| Literature DB >> 31889776 |
Miao Yu1,2, Bing Wang3, An'na Qiao1, Yubin Ji1,2.
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to establish the best preparation technology of the particles of Acanthopanax senticosus. First, take the reflux extraction method extract of Acanthopanax senticosus coarse powder, optimized by orthogonal experimental method, to flavonoids flavonoids extraction extraction rate as the indexes to determine the effects of extraction temperature, ethanol concentration, extraction time on flavonoids content. Then by a wet granulation of thorn slender acanthopanax particles, taste with granules, forming rate, melting rate as index to investigate the influences of materials adding amount of granules effect. The results showed that the ethanol water heating reflux extraction method to extract the temperature of 70 deg, the percentage of ethanol 75%, extraction time 2.5 h, the highest content of total flavonoids in the extract. Join the 5 ml and 10 g in the extract of acacia honey, dextrin, starch, sugar ratio for 3:4:8, the best taste of Acanthopanax granules. In the end, the best preparation technology of the granules is established, and the process is simple, which is suitable for the large-scale production of the factory.Entities:
Keywords: Acanthopanax senticosus; Extraction technology; Preparation technology; Total flavonoids
Year: 2019 PMID: 31889776 PMCID: PMC6923464 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.07.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Factor level table.
| Factor | Extraction temperature (Times) | Ethanol concentration (%) | Extraction time (H) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 | 65 | 1.5 |
| 2 | 70 | 75 | 2.0 |
| 3 | 80 | 85 | 2.5 |
Compatibility of extracts and excipients.
| Prescription number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicinal extract (g) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Dextrin (g) | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Sugar (g) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Starch (g) | 8 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 8 | 12 | 8 | 10 |
Results of orthogonal experiment.
| Factor | A | B | C | D | Flavone extraction rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8.372 |
| Experiment 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8.566 |
| Experiment 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9.457 |
| Experiment 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9.779 |
| Experiment 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10.964 |
| Experiment 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10.703 |
| Experiment 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9.669 |
| Experiment 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9.446 |
| Experiment 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9.203 |
| Mean 1 | 8.798 | 9.273 | 9.507 | 9.513 | |
| Mean 2 | 10.482 | 9.659 | 9.183 | 9.646 | |
| Mean 3 | 9.439 | 9.788 | 10.030 | 9.561 | |
| Range | 1.684 | 0.515 | 0.847 | 0.133 |
Results of variance analysis.
| Factor | Sum of squares of deviations | Freedom | F | F critical value | Saliency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extraction temperature | 4.333 | 2 | 2.218 | 5.140 | |
| Ethanol concentration | 0.430 | 2 | 0.220 | 5.140 | |
| Extraction time | 1.097 | 2 | 0.562 | 5.140 | |
| Error | 5.86 | 6 |
Comprehensive evaluation.
| Prescription number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dissolubility | 13.38 | 16.84 | 21.5 | 24.56 | 33.52 | 39.48 | 42.46 | 47.92 | 49.08 |
| Formability | 45.88 | 46.72 | 47.54 | 48.16 | 48.42 | 48.58 | 48.54 | 48.20 | 46.10 |
| The total score | 59.27 | 63.56 | 69.04 | 72.72 | 81.94 | 88.06 | 91.00 | 96.12 | 95.18 |