| Literature DB >> 31888938 |
Andrew Farmer1, Julie Allen2, Kiera Bartlett3, Peter Bower4, Yuan Chi5, David French3, Bernard Gudgin6, Emily A Holmes7, Robert Horne8, Dyfrig A Hughes9, Cassandra Kenning10, Louise Locock11, Jenny McSharry12, Lisa Miles13, Nikki Newhouse, Rustam Rea2, Evgenia Riga2, Lionel Tarassenko5, Carmelo Velardo5, Nicola Williams2, Veronika Williams2, Ly-Mee Yu2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes is common, affecting over 400 million people worldwide. Risk of serious complications can be reduced through use of effective treatments and active self-management. However, people are often concerned about starting new medicines and face difficulties in taking them regularly. Use of brief messages to provide education and support self-management, delivered through mobile phone-based text messages, can be an effective tool for some long-term conditions. We have developed messages aiming to support patients' self-management of type 2 diabetes in the use of medications and other aspects of self-management, underpinned by theory and evidence. The aim of this trial is to determine the feasibility of a large-scale clinical trial to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention, compared with usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The feasibility trial will be a multicentre individually randomised, controlled trial in primary care recruiting adults (≥35 years) with type 2 diabetes in England. Consenting participants will be randomised to receive short text messages three times a week with messages designed to produce change in medication adherence or non-health-related messages for 6 months. The aims are to test recruitment methods, retention to the study, the feasibility of data collection and the mobile phone and web-based processes of a proposed definitive trial and to refine the text messaging intervention. The primary outcome is the rate of recruitment to randomisation of participants to the trial. Data, including patient reported measures, will be collected online at baseline and the end of the 6-month follow-up period. With 200 participants (100 in each group), this trial is powered to estimate 80% follow-up within 95% CIs of 73.8% to 85.3%. The analysis will follow a prespecified plan. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee 05. The results will be disseminated through conference presentations, peer-reviewed journals and will be published on the trial website: www.summit-d.org (SuMMiT-D (SUpport through Mobile Messaging and digital health Technology for Diabetes)). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13404264. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: Type 2 diabetes; behavioural change intervention; digital health; feasibility study; primary care; process evaluation; randomised controlled trial
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31888938 PMCID: PMC6937131 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033504
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Trial profile.
Schedule of trial outcomes and measures
| Outcome | Measure | Timing (months) | ||
| 0 | 6 | 18 | ||
| Participant recruitment to the trial. | Recruitment against planned recruitment rates. | × | ||
| Participant willingness to be randomised. | Number of people showing an interest and not proceeding or those who withdraw from the control group and give a reason. | × | ||
| Feasibility of collection of clinical measurement data for the proposed clinical trial. | Retrieval of measurements of HbA1c, systolic blood pressure and cholesterol for trial participants from medical record. | × | × | |
| Willingness of participants to be followed up over the 26-week period postrandomisation. | Retention and follow-up rates. | × | ||
| Feasibility of collection of prescribing data on trial participants. | Proportion of medication possession ratio for glucose, blood pressure and lipid-lowering medication obtainable from prescribing data in participant’s medical record. | × | ||
| Feasibility of collecting self-reported questionnaire measures. | Proportion of completed self-reported measures (Demographics and Additional Information Questionnaire; MARS Self-Report Scale; EQ-5D-5L Health Status Questionnaire; Healthcare Utilisation Record Questionnaire (cost measurement); and Health Psychology and Technology Acceptance Questionnaire. | × | × | |
| Feasibility of collecting medical history and baseline medication from medical record. | Proportion of data obtained. | × | ||
| Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention for patients and healthcare professionals (including general practitioners, nurses, receptionists and pharmacists). Qualitative process evaluation. | Data obtained through focus groups, qualitative interviews with patients and healthcare staff. | × | × | |
| Assess reliability of measures of hypothesised mechanism of action and sensitivity to change in response to receipt of SMS messages. Examine relationship between these measures and self-reported adherence, as preliminary process analysis. (Quantitative process evaluation). | Change in quantitative mechanism of action measures and relationship between changes in these measures and self-reported adherence. | × | × | |
| Changes in clinical measurement data. | HbA1c, systolic blood pressure and cholesterol for trial participants from medical record. | × | × | × |
| Information on message delivery and interaction with participants. | Automated reports from messaging service on messages delivered and interactive messaging. | × | × | |
EQ-5D-5L, EuroQol 5-Dimension, 5-Level; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; MARS, Medication Adherence Report Scale.
Figure 2Logic model showing anticipated mechanisms of action in the SuMMIT-D Feasibility study, based on the Health Action Process Approach. (a) This construct includes both beliefs about the necessity of taking medication, and concerns about taking that medication.