Ingrid Wolfe1, Rose-Marie Satherley2, Elizabeth Scotney3, James Newham2, Raghu Lingam4. 1. Department of Women's and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ingrid.wolfe@kcl.ac.uk. 2. Department of Women's and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. 3. King's College Hospital National Health Services Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; and. 4. Population Child Health Clinical Research Group, School of Women and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Integrated care models may improve health care for children and young people (CYP) with ongoing conditions. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of integrated care on child health, health service use, health care quality, school absenteeism, and costs for CYP with ongoing conditions. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library databases (1996-2018). STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria consisted of (1) randomized controlled trials, (2) evaluating an integrated care intervention, (3) for CYP (0-18 years) with an ongoing health condition, and (4) including at least 1 health-related outcome. DATA EXTRACTION: Descriptive data were synthesized. Data for quality of life (QoL) and emergency department (ED) visits allowed meta-analyses to explore the effects of integrated care compared to usual care. RESULTS: Twenty-three trials were identified, describing 18 interventions. Compared with usual care, integrated care reported greater cost savings (3/4 studies). Meta-analyses found that integrated care improved QoL over usual care (standard mean difference = 0.24; 95% confidence interval = 0.03-0.44; P = .02), but no significant difference was found between groups for ED visits (odds ratio = 0.88; 95% confidence interval = 0.57-1.37; P = .57). LIMITATIONS: Included studies had variable quality of intervention, trial design, and reporting. Randomized controlled trials only were included, but valuable data from other study designs may exist. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated care for CYP with ongoing conditions may deliver improved QoL and cost savings. The effects of integrated care on outcomes including ED visits is unclear.
CONTEXT: Integrated care models may improve health care for children and young people (CYP) with ongoing conditions. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of integrated care on child health, health service use, health care quality, school absenteeism, and costs for CYP with ongoing conditions. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library databases (1996-2018). STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria consisted of (1) randomized controlled trials, (2) evaluating an integrated care intervention, (3) for CYP (0-18 years) with an ongoing health condition, and (4) including at least 1 health-related outcome. DATA EXTRACTION: Descriptive data were synthesized. Data for quality of life (QoL) and emergency department (ED) visits allowed meta-analyses to explore the effects of integrated care compared to usual care. RESULTS: Twenty-three trials were identified, describing 18 interventions. Compared with usual care, integrated care reported greater cost savings (3/4 studies). Meta-analyses found that integrated care improved QoL over usual care (standard mean difference = 0.24; 95% confidence interval = 0.03-0.44; P = .02), but no significant difference was found between groups for ED visits (odds ratio = 0.88; 95% confidence interval = 0.57-1.37; P = .57). LIMITATIONS: Included studies had variable quality of intervention, trial design, and reporting. Randomized controlled trials only were included, but valuable data from other study designs may exist. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated care for CYP with ongoing conditions may deliver improved QoL and cost savings. The effects of integrated care on outcomes including ED visits is unclear.
Authors: Ryan J Coller; Michelle M Kelly; Daniel J Sklansky; Kristin A Shadman; Mary L Ehlenbach; Christina B Barreda; Paul J Chung; Qianqian Zhao; Marshall Bruce Edmonson Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-06-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Maria Brenner; Josephine Greene; Carmel Doyle; Berthold Koletzko; Stefano Del Torso; Ivan Bambir; Ann De Guchtenaere; Theofilos Polychronakis; Laura Reali; Adamos A Hadjipanayis Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Julia Orkin; Nathalie Major; Kayla Esser; Arpita Parmar; Elise Couture; Thierry Daboval; Emily Kieran; Linh Ly; Karel O'Brien; Hema Patel; Anne Synnes; Kate Robson; Lesley Barreira; Wanda L Smith; Sara Rizakos; Andrew R Willan; Maryna Yaskina; Myla E Moretti; Wendy J Ungar; Marilyn Ballantyne; Paige Terrien Church; Eyal Cohen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 2.692