerebral hemorrhage was made by autologous non-coagulation in stereotactic locator, the expression of HIF-1α and TUNEL-positive cells (apoptotic cells) in the perihematomal area was detected by immunohistochemistry. Results In blank control group, a small amount of HIF-1α was expressed and apoptotic cells were observed. The expression of HIF-1α was up-regulated in the brain injury group from 6 h, and the apoptotic cells increased in abundance. The peak of HIF-1α was reached at 3 d, then decreased, and remained at the high level on the 7 d. Compared with blank control group, the TBI group was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The Chinese medicine Sanqi intervention group significantly up-regulated HIF-1α'expression and decreased neuronal apoptosis, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion HIF-1α's expression was up-regulated around the hematoma after brain injury, and the apoptosis of nerve cells was obviously increased. The traditional Chinese medicine Sanqi can significantly increase the expression of HIF-1α, reduce the apoptosis around the hematoma, and thus play a neuroprotective role.Entities:
Keywords: Apoptosis; HIF-1α; Regulatory network; Traditional Chinese medicine Sanqi; Traumatic brain injury
Year: 2019 PMID: 31889784 PMCID: PMC6923447 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.08.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Number of HIF-1α positive cells at different time points in the three groups ( ± s).
| Groups (F) | 6h | 1d | 2d | 3d | 5d | 7d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank control | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TBI | 5.8 ± 1.64 | 14.6 ± 1.67 | 30.2 ± 3.42 | 39.8 ± 1.48 | 33.4 ± 2.61 | 24.6 ± 2.30 |
| Sanqi intervention | 9.6 ± 1.67 | 24.2 ± 2.39 | 38.4 ± 2.70 | 49.2 ± 3.11 | 44.4 ± 1.67 | 38.2 ± 2.86 |
Compared with blank control group, the difference was of statistical significance at each time point (P < 0.05). The difference between Sanqi intervention group and TBI group was of statistical significance (P < 0.05).
Fig. 1Expression of HIF-1α in the parts of brain injury of rats at 5 d after brain trauma. The red arrow indicated HIF-1α. (A) Blank control group, (B) TBI group, (C) Sanqi intervention group. Note: Five rats per group at each time point.
Number of TUNEL-positive cells at different time points in the three groups ( ± s).
| Groups (F) | 6h | 1d | 2d | 3d | 5d | 7d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank control | 1.8 ± 1.3 | 2.4 ± 0.55 | 2 ± 1.41 | 1.6 ± 1.14 | 2.2 ± 2.05 | 2.6 ± 1.67 |
| TBI | 24.6 ± 1.67 | 35.4 ± 2.30 | 49 ± 3.81 | 60 ± 3.08 | 51 ± 4 | 44.4 ± 2.97 |
| Sanqi intervention | 19.6 ± 1.67 | 30.4 ± 3.05 | 40 ± 2.55 | 54.4 ± 3.36 | 40.6 ± 3.36 | 33.8 ± 3.03 |
Compared with blank control group, the difference was of statistical significance at each time point (P < 0.05). The difference between Sanqi intervention group and TBI group was of statistical significance (P < 0.05).
Fig. 2TUNEL-positive cells in the parts of brain injury of rats at 5 d after brain trauma. Red arrows indicated TUNEL-positive cells. (A) Blank control group, (B) TBI group, (C) Sanqi intervention group. Note: Five rats per group at each time point.
Fig. 3Regulation network diagram of brain damage involved by HIF-1α and related target genes.