| Literature DB >> 31889096 |
Li Ma1, Xuefang Wang2, Yuanyuan Pu1,3, Junyan Wu1,3, Jeffrey A Coulter4, Xuecai Li1,3, Lijun Wang5, Lijun Liu1, Yan Fang1, Zaoxia Niu1,3, Jinli Yue1,3, Jing Bai1,3, Yuhong Zhao1,3, Jiaojiao Jin1,3, Yu Chang1,3, Wancang Sun6,7.
Abstract
Winter and early spring wind soil erosion have considerable impacts on ecosystems, human well-being and agricultural production in the low precipitation zones of northern China. Little is known about the impact of growing winter rapeseed on ecological cropping systems and the associated economic benefits in the wind erosion area. To explore the winter rapeseed cover effect, we conducted a field experiment in which we covered the soil with winter rapeseed, winter wheat and wheat stubble at different plant density levels and used the spring bare ground as the control (CK). The effects of wind erosion, the "winter rapeseed + " multiple cropping system, and the economic benefits were compared. There was a large difference in the dry matter, the maximum water absorption, the maximum water storage, the soil evaporation and total wind erosion, the amount of sediment transported in the stratum and the wind erosion modulus. Among them, the mean wind erosion modulus of spring sowing bare land was as high as 490.9 kg·hm-2·h-1, which was 7 and 13 times that of winter wheat and winter rapeseed, respectively. As the wind speed increased from 14 to 22 m·s-1, from a small density to a large density, the mean wind erosion modulus decreased from 68 to 17 kg·hm-2·h-1 for winter rapeseed, and 150 to 31 kg·hm-2·h-1 for winter wheat. Total wind-erosion of sediment transport of CK was 18.6 g·m-2 min-1, which was 16 and 31 times the mean value of winter wheat and winter rapeseed, respectively. "Winter rapeseed + " replanting peanuts, potatoes, rice, seed melons and other crops generally increased the production value by 5-74% compared with wheat and corn intercropping, which was 98-255% higher than the traditional wheat single crop. Our results suggested that the suitable area for planting winter rapeseed in northern China was approximately 3.3 × 106 hm2, and in terms of the best economic and ecological effects, the appropriate density was 5 × 105 plants·hm-2 in northern China. Our results indicated that Chinese winter rapeseed was the best choice for preventing wind erosion and improving ecological and economic benefits in winter and spring in northern China; additionally, winter rapeseed has important impacts on agricultural sustainability in semi-arid and arid climates.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31889096 PMCID: PMC6937332 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56678-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Coverage effect of different density covers. Bars with different lower case letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05; error bars denote standard error of the mean (n = 3).
Figure 2Coverage images of different treatments in the field. (A) bare land; (B) winter wheat; (C) wheat stubble; (D) winter rapeseed. Picture was taken at Wuwei city, December 2009.
Figure 3Total wind-erosion with different treatments. Bars with different lower case letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05; error bars denote the standard error of the mean (n = 3).
Figure 4Modulus of wind erosion at different coverage densities. Numbers inside the column as the modulus of wind erosion at indicate wind speed. Bars with different lower case letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05; error bars denote the standard error of the mean (n = 3).
Figure 5Relationship between wind erosion and soil coverage rate with different cover crops at different wind speeds. (A) winter wheat; (B) winter rapeseed.
Figure 6The yields of winter Brassica rapa, spring Brassica rapa, spring Brassica napus and flax at different locations. Zhangye city is located in the west of Gansu Province, and Lintao County is located in the central part of Gansu Province. Bars with different lower case letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05; error bars denote the standard error of the mean (n = 3).
Figure 7Yield and economic benefits of different cropping systems. The price of the crop is based on the local price in the second half of the year. Jingbian: rapeseed 4.5 yuan/kg, potato 1.0 yuan/kg, oil sunflower 5.0 yuan/kg; Jingyuan: rapeseed 5.0 yuan/kg, wheat 2.2 yuan/kg, flax 7.0 yuan/kg; WuZhong: rapeseed 4.0 yuan/kg, vegetables 0.8 yuan/kg, green corn 0.23 yuan/kg; Xinjiang: rapeseed 4.0 yuan/kg, corn 1.9 yuan/kg, seed melon 13.0 yuan/kg, peanuts 8.1 yuan/kg, oats 2.8 yuan/kg; Gansu: sunflower 6.0 yuan/kg; bitter buckwheat 3.2 yuan/kg, sweet buckwheat 4.2 yuan/kg, corn 1.8 yuan/kg, rapeseed 4.5 yuan/kg, foxtail millet 2.6 yuan/kg, rice 2.8 yuan/kg; Beijing: rapeseed 4.5 yuan/kg, corn 1.7 yuan/kg, soybean 3.8 yuan/kg, wheat 2.4 yuan/kg. Different lower case letters indicate significant differences of total yield at P < 0.05; different uppercase letters indicate significant differences of total production value at P < 0.05; error bars denote the standard error of the mean (n = 3).