Literature DB >> 31888977

Using Bluetooth beacon technology to reduce distracted pedestrian behaviour: a cross-over trial study protocol.

David C Schwebel1, Ragib Hasan2, Russell Griffin3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Over 6400 American pedestrians die annually, a figure that is currently increasing. One hypothesised reason for the increasing trend is the role of mobile technology in distracting both pedestrians and drivers. Scientists and policy-makers have attended somewhat to distracted driving, but attention to distracted pedestrian behaviour has lagged. We will evaluate Bluetooth beacon technology as a means to alert and warn pedestrians when they approach intersections, reminding them to attend to the traffic environment and cross streets safely.
METHODS: Bluetooth beacons are small devices that broadcast information unidirectionally within a closed proximal network. We will place beacons at an intersection frequently trafficked by urban college students. From there, the beacons will transmit to an app installed on users' smartphones, signalling users to attend to their environment and cross the street safely. A cross-over trial will evaluate the app with 411 adults who frequently cross the target intersection on an urban university campus. We will monitor those participants' behaviour over three distinct time periods: (1) 3 weeks without the app being activated, (2) 3 weeks with the app activated and (3) 4 weeks without the app activated to assess retention of behaviour. Throughout the 10-week period, we will gather information to evaluate whether the intervention changes distracted pedestrian behaviour using a logistic regression to estimate the likelihood of key behavioural outcome measures and adjusting for any residual confounding. We also will test for changes in perceived risk. The trial will follow CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement guidelines, as modified for cross-over design studies.
CONCLUSION: If this program proves successful, it offers exciting implications for future testing and ultimately for broad distribution to reduce distracted pedestrian behavior. We discuss issues of feasibility, acceptability and scalability. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavioural change; case-cross-over study; distraction; passive safety; pedestrian; public health

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31888977      PMCID: PMC7245539          DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  17 in total

1.  The association of distraction and caution displayed by pedestrians at a lighted crosswalk.

Authors:  Timothy J Bungum; Charlene Day; L Jean Henry
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2005-08

2.  The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at signalized and unsignalized intersections.

Authors:  Julie Hatfield; Susanne Murphy
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2006-08-21

3.  Distracted walking: cell phones increase injury risk for college pedestrians.

Authors:  Despina Stavrinos; Katherine W Byington; David C Schwebel
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2011-03-01

4.  Seat-Belt Use In US Counties: Limited Progress Toward Healthy People 2020 Objectives.

Authors:  Jacob Sunshine; Laura Dwyer-Lindgren; Alan Chen; Ali H Mokdad
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Distracted Walking, Bicycling, and Driving: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mobile Technology and Youth Crash Risk.

Authors:  Despina Stavrinos; Caitlin N Pope; Jiabin Shen; David C Schwebel
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2017-05-15

6.  Distraction and pedestrian safety: how talking on the phone, texting, and listening to music impact crossing the street.

Authors:  David C Schwebel; Despina Stavrinos; Katherine W Byington; Tiffany Davis; Elizabeth E O'Neal; Desiree de Jong
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2011-08-09

7.  Technology-related distracted walking behaviours in Manhattan's most dangerous intersections.

Authors:  Corey H Basch; Danna Ethan; Sonali Rajan; Charles E Basch
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 8.  Using Smartphones to Collect Behavioral Data in Psychological Science: Opportunities, Practical Considerations, and Challenges.

Authors:  Gabriella M Harari; Nicholas D Lane; Rui Wang; Benjamin S Crosier; Andrew T Campbell; Samuel D Gosling
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-11

9.  Heads Up, Phones Down: A Pedestrian Safety Intervention on Distracted Crosswalk Behavior.

Authors:  Erica N Barin; Cory M McLaughlin; Mina W Farag; Aaron R Jensen; Jeffrey S Upperman; Helen Arbogast
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-08

10.  Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study.

Authors:  Leah L Thompson; Frederick P Rivara; Rajiv C Ayyagari; Beth E Ebel
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.399

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.