Literature DB >> 31889177

Development of a subcutaneous ear implant to deliver an anaplasmosis vaccine to dairy steers.

Andrew K Curtis1, Kathryn E Reif2, Michael D Kleinhenz3, Miriam S Martin1, Brandt Skinner2, Sean M Kelly4, Douglas E Jones5,6, Robert G Schaut, Emily J Reppert2, Shawnee R Montgomery1, Balaji Narasimhan4,6, Tippawan Anantatat2, Majid Jaberi-Douraki1, Johann F Coetzee1,6.   

Abstract

Bovine anaplasmosis is the most prevalent tick-transmitted disease of cattle worldwide and a major obstacle to profitable beef production. Use of chlortetracycline-medicated feed to control active anaplasmosis infections during the vector season has raised concerns about the potential emergence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria that may pose a risk to human health. Furthermore, the absence of effectiveness data for a commercially available, conditionally licensed anaplasmosis vaccine is a major impediment to implementing anaplasmosis control programs. The primary objective of this study was to develop a single-dose vaccine delivery platform to produce long-lasting protective immunity against anaplasmosis infections. Twelve Holstein steers, aged 11 to 12 wk, were administered a novel 3-stage, single-dose vaccine against Anaplasma marginale, a major surface protein 1a. The vaccine consisted of a soluble vaccine administered subcutaneously (s.c.) for immune priming, a vaccine depot of a biodegradable polyanhydride rod with intermediate slow release of the vaccine for boosting immune response, and an immune-isolated vaccine platform for extended antigen release (VPEAR implant) deposited s.c. in the ear. Six calves were randomly assigned to 2 vaccine constructs (n = 3) that featured rods and implants containing a combination of 2 different adjuvants, diethylaminoethyl (DEAE)-Dextran and Quil-A (Group A). The remaining 6 calves were randomly assigned to 2 vaccine constructs (n = 3) that featured rods and implants containing the same adjuvant (either DEAE-Dextran or Quil A) (Group B). Twenty-one months post-implantation, calves were challenged intravenously with A. marginale stabilate and were monitored weekly for signs of fever, decreased packed cell volume (PCV) and bacteremia. Data were analyzed using a mixed-effects model and chi-squared tests (SAS v9.04.01, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Calves in Group A had higher PCV than calves in Group B (P = 0.006) at day 35 post-infection. Calves in Group A were less likely to require antibiotic intervention compared with calves in Group B (P = 0.014). Results indicate that calves exhibited diminished clinical signs of anaplasmosis when antigen was delivered with a combination of adjuvants as opposed to a single adjuvant. This demonstrates the feasibility of providing long-lasting protection against clinical bovine anaplasmosis infections using a subcutaneous ear implant vaccine construct.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Anaplasma marginalezzm321990 ; zzm321990 Bos tauruszzm321990 ; anaplasmosis; cattle; implant; vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31889177      PMCID: PMC7271671          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  30 in total

1.  Immunization of beef heifers against gonadotropin-releasing hormone prevents luteal activity and pregnancy: Effect of conjugation to different proteins and effectiveness of adjuvants.

Authors:  J A Vizcarra; S L Karges; R P Wettemann
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The efficacy of three chlortetracycline regimens in the treatment of persistent Anaplasma marginale infection.

Authors:  James B Reinbold; Johann F Coetzee; Larry C Hollis; Jason S Nickell; Casey Riegel; K C Olson; Roman R Ganta
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 3.  Tabanids: neglected subjects of research, but important vectors of disease agents!

Authors:  Frédéric Baldacchino; Marc Desquesnes; Steve Mihok; Lane D Foil; Gérard Duvallet; Sathaporn Jittapalapong
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.342

4.  Characterization of a neutralization-sensitive epitope on the Am 105 surface protein of Anaplasma marginale.

Authors:  G H Palmer; S D Waghela; A F Barbet; W C Davis; T C McGuire
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.981

5.  Comparison of iatrogenic transmission of Anaplasma marginale in Holstein steers via needle and needle-free injection techniques.

Authors:  James B Reinbold; Johann F Coetzee; Larry C Hollis; Jason S Nickell; Casey M Riegel; Julia A Christopher; Roman R Ganta
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.156

Review 6.  Anaplasma marginale major surface protein 1a: a marker of strain diversity with implications for control of bovine anaplasmosis.

Authors:  Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz; José de la Fuente
Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 3.744

Review 7.  International collaborative research: significance of tick-borne hemoparasitic diseases to world animal health.

Authors:  G Uilenberg
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.738

8.  Concomitant infection of cattle with the vaccine strain Anaplasma marginale ss centrale and field strains of A. marginale.

Authors:  Varda Shkap; B Leibovitz; Y Krigel; T Molad; L Fish; M Mazuz; L Fleiderovitz; I Savitsky
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Bovine anaplasmosis: elimination of the carrier state with injectable long-acting oxytetracycline.

Authors:  B L Swift; G M Thomas
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1983-07-01       Impact factor: 1.936

10.  A novel antigen from Anaplasma marginale: characterization, expression and preliminary evaluation of the recombinant protein.

Authors:  Michelle Hope; George Riding; Moira Menzies; Peter Willadsen
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2004-01-02       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Immune Response to Tick-Borne Hemoparasites: Host Adaptive Immune Response Mechanisms as Potential Targets for Therapies and Vaccines.

Authors:  Alessandra Torina; Valeria Blanda; Sara Villari; Antonio Piazza; Francesco La Russa; Francesca Grippi; Marco Pio La Manna; Diana Di Liberto; José de la Fuente; Guido Sireci
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.